Advanced Search Results

Mehid Masroor Biswas Vs. The State of Karnataka, By Gangammanagudi Pol ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

Bangalore City against this petitioner in Crime No.218 of 2014 for the offences punishable under Section 66(F) of Information Technology Act, 2000; under Section 125 of the Indian Penal Code; and under Sections 18, 13, 39 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) … and 505 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(1)(b), 18B, 39 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, and Section 66F of Information Technology, Act.) 1. Case has been registered by Gangammana Gudi Police Station of Yeswanthpura Sub-Division, Bangalore

Swami Ramdev & Anr. Vs.facebook, Inc. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

with the Rules are relevant. The same are extracted below: CS (OS) 27/2019 Page 63 of 76 The Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 2(j) ―computer network means the interconnection of one or more computers through- (i) the use of satellite, microwave, … contraventions as contemplated under the Act are provided for in Sections 43, 43A, 66A, 66B, 66 66E and Section 66F. However, defamation is not covered in these provisions. Reliance is also placed on the decision in Playboy v.

Niyas Kuttassery vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sections 65, 43(a), (b), (f), (g),(i) r/w 66, 66F (1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.4. The prosecution case in all cases is identical. It isalleged that the applicant with criminal intention conspired … R D E RDated this the 13th day of April, 2023 All these bail applications are filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. The applicant is accused No.5 in Crime Nos.320/2021

Niyas Kuttassery, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sections 65, 43(a), (b), (f), (g),(i) r/w 66, 66F (1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.4. The prosecution case in all cases is identical. It isalleged that the applicant with criminal intention conspired … R D E RDated this the 13th day of April, 2023 All these bail applications are filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. The applicant is accused No.5 in Crime Nos.320/2021

Niyas Kuttassery vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sections 65, 43(a), (b), (f), (g),(i) r/w 66, 66F (1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.4. The prosecution case in all cases is identical. It isalleged that the applicant with criminal intention conspired … R D E RDated this the 13th day of April, 2023 All these bail applications are filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. The applicant is accused No.5 in Crime Nos.320/2021

Niyas Kuttassery vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sections 65, 43(a), (b), (f), (g),(i) r/w 66, 66F (1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.4. The prosecution case in all cases is identical. It isalleged that the applicant with criminal intention conspired … R D E RDated this the 13th day of April, 2023 All these bail applications are filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. The applicant is accused No.5 in Crime Nos.320/2021

Niyas Kuttassery vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sections 65, 43(a), (b), (f), (g),(i) r/w 66, 66F (1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.4. The prosecution case in all cases is identical. It isalleged that the applicant with criminal intention conspired … R D E RDated this the 13th day of April, 2023 All these bail applications are filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. The applicant is accused No.5 in Crime Nos.320/2021

Niyas Kuttassery, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sections 65, 43(a), (b), (f), (g),(i) r/w 66, 66F (1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.4. The prosecution case in all cases is identical. It isalleged that the applicant with criminal intention conspired … R D E RDated this the 13th day of April, 2023 All these bail applications are filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. The applicant is accused No.5 in Crime Nos.320/2021

Amish Devgan Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

and 505(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, the ‘Penal Code’) and Section 66-F of the Information Technology Act, 2000, (in short, the ‘IT Act’), no offence whatsoever can be made out; the allegations are based upon utterances … FIRs are as under: S.No.FIR No.Sections Police Station / State 1. 78/2020 153B, 295A, 298 IPC Dargah, Ajmer 66F of Information (Rajasthan) Technology Act, 2000 2. 50/2020 153B, 295A, 298 IPC Makbara, Kota 66F of Information (Rajasthan)