Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology act 2000 section 66c · Page 1 of about 28 results (0.024 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 26 2018

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2018

Subject : Right to Information

Prior to the enactment of the Aadhaar Act, the Aadhaar project was governed by the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 72A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 provides for punishment for disclosure of information in breach of law

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2026

Neha Mahajan vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-15-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

of FIR No.336/2020, dated 26.10.2020, registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi, under Section 66C of the Information Technology Act, 2000 [“IT Act”], and Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”].2. It is stated that the petitioner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2022

M/s Ib Track Solutions Pvt Ltd Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-17-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

crime in Crime No.172 of 2019 on 16-07-2019 for offences punishable under Sections 66C and 72A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the IPC and pending before the 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.S.ABHIJITH, HCGP FOR R1; SRI M.N.KUMAR, CGSC, FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.172/2019 DATED1607.2019 BY THE1t RESPONDENT/POLICE AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS HEREIN/ACCUSED NO.1

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 20 2026

Kanwar Lamba vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-20-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

quashing of FIR No. 127/2025 dated 12.12.2025, registered at Cyber Police Station, Dwarka, under Section 66C of the Information Technology Act, 2000 [“IT Act”], together with all proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of a settlement between the parties.2. Issue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2018

Lalit Bhola vs.state & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-12-2018

Subject : Right to Information

subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5266/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.917/2015, under Section 66C Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act for short) Police Station Sarai Rohilla, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C.5266/2018 Page 1 of 3 2.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2026

P. Stephen Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-09-2026

in default to undergo Section 13(1)(d) of PC, simple imprisonment 1988 and Section 66C for three months. of Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 420 of IPC To undergo RI for two years and shall pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2026

Gopikrishna Vs State Rep By, The Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-09-2026

in default to undergo Section 13(1)(d) of PC, simple imprisonment 1988 and Section 66C for three months. of Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 420 of IPC To undergo RI for two years and shall pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2026

B.Prasath Kumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-06-2026

468, 477A IPC and section 13(2) r/w. 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and section 66C of Information Technology Act, 2000 and he has been convicted and sentenced as under: S.No. Conviction Sentence1. 420 IPC To undergo rigorous period

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2022

Sri Rahul Chari Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-17-2022

Subject : Right to Information

said information an FIR comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 against unknown person.6. Respondent No.2 who had her account in ICICI Bank files an application before the concerned … R2 AND R4 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER IN CR.No.256/2021, PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, DATED

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2026

Akash Kumar vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-04-2026

Subject : Right to Information

offences under Sections 61(2)/318(4)/340(2)/336(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Sections 120B/420/471/468 IPC) and Sections 66C/66D of Information Technology Act, (IT Act), 2000 (as amended in 2008).2. The present case was registered by CBI on the basis of … a case arising out of FIRNo.RC2212025E0005 dated 01.05.2025, registered at P.S. EO-III Delhi, for commission of offences under Sections 61(2)/318(4)/340(2)/336(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Sections 120B/420/471/468 IPC) and Sections 66C/66D of Information Technology Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial