Advanced Search Results

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This

Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya, Shree Shree Raghaveshwara Bharati S ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

376, Section 384, Section 389, Section 420, Section 504, Section 506, Section 508, Section 511, Section 354A – Information Technology Act, 2000 – Section 66A – Quash of Complaint – Respondent No.2 had lodged FIR, before police against Petitioner making

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT DECLARING THAT SECTION 79(3)(b) OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (IT ACT) DOES NOT CONFER AUTHORITY TO ISSUE INFORMATION BLOCKING ORDERS UNDER THE IT ACT, AND FURTHER DECLARE … of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner - thejudgment in the case of SHREYA SINGHAL.SHREYA SINGHAL: 12.10. Section 66A, 69A and 70 of the IT Act became the fulcrum of challenge before the Apex Court in the

Shreya Singhal Vs. U.O.I.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The immediate cause for concern in these petitions is Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000. This Section was not in the Act as originally enacted, but … over the internet is included within its reach. It will be useful to note that Section 2(v) of Information Technology Act, 2000 defines information as follows: "2. Definitions.-(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,- (v) "Information" includes data,

Smt Supraja Chandra vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

by an order dated 24.03.2015, passed in WP (Criminal) No.167/2012 and connected cases, struck down Section 66-A of Information Technology Act, 2000, in it's entirely, as being violative of Article 19(1)(a) and not saved under Article 19(2) of the Constitution … came to be filed against the petitioner by the CID police alleging the commission of the offence under Section 66A of Information and Technology Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘IT Act’) and Section 201, 203 and 417 of

Ms. Supriya Meripo vs State of Karnataka by

Court : Karnataka

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Bangalore, for the offences punishable under Sections 66A, 67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (henceforth referred to as -3- ‘the IT Act’) read with Sections 500, 506 and 507 of the Indian … error in taking cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 67 of the IT Act. He contends that Section 66A of the IT Act is quashed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Shreya Singhal v.

Divya Ramesh vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

and that the accused have committed the offences punishable under Sections 66A, 67, 67A and 667B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code.3. On the basis of the complaint, Crime No.1634/2014 of the

In Re Section 6a Of The Citizenship Act 1955

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Shreya Singhal v Union of India,174 where this Court dealt with the constitutionality of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. This Court, after referring to terms in Section 66A, such as ‘grossly offensive’ or ‘menacing’, observed the same

TV9 Karnataka Private Limited, vs Central Bureau of Investigation CBI/ ...

Court : Karnataka

made against the petitioners do not attract the ingredients of any of the above offences. Section 66A of Information Technology Act, 2000 is struck off from the statute as ultra vires of the Constitution by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in

Christian Louboutin Sas vs.nakul Bajaj & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

platform be termed as intermediary?.11. Does e-commerce website automatically come under the definition of intermediary?. As per the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter, ‘IT Act’) an `intermediary’ is defined as under: company which every runs an “Section 2(w) “intermediary”, with … expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The challenge was to the constitutional validity of Section 66A and Section 69A of the IT Act and the scope of responsibility of an intermediary under Section 79