Advanced Search Results
Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another
Delhi
Jul-29-2011
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963
acts of the defendants are those of intermediatory and are protected under the provisions of Section 79 of Information Technology Act, 2000. The said provision will act as safe harbor provisions of US Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Kumar Kedia Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-03-2007
CriminalNarcotics
Indian Companies Act, 1956; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 12, 24, 29, 37 and 67; ;Control Substances Act; Information Technology Act - Sections 8 and 79; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116
2008(221)ELT20(SC); (2008)2SCC294; 2007AIRSCW7902; 2008(2)SCC294; (2008)1SCC(Cri)346; 2008(1)Crimes26; 2008(2)KCCR865;
providers such as the two companies which were intermediaries were protected from prosecution by Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. An affidavit in reply has also been filed on behalf of the respondent - NCB and a rejoinder
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNirmaljit Singh Narula Vs. Indijobs at Hubpages.Com and Others
Delhi
Mar-30-2012
MRTP
of defendant No.2, it is an „intermediary‟within the definition of Section 2(1) (w) and Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Under Section 79 (3)(b) of the IT Act,2000, defendant No.2 is under an obligation to remove unlawful content
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Tata Sky Ltd Vs. Youtube Llc and Others
Delhi
Aug-10-2016
Intellectual Property
Sky is bound to protect. Please be advised that this is an offence under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 107 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. 9. .. Therefore, you are required to … defence is on the following lines: (a) Being an intermediary under the IT Act, is statutorily exempt under Section 79 from liability in respect of any third party video uploaded on the YouTube platform. (ii) The impugned links
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNirmaljit Singh Narula Vs. Sh. Yashwant Singh and Others
Delhi
Sep-14-2012
MRTP
framed by the Press Council of India and also in violation of Section 79 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000. Counsel also submits that the Plaintiff served the defendants a legal notice upon [email protected] sent for publishing all
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKarnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Vs. Sri. C. Kenchappa and ...
Supreme Court of India
May-12-2006
Environment
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 47, 48A, 51A and 226; Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Act, 1966 - Sections 3(1), 28, 28(1), 31 and 47; Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966; Town Planning Act
AIR2006SC2038; 2006(4)ALD84(SC); [2006(3)JCR319(SC)]; JT2006(5)SC556; 2006(4)KarLJ545; 2006(6)SCALE1; (2006)6SCC371
the Act. Sections 24, 29 & 37 & Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987, Schedule I & Information Technology Act (21 of 2000), Section 79; Grant of Bail - Accused who has hosted websites providing third party data
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Fertilizer Traders [Alongwith
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad
Feb-13-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)83TTJ(All.)473
entries of two sets and gave the copies of printsout. It is necessary to mention that as per information supplied by the counsel for the assessee, the position of the regular returns of both the assessees are … on facts in upholding the validity of the order dt. 4th Oct., 2000 that had been passed earlier by the Dy. CIT, Central Circle, Gorakhpur … after considering the objections of the appellant with respect to the same." 79. The assessee is in appeal before us with the following grounds.Since the … against different orders of the CIT(A)-I, Kanpur dt. 14th Aug., 2002 passed under Section 158BC/154 of the IT Act, 1961.3. In both the cases of the assessees, undisclosed income was computed and thereafter it was bifurcated in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSnapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-07-2021
Land Acquisition
regional, national and international brands and retailers. 4.2. Snapdeal is ‘intermediary’ as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’). An Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 … 4.15. It is contended that the above documents indicate the due diligence exercised by Snapdeal in accordance with Section 79(2)(c) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, read in conjunction with the Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011, in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-07-2021
Land Acquisition
regional, national and international brands and retailers. 4.2. Snapdeal is ‘intermediary’ as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’). An Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 … 4.15. It is contended that the above documents indicate the due diligence exercised by Snapdeal in accordance with Section 79(2)(c) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, read in conjunction with the Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011, in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGarrick D'Silva Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Dec-09-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)105TTJ(Delhi)445
stock option by the assessee in the previous year relevant to asst. yr. 1998-99. In response, the following information was furnished by the assessee in regard to grant, exercise and sale of stock options:S.No Date Grant/ Basis … shares, was liable to tax as income from 'capital gains'. This sub-Clause (iii)(a) was deleted by the Finance Act, 2000 w.e.f. 1st April, 2001 and a new proviso to sub-Clause (iii) of Clause 2 of Section 17 was … at Rs. 15,53,803 as under:Salary for the purpose of Rule 3 Rs. 79,98,038.1Salary as per Appendix I Rs. 79,98,038.1Acid : Housing contribution Rs. 10,02,083.6 Auto
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »