Advanced Search Results

Orissa Consumers' Association and Anr. Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulato ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 179, 181, 181(3) and 182; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 23, 23(2) and 23(5); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1), 4 and 8; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Tariff for Retail Sale of Electricity) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2

Reported in : AIR2005Ori11

Gazette (Extraordinary) on 10-6-2004 they came into force. He brought to our notice that Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 provides inter alia that where notification is published in the Official Gazette, then such requirement shall be deemed

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

investigation, filed charge sheet against the accused for the offences under sections 66, 70 and 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter shortly referred to as old Act) on 12.11.2008. Simultaneously, departmental disciplinary proceedings was initiated and the same … Superintendent of Police Cyber Crime Cell, Crime Branch CID Guindy, Chennai 600 032.Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C.to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 17.8.2012 made in Crl.M.P.No.157/2012

Tirumala Devi Eada and Others Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Law (La ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

in the A.P. State Gazette is immaterial. At the outset, we may refer to Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000: “8. Publication of rule, regulation, etc., in Electronic Gazette:- Where any law provides that any rule, regulation, order,

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT DECLARING THAT SECTION 79(3)(b) OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (IT ACT) DOES NOT CONFER AUTHORITY TO ISSUE INFORMATION BLOCKING ORDERS UNDER THE IT ACT, AND FURTHER DECLARE … X CORP. A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HAVING ITS HEADQUARTERS AT: 865, FM 1209, BUILDING 2, BASTROP, TEXAS - 78602, USA HAVING ITS PHYSICAL CONTACT ADDRESS IN INDIA AT: 8TH

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nagarjuna Agro Tech Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)304ITR251(Hyd.)

1995, dismissed the appeal of the assessee. On further appeal, the Tribunal, vide its order dt. 23rd June, 2000, in ITA No. 1907/Hyd/1995, has set aside the said order, and restored the matter to the file of … of Rs. 3,59,875 under Section 143(1A) of the Act.2.2 Against the said intimation, assessee carried the matter in first appeal. It was the case of the assessee that as per the final eligibility certificate issued by the … (b) Mold Tek Plastics Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2002) 76 TTJ (Hyd) 85 : (2002) 81 ITD 251 (Hyd).4. The learned Counsel for the assessee

M/S Patanjali Foods Limited vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

M.D.Overseas Ltd.’s case referred to supra,the High Court of Delhi has held as under“30. Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as "the IT Act") reads thus :"8. Publication of rule, regulation, etc., in Electronic Gazette.-

Commissioner of Customs and Central Exci Vs. M/S. Deloitte Tax Servaic ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

such services. He also relied upon the definition of the term "data" in Section 2 (O) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and contended that the activity of the assessee is in relation to operation of computer systems and therefore

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Royal Jordanians Airlines

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)283ITR28(Delhi)

from sovereign immunity does not extend to payment of direct taxes. However, in the absence of any specific information or evidence it is not possible to hold that the income of the assessee before us enjoys sovereign … Oct., 1999. According to Clause 1 of Article 8, "Profits derived by an enterprise of a Contracting … Royal Jordanian Airlines (hereinafter referred to as "RJA") is liable to be taxed in India under the IT Act, 1961 in respect of the assessment years in question. The same issue arose in the case of the … 1. These four appeals pertain to asst. yrs. 1995-96, 1994-95, 1996-97 and 2000-2001. Appeal in ITA No. 5252/Del/1998 is Revenue's appeal filed on 3rd Nov., … in the case of the assessee in relation to assessment order under Section 143(3) for asst. yr. 1995-96. Appeal in ITA No. 3805/Del/1999 is the

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

the State of Maharashtra. He also runs a helpline for animals that rescues around 1200 animals a year. 8 It is alleged that the Information Technology Act, 2000 was deliberately used purely to convert a non cognizable … Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This

Paul Mathews and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132(4), 133A, 133A(3) and 263

Reported in : (2003)181CTR(Ker)207; [2003]263ITR101(Ker)

He also contended that the statement made during the course of the survey are voluntarily made and any information so gathered have, therefore, evidentiary value and nothing prevents the IT Department in relying on those statements. He … consequent upon the survey, the assessee has filed a revised return offering 8 per cent of the contract receipt as net profit before allowing deduction … revenue--Order passed under section 263 was, therefore, set aside.Held:Whatever statement recorded under section 133A of the Income Tax Act is not given any evidentiary value obviously for the reason that the officer is not authorised to administer … These three income-tax appeals relate to the asst. yrs. 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001.2. The assessee is a contractor. The assessment was completed under Section 143(3)