Advanced Search Results

Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Karnal Co-operative Sugar Mills

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)99TTJ(Delhi)330

to please furnish the details of sugarcane purchased by you from the members and non-members, separately. The above information should be furnished latest by 10th Jan., 1997, failing which I shall be constrained to presume that your … the Revenue against the order of the learned CIT(A), dt. 17th Feb., 2000, for the asst. yr. 1995-96. Shri S.K. Gupta represented the Department, whereas … to be levied. We also find that Section 80P was inserted w.e.f. 1st April, 1968, in place of Section 81, earlier in operation. The assessee-society had been declaring and the assessee-society had not been making any claim under … 40 lakhs levied by the AO under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act.3. The learned Counsel for the assessee, Shri Ved Jain, raised a preliminary

Firos Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 81; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act - Sections 60 and 61; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

J.B. Koshy, J.1. Appellant/petitioner approached this Court for declaring that Section 70 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is unconstitutional and unenforceable and also for issuance of a writ of … regard to Information Technology Act and its provisions. The provisions of the same will be binding especially considering Section 81 of the Act which provides as follows:81. Act to have overriding effect. The provisions of this Act shall

Punjab State Industrial Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)292ITR268(Chd.)

1990-91 to 1992-93 (supra) and order of the Tribunal in the case of Mahavir Spinning Mills (supra). We first consider the main issue in these appeals relating to computation of deduction under Section 80M of the IT … constituted mainly for deciding the common issue relating to computation of deduction under Section 80M of the IT Act, 1961. Three appeals have been filed by the assessee for asst. yrs.1994-95, 1995-96 and 1997-98. The appeal of … the Tribunal that the case of the assessee is covered by Section 81(i)(d) only and the provisions of Section 66 r/w Section 110 of the

Vodafone India Limited Vs. M/S. R.K. Productions Pvt. Ltd and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(5)LW626

obligation to block all websites, which violates the constitutional right of ISPs whose obligation arise only under the Information Technology Act, 2000. Though the plaintiff impleaded 38 ISPs, they have not impleaded a single website which has infringed their copyright. … parties. 25. Section 79 of the IT Act is not applicable in the instant case in view of Section 81 of the IT Act. The Delhi High Court in Super Cassette Industries Ltd.'s case (cited supra) has held

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

acts of the defendants are those of intermediatory and are protected under the provisions of Section 79 of Information Technology Act, 2000. The said provision will act as safe harbor provisions of US Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the … expression "third party information" means any information dealt with by an intermediary in his capacity as an intermediary." Section 81 of IT Act, 2000 reads as under : Act to have overriding effect.- The provisions of this Act

Rajesh Rameshchandra Sharma vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … of 144107. The respondent further submits that the statutory frameworkgoverning intermediary liability has overriding effect by virtue of Section 81 of the IT Act, 2000, thereby limiting the circumstances in which intermediaries may be held liable for third … RESPONDENTS…....40.• Google Inc./Google LLC and Google India Private Ltd……….40. • Union of India / Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology(MEITY)…………………………………………………….…..43.• The Media Houses………………………………………………46.• ikanoon Software Development Private Limited……………….47.• X Corp (formerly known as Twitter)……………………..….....49.• Microsoft Corporation India Private

Dr. Ishwarprasad Gilada vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … of 144107. The respondent further submits that the statutory frameworkgoverning intermediary liability has overriding effect by virtue of Section 81 of the IT Act, 2000, thereby limiting the circumstances in which intermediaries may be held liable for third … RESPONDENTS…....40.• Google Inc./Google LLC and Google India Private Ltd……….40. • Union of India / Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology(MEITY)…………………………………………………….…..43.• The Media Houses………………………………………………46.• ikanoon Software Development Private Limited……………….47.• X Corp (formerly known as Twitter)……………………..….....49.• Microsoft Corporation India Private

Sanjeev Sehgal vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … of 144107. The respondent further submits that the statutory frameworkgoverning intermediary liability has overriding effect by virtue of Section 81 of the IT Act, 2000, thereby limiting the circumstances in which intermediaries may be held liable for third … RESPONDENTS…....40.• Google Inc./Google LLC and Google India Private Ltd……….40. • Union of India / Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology(MEITY)…………………………………………………….…..43.• The Media Houses………………………………………………46.• ikanoon Software Development Private Limited……………….47.• X Corp (formerly known as Twitter)……………………..….....49.• Microsoft Corporation India Private

Shaktinidhi Bakhshi vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … of 144107. The respondent further submits that the statutory frameworkgoverning intermediary liability has overriding effect by virtue of Section 81 of the IT Act, 2000, thereby limiting the circumstances in which intermediaries may be held liable for third … RESPONDENTS…....40.• Google Inc./Google LLC and Google India Private Ltd……….40. • Union of India / Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology(MEITY)…………………………………………………….…..43.• The Media Houses………………………………………………46.• ikanoon Software Development Private Limited……………….47.• X Corp (formerly known as Twitter)……………………..….....49.• Microsoft Corporation India Private

Ashok Kumar Singh vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … of 144107. The respondent further submits that the statutory frameworkgoverning intermediary liability has overriding effect by virtue of Section 81 of the IT Act, 2000, thereby limiting the circumstances in which intermediaries may be held liable for third … RESPONDENTS…....40.• Google Inc./Google LLC and Google India Private Ltd……….40. • Union of India / Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology(MEITY)…………………………………………………….…..43.• The Media Houses………………………………………………46.• ikanoon Software Development Private Limited……………….47.• X Corp (formerly known as Twitter)……………………..….....49.• Microsoft Corporation India Private