Advanced Search Results

Avnish Bajaj Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67 and 85; ;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 140; ;Employees' Provident Fund (Miscellaneous Provision) Act, 1952 - Sections 14A; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 10; Iron and Steel Control Order, 1956; ;Communications Decency Act; ;Telecommunications Act, 1996; ;Child Online Protection Act, 1998; ;Children Internet Protection Act, 2003; ;Criminal Justice and Public Order Act, 1994; ;Protection of Children Act, 1978; ;Protection of Children (Amendment) Act, 1994; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 32, 35, 292, 292(1), 292(2), 294, 405 and 406; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 91, 190(1), 173(2), 204, 319 and 482; Water (Prevention and Control

Reported in : 150(2008)DLT769; 2008(105)DRJ721

an obscene product within the meaning of Section 292 Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act 2000 (IT Act). This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ('CrPC') also raises questions

Fatima Riswana Vs. State Rep. by A.C.P., Chennai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 6; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 6; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 306, 366, 376 and 506

Reported in : AIR2005SC712; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)589; 2005CriLJ900; 116(2005)DLT382; [2005(1)JCR209(SC)]; 2005(1)JKJ1[SC]; JT2005(1)SC425; 2005(1)KLT502(SC); RLW2005(3)SC409; (2005)1SCC582

2004 wherein respondents 2 to 6 are the accused facing trial for offences punishable under Section 67 of Information Technology Act, 2000 r/w Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, Under Section 5 & 6 of Immoral

Manjeet Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376 (2) (g); 354, 363, 366, 506; The Information Technology Act 2000 - Section 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 313; The Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act - Section 6

fine of `2,000/-. In default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. 5. Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. - Rigorous Imprisonment for four years and fine of `10,000/-. In default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for

Maqbool Fida HusaIn Vs. Raj Kumar Pandey

Court : Delhi

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Communication Decency Act, 1996; Online Services Act; Summary Offences Act; Obscene Publications Act, 1959; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958; Sections 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000; Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971; Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 163(8), 177, 178, 179, 186, 200, 202, 204 and 406; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 292, 292(1), 294, 298 and 500; Constitution of India - Article 19, 19(1) and 19(2)

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4107

impugned matter falls within any of the exceptions contained in the section would arise.32. Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 relevant for the subject under discussion reads as follows:67. Publishing of information which is obscene in electronic form.--Whoever

Dr. L. Prakash Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum grabbers Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 5; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 4, 6 and 41; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Income Tax Act; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Tamil Nadu prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-grabbers (Conditions of Detention) Order, 1986

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2596

by the Inspector of Police, R8 Vadapalani Police Station, Chennai for various offences, particularly Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 4 read with Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 and Section 120-B of

Rajiv Dinesh Gadkari Through P.A. Depamala Gadkari Vs. Smt. Nilangi Ra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9 and 13(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Family Court Act, 1984 - Sections 13; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3 Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4629

Crime Investigation Cell, Mumbai and the FIR is registered on 20th September, 2003 under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.13. During the course of hearing, learned Counsel for the respondent has fairly submitted that she has no

Avnish Bajaj Vs. State (N.C.T.) of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 292, 294 and 439; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67

Reported in : (2005)3CompLJ364(Del); 116(2005)DLT427; 2005(79)DRJ576

first instance, on the previous date of hearing.5. Mr. Jaitely, has underscored that in Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 an offence is committed by a person who publishes or transmits any material which is lascivious or appeals

M.S. Venu S/O Late M.V. Subrahmanian Vs. the State of Karnataka by the ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67, 67A and 74; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 417, 420, 465, 467 and 471

under Sections 420, 417, 465, 471, 467 of IPC and also under Sections 74, 67 & 67A of Information Technology Act, 2000. The said crime came to be registered for the said offences on the basis of the complaint filed … said case.2. The said FIR came to be issued against the present petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 417, 465, 471, 467 of IPC and also under Sections 74, 67 & 67A of Information Technology

Sharat Babu Digumarti Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

offences punishable under Sections 292 and 294 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, “the IT Act”) against all of them. Avnish Bajaj filed Criminal Misc. Case No.3066 of 2006

The Commissioner of Income Tax and Vs. Mc Dowell and Company Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35D, 37(1), 37(3), 43A, 154, 234(2), 254(2) and 260A; Income Tax Rules - Rule 6D

Reported in : (2008)219CTR(Kar)544; [2009]310ITR215(KAR); [2009]310ITR215(Karn); [2009]177TAXMAN317(Kar); ILR2008(3)Kar3218; 2008(3)KCCRSN216; 2008(4)AIRKarR185(DB)

expenditure relating to share issue expenses has to be disallowed as capital in nature.' (The page number of first citation i.e. : [1997]225ITR798(SC) is incorrectly mentioned in the said paragraph as 225 ITR 728' and therefore the … 1. In this appeal, filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the IT Act' for short), the Revenue has challenged the correctness of the order dated 23.10.2002 passed