Advanced Search Results

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

acts of the defendants are those of intermediatory and are protected under the provisions of Section 79 of Information Technology Act, 2000. The said provision will act as safe harbor provisions of US Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the

Sanjay Kumar Kedia Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 12, 24, 29, 37 and 67; ;Control Substances Act; Information Technology Act - Sections 8 and 79; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116

Reported in : 2008(221)ELT20(SC); (2008)2SCC294; 2007AIRSCW7902; 2008(2)SCC294; (2008)1SCC(Cri)346; 2008(1)Crimes26; 2008(2)KCCR865;

providers such as the two companies which were intermediaries were protected from prosecution by Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. An affidavit in reply has also been filed on behalf of the respondent - NCB and a rejoinder

Nirmaljit Singh Narula Vs. Indijobs at Hubpages.Com and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

of defendant No.2, it is an „intermediary‟within the definition of Section 2(1) (w) and Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Under Section 79 (3)(b) of the IT Act,2000, defendant No.2 is under an obligation to remove unlawful content

Tata Sky Ltd Vs. Youtube Llc and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

Sky is bound to protect. Please be advised that this is an offence under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 107 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. 9. .. Therefore, you are required to … defence is on the following lines: (a) Being an intermediary under the IT Act, is statutorily exempt under Section 79 from liability in respect of any third party video uploaded on the YouTube platform. (ii) The impugned links

Nirmaljit Singh Narula Vs. Sh. Yashwant Singh and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

framed by the Press Council of India and also in violation of Section 79 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000. Counsel also submits that the Plaintiff served the defendants a legal notice upon [email protected] sent for publishing all

Sri. Chandrashekar B vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

in Crime No.69/2025 filed by the respondent - Police for the offences punishable under Section 67, 66(C) of Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short IT Act) and under Section 351(3), 352, 75(3), 351(2) and 79 read with 3(5) of the

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). The learned Magistrate then seeks status report from the hands … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … clearly disclose commission of several cognizable offences inter alia under Sections 75, 79, 356 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ("BNS") and Sections 67 and

R. D. Chaitra vs Directorate of Enforcement

Court : Karnataka

K C Veerendra, the main accused in FIR No.Police Station under Sections 420 of IPC 1860, 66 of Information Technology Act, 2000, 79 and 80 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963, and FIR No. 215/2022 dated 24.10.2022 registered at Davenagere Extension … COUNSEL) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF THE B.N.S.S., PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ARREST OF THE ACCUSED NO.1 PURSUANT TO THE ISSUANCE

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT DECLARING THAT SECTION 79(3)(b) OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (IT ACT) DOES NOT CONFER AUTHORITY TO ISSUE INFORMATION BLOCKING ORDERS UNDER THE IT ACT, AND FURTHER DECLARE

Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Vs. Sri. C. Kenchappa and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 47, 48A, 51A and 226; Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Act, 1966 - Sections 3(1), 28, 28(1), 31 and 47; Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966; Town Planning Act

Reported in : AIR2006SC2038; 2006(4)ALD84(SC); [2006(3)JCR319(SC)]; JT2006(5)SC556; 2006(4)KarLJ545; 2006(6)SCALE1; (2006)6SCC371

the Act. Sections 24, 29 & 37 & Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987, Schedule I & Information Technology Act (21 of 2000), Section 79; Grant of Bail - Accused who has hosted websites providing third party data