Advanced Search Results

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dipesh Chandak, Dipesh Chandak

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Patna

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)110TT(JP.)at366

the said assessment years in the names of the following concerns during the relevant previous years as per information available from various sources wore taxed as income of the assessee on substantive basis: 4. Being aggrieved, the … the Department. The assessee in turn would raise bogus bills of supply of feed on the Department without actually making them. In support of these supplies, the assessee would raise fictitious purchase vouchers as if purchases have … documentary evidences to substantiate the same. He made a confessional statement Under Section 164 Cr.PC before the 1st Class Judicial Magistrate on 20th March, 1997 … the statement of Sri Chandak, as is apparent from paras 471 and 722 of the impugned order, which are reproduced below: 471. On the other

Manjeet Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376 (2) (g); 354, 363, 366, 506; The Information Technology Act 2000 - Section 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 313; The Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act - Section 6

fine of `2,000/-. In default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. 5. Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. - Rigorous Imprisonment for four years and fine of `10,000/-. In default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for … rise to the present appeal can be stated thus. In the year 2008, PW1 prosecutrix was studying in 7th standard in Government Senior Secondary School, Paonta Sahib. PW2 her friend was her School- mate. They were residing

Kalyani Sales Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 13(8), 13(10), 14, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(6), 17(7), 18A, 18(1), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(8), 19(25), 31, 34, 35, 37, 38(2), 40 and 40(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - 1(4), 2, 3, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 17, 19, 19(1) and 31; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 - Sections 10, 12, 17 and 18; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2000; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 31; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR2006P& H107; I(2006)BC1; (2006)142PLR1; [2006]70SCL177(Punj& Har)

may, by notification and in the Electronic Gazette as defined in clause (s) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), make rules for carrying out the provisions of this Act.(2) In particular, and without prejudice … less than Rs.10 lacs but more than Rs.1 lac ?3. Whether ad valorem court fee prescribed under Rule 7 of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993, is payable on an application Under Section 17(1) of the

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rabindranath Lal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)223CTR(Raj)410

Counsel for the Revenue, however, submits that despite best efforts, he has not been able to get any information in this regard and, therefore, he is not in position to make any statement in this regard. Be … Retirement Scheme (VRS) under Section 89(1) over and above the exemption provided in Section 10(10C) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The Revenue took exception to the order of the AAC by filing an appeal before the Tribunal,

Ashwinbhai Somabhai Patel and anr. Vs. Nrugendraprasadji Ajendraprasad ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1, 3, 65, 65(1), 65(A), 65(B), 65B(1), 65(2) and 65B(2); Information Technology Act, 2000; Registration Act - Sections 17; Information Technology (Certifying Authorities) Rules, 2000; Information Technology (Qualification and Experience of Adjudicating Officer and manner on holding inquiry) Rules, 2003; Information Technology (Security Procedure) Rules, 2004; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Civil Practice Rules- Rule 60; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2009)3GLR2352

Video CD. There is no evidence to suggest that it is electronic record as per the provisions of Information Technology Act, 2000 and as per Sections 65A and B or amended Evidence Act.(iii) The documents produced vide Exh. 54/1 does … and manner on holding inquiry) Rules, 2003; the Information Technology (Security Procedure) Rules, 2004 and the provisions of Sections 3 and 65(a) of the Evidence Act, the documents produced and sought to be relied upon are not … Viswesaraswami & V.P. Temple and Anr. reported in : 2003 (8) SCC 752 and the decision of this Court in the case of Kanbi Mavji

K. Ramajayam @ Appu Vs. The Inspector of Police, T-4, Maduravoyal Poli ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

- Section 3, Section 25, Section 114, Section 45, Section 45A, section 76, Section 62, Section 65B - Information Technology Act, 2000- Section 2, Section 2(t), Section 2, Section 79A - Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 - burglary and murder €“ … on back of head in the occipital region." As to the cause of death, which is relevant under Section 7 of the Evidence Act, Dr.Selvakumar (PW-21) has stated that 'the deceased would appear to have died of shock

Anand Kumar Agarwal (Huf) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)92TTJAgra81

as partners of the firm, M/s New Alankar Jewellers. The firm was also regular assessee.4.1 On 19th Jan., 2000, the IT Department carried out a search action at the business premises of the partnership firm as well … (BF), ITO, Ward Dy. CIT (Inv.) ChatarpurChatarpur Chatarpur Circle 2(1), Jabalpur.2 to 7 not relevant8. Shri Vijay Kumar Agarwal S/o " "Late Shri Chhotelal, P/o … raised against the orders under Section 263 of the Act are in the following terms : (i) The first objection raised by the counsel for the assessee was that the CIT having mentioned the name of the

Tirumala Devi Eada and Others Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Law (La ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

in the A.P. State Gazette is immaterial. At the outset, we may refer to Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000: “8. Publication of rule, regulation, etc., in Electronic Gazette:- Where any law provides that any rule, regulation, order, … declared to have been qualified by notification dated 8.8.2011 and they were required to appear for viva-voce from 7.12.2011 onwards. In the meanwhile by G.O.Ms.No.132, Law (LAandJ SC.F) Department, dated 16.11.2011, the A.P. State Judicial Service Rules,

Pootholi Damodaran Nair Vs. Babu

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 7, 8, 146(1), 153, 155(3) and 157; General Clauses Act - Sections 3(65); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1); Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 162

Reported in : 2005(2)KLT707

Courts have permitted the same very touch prior to the amendment of the Indian Evidence Act by the Information Technology Act, 2000, enlarging the definition of 'Evidence' in Section 3 as including electronic records. Really, the Courts can no longer … the tape record like photograph of an incident is a record capable of re-presenting the situation admissible under Section 7 and also a relevant fact under Section 8 as the recording of the contemporaneous dialogue is part of

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This … For all these reasons, it was alleged that they have committed the offences punishable under the aforementioned provisions. 7 In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has alleged that he is a spirited individual working for the betterment