Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology act 2000 section 66b · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.016 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 11 2014

K.R.Ravi Rathinam Vs. 1.The Director General of Police,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-11-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

The averments in the complaint and his statement would not make out an offence u/s 66B of the Information technology Act 2000. Section 66E of the Information technology Act 2000 deals with punishment for violation of privacy. Whoever, intentionally or knowingly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2015

Shreya Singhal Vs. U.O.I.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-24-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

over the internet is included within its reach. It will be useful to note that Section 2(v) of Information Technology Act, 2000 defines information as follows: "2. Definitions.-(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,- (v) "Information" includes data, … to Section 67B also provide for various punishments for offences that are clearly made out. For example, under Section 66B, whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen computer resource or communication device is punished with imprisonment. Under Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2015

Vinod D. Gangwal Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-30-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Police Station alleging offences punishable under sections 188, 500, 501, 502 of Indian Penal Code, sections 66A and 66B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and sections 23(1)(2)(3) (4) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences … FIR is concerned, it alleges offence punishable under sections 188, 500, 501, 502, 66A and B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and section 23(1)(2)(3) (4) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. As far as that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 13 2023

Viswa Hindu Parishad Kerala vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-13-2023

by the Central Government. As per the second proviso, every aggregator shall comply with the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the Rules and Regulations made thereunder. As per sub- section (2) of Section 93, the conditions referred … National Transportation Policy seeks to address; and (xi) address any other matter deemed relevant by the Central Government.14. Section 66B of the MV Act, inserted by Section 30 of theMotor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019, with effect from 01.09.2019,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2026

Amardeep Sharma vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-21-2026

Subject : Service Tax

offence punishable under Sections 61(2)/318(4)/319 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereafter ‘BNS’) and Sections 43/66B/66C/66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereafter ‘IT Act’).4. Brief facts of the case are that a source information was received by the investigating … of FIR bearing no. RC2212025E0016, registered at Police Station EO-III Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 61(2)/318(4)/319 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereafter ‘BNS’) and Sections 43/66B/66C/66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2011

Manish Kumar. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-31-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act - Sections 53, 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376, 354, 306, 509, 511 Read With Section 120B; Information and Technology (Amendment) Act - Sections 66A, 66B, 67A, 67B, 72

with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code as also under Sections 66A/66B/67A/67B and 72 of the the Information and Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.2. Learned Counsel Mr. Nilesh Kumar submitted that no specific allegation was attributed against … instant Criminal Revision has been preferred under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the order impugned dated 14.01.2011 passed by the Sessions Judge, Hazaribag in Criminal Appeal No.164 of 2010

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2019

Swami Ramdev & Anr. Vs.facebook, Inc. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-23-2019

Subject : Right to Information

with the Rules are relevant. The same are extracted below: CS (OS) 27/2019 Page 63 of 76 The Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 2(j) ―computer network means the interconnection of one or more computers through- (i) the use of satellite, microwave, … located in India, the contraventions as contemplated under the Act are provided for in Sections 43, 43A, 66A, 66B, 66 66E and Section 66F. However, defamation is not covered in these provisions. Reliance is also placed on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2017

Mehid Masroor Biswas Vs. The State of Karnataka, By Gangammanagudi Pol ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-05-2017

Subject : Right to Information

Bangalore City against this petitioner in Crime No.218 of 2014 for the offences punishable under Section 66(F) of Information Technology Act, 2000; under Section 125 of the Indian Penal Code; and under Sections 18, 13, 39 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) … for it. 6. It is alleged by the prosecution that this petitioner has committed offence under Section 66A, 66B, 66C, 66D, 66E whereas the Cyber terrorism is defined under Section 66F and the materials collected on behalf

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial