Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22 … clause (i), if the other conditions laid down therein were satisfied.” 5 Section 4(3) of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, reads as follows: “(3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Oscar Laboratories (P) Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(P& H)546

Tribunal should be communicated to this centre every fortnight so that this information is available to all other charges, and there is uniformity in the … under Order 43, Rule1 of C.P.C., - Held, After introduction of Section 110A in the C.P.C., by 2002 Amendment Act, no Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable against judgment/order/decree passed by a Single Judge of a High Court. A … were granted statutory status with the insertion of Section 268A into the IT Act, 1961, by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 1st April, 1999. The second contention advanced by the learned Counsel for the respondent-assessee … were laying down laving down monentary limits of revenue effect of Rs. 10,000 for filing appeals before Tribunal, Rs. 30,000 for reference before High Court

Anilkumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the PoCSO Act’), and Section 66E and 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.4. Annexure-A2 is the statement of

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Information Technology Act 2000 has been amended by the Parliament with effect from 27.10.2009 by way of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, in and under which, the word ''hacking'' has been removed in the amended Act, 2008 and Section 66

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … 4.17.2. It is further alleged that the said Accused No.1 confirmed having sold SUHAGRA-100 Tablets (Sildenafil Citrate Tablets 100 mg), during the Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 8 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 period between 13.10.2014 and

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … 4.17.2. It is further alleged that the said Accused No.1 confirmed having sold SUHAGRA-100 Tablets (Sildenafil Citrate Tablets 100 mg), during the Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 8 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 period between 13.10.2014 and

Koshy Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 65, 66, 66(1), 66(2) and 77B; ;Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83 and 438; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 419 and 420

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT945

is bailable in view of Section 77B of the Information Technology Act. Section 77B was introduced by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (Act 10 of 2009). Section 77B provides that notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

punishable. 28 This aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person,

Smriti Achuthan vs the State Represented by

Court : Chennai

to have committed offences punishable under Sections 408 and 420 of the IPC and Section 66A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. .. A-5 Smriti Achuthan, joined Pace Automation, an executive assistant to the Chairman and CEO, on 01.06.2009. She … as Executive Assistant. When the final report was submitted before the court in the year 2021, near about 10 years later, at the time of filing of the final report, name of the petitioner was included as

M/S. Mfar Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of Comme ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the amendments is quoted hereunder for ready reference: [3]. Subject to SECTION103]. OF THE KVAT ACT PRIOR TO AMENDMENT Act No.5 of 2008: input tax restrictions specified in Sections 11, 12, 14, 17, 18 and 19, the net … than as a result of an inspection or receipt of any other information or evidence by the prescribed authority, [a]. [b]. he shall furnish a … rejected by the Authorities. 5. The learned counsel Smt.Vani.H., appearing for the petitioner submitted that Sub-section [4]. of Section 10 provides for circumstances under which the deduction of input tax credit can be restricted. According to the said