Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology amendment act 2008 section 11 · Page 1 of about 960 results (0.070 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 19 2022

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … 11, 12, 12A, 12AA and 13 of the IT Act ................................................................................ 86 Distinction between business held under Trust [Section 11(4)]. and Trust carrying on business [Section 11(4A)]. 87 D. What kinds of income or receipts may not be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2021

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … followed on account of delay and latches. Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 9 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 11. Point No.(v): Which Court could exercise Jurisdiction as regards an offence relating to an e-commerce transaction?. 11.1. Whenever

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2021

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … followed on account of delay and latches. Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 9 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 11. Point No.(v): Which Court could exercise Jurisdiction as regards an offence relating to an e-commerce transaction?. 11.1. Whenever

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 06 2013

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-2013

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … Company, namely, late Dr.Nanasaheb Parulekar. 5 It is alleged that there was function organized on 20.09.2011 to celebrate 114th Birth Anniversary of Dr.Nanasaheb Parulekar. That programme was organized at Balgandharva Rangmandir, Pune at 06:00 PM in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 2023

Dominic Thomas vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-12-2023

First Class Magistrate charging the petitioner under Section 65, 43 read with Section 66 of the Information Technology(Amendment) Act, 2008. True copies of Mahazar and seizure list prepared by the Circle Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime, Thiruvananthapuram are … period as a project work and claimed an exorbitant amount. In this regard, even sent an email dated 11.08.2010 to the petitioner with a request to appoint him as a Technical Director. The aforementioned email was duly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2011

Mrs. Kavitha Mahesh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commissi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-15-2011

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2011(2)KCCR1662

to the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the further amendment to this Act by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.Consequential amendments brought about in the Indian Evidence Act by Act 21 of 2000 and Act 10/2009 are … (This Election Petition is filed under Section 81 of the representation of people act, 1951, praying to declare the election of the 5th respondent to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2024

Anilkumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-30-2024

Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the PoCSO Act’), and Section 66E and 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.4. Annexure-A2 is the statement of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2025

A.a Abdulla vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-28-2025

Subject : Education

offences involved are punishable under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.2. The prosecution allegation in short is as follows:The petitioner received a telephone call on 20.07.2024 from an … S.RAJEEV(K/000249/1993) M.S.ANEER(K/644/2013) RESPONDENTS:1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001 2 NATIONAL CYBER CRIME REPORTING PORTAL NATIONAL HIGHWAY - 8, MAHIPALPUR, NEW DELHI , REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2023

Mahadev Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Aug-11-2023

Subject : Right to Information

to Section 275 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Act 5 of 2009 (Code of Criminal Procedure amendment) Act, 2008, which runs as follows:"Provided that evidence of a witness under this Sub-Section may also be recorded by Audio-Video … three days by the Coordinator at the Remote Point to the Court Point by recognised courier/registered speed post.-. 11 - NC:2023. KHC-K:6386 CRL.P No.200953 of 2023 8.9 An audio-visual recording of the examination of person examined shall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2024

Jibin vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-11-2024

registered for the offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The 2 nd respondent is the defacto complainant.3. According to the prosecution, on 12.10.2023 and on 30.10.2023,the accused … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1946 CRIME NO.49/2024 OF SULTHAN BATHERY POLICE STATION, Wayanad PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial