Advanced Search Results

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Amritsar Beverages Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 14 and 14(3); Information Technology Act, 2000; Evidence Act - Sections 45, 63, 73A, 85A and 85B; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 29, 167, 172, 192, 463 and 464; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 273; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2820; 2006(7)SCALE587; (2006)607SCC7; [2006]147STC657(SC); 2006(2)LC1111(SC); 2006(7)SCC607

Various new developments leading to various different kinds of crimes unforeseen by our legislature come to immediate focus. Information Technology Act, 2000 although was amended to include various kinds of cyber crimes and the punishments therefore, does not deal with … 463 of the Indian Penal Code have been amended to include electronics documents within the definition of 'documents'. Section 63 of the Evidence Act has been amended to include admissibility of computer outputs in the media, paper, optical

Syed AsifuddIn and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1) and 65; Income Tax Act - Sections 65 and 66; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 405, 409, 415 and 420

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)96; 2005CriLJ4314

under Sections 409, 420 and 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, IPC), Section 65 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, IT Act) and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short, Copyright Act).2. The crime

Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

electronic records.13. It is now necessary to set out the relevant provisions of the Evidence Act and the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 3 of the Evidence Act defines “document” as follows: “Document.-- "Document" means any matter expressed or described upon … the Evidence Act defines primary evidence as meaning the document itself produced for the inspection of the court. Section 63 of the Evidence Act speaks of the kind or types of secondary evidence by which documents may be

Suresh Jindal Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 - Sections 14; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 12 to 18, 26, 28, 36(2), 37, 40, 49A, 50, 51, 53, 60 and 67 to 69; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1956; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 69(1), 72, 73 and 75 to 83; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 20, 26, 26(6), 55, 53, 70, 76, 79 and 185(3); Electricity Act, 1887; Electricity Act, 1903; Electricity Laws (Amendment) Act, 1998; Electricity Regulation Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 13, 22, 28 and 29; Electricity Reforms Act; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 3 to 11, 12, 14, 15, 19 to 27, 63 and 63(3); Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1947; Bureau of Indian Sta

Reported in : 126(2006)DLT49

process to change over to charge efficient and standardized equipments like electronics and static meters and application of information technology and computer aided tools for revenue collection, monitoring, distribution, metering, billing and collection.Electronic meters had to be brought … VIII and XII of the said Schedule shall not be deemed to be incorporated within the supply license.42. Section 63 of the Delhi Electricity Reform Act, 2000 reads as under:-63. Effect of the Act on the Indian Electricity … mess. Various State Governments enacted Electricity Reforms Acts. In the Union Territory of Delhi, the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 was promulgated on 23.11.2000.37. Vide Section 3 of the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 the Delhi Electricity Regulatory

Babros Machinery Mfrs. (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)84ITD91(Ahd.)

(2000) 67 TTJ (Del) 551 and Sitadevi Daga v. Asstt. CIT (1999) 63 TTJ (Ind) 72 : (1998) 67 ITD 151 (Ind). (ii) It was … is asst. yrs, 1986-87 to 1995-96 and 1st April, 1995 to 8th Sept., 1995.3. In respect of the first point of difference, the facts as noted by the AO are as under: "Undisclosed income for asst. yr. … the AO who is Dy. CIT(A) Special Range-2, Ahmedabad, under Section 158BD r/w Section 158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961 for the Block Period asst. yrs. 1986-87 to 1995-96 and 1st April, 1995 to 8th Sept., 1995.2.

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

acts of the defendants are those of intermediatory and are protected under the provisions of Section 79 of Information Technology Act, 2000. The said provision will act as safe harbor provisions of US Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the … the rights of the copyright owner cannot be curtailed by applying any other provision of the IT Act. 63. I find that the provisions of Section 79 of the IT Act will have no bearing on the

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

and protection of children; (l) declare “fit persons”; (m) declare a child legally free for adoption; (n) keep information about and take necessary follow-up action in respect of missing children in their jurisdiction; Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 … the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … of this family environment temporarily or permanently. Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 52 63. Rule 25 of the JJ (Care & Protection of Children) Rules, 2007

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Enron Oil and Gas India Ltd.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(Uttranchal)411

business consisting of the prospecting for or extraction or production of mineral oils in relation to which the Central Government has entered into an agreement with any person for the association or participation of the Central Government … circumstances of the case, in allowing foreign exchange loss of Rs. 11,58,44,887 under Section 42 of the IT Act, 1961, without appreciating the fact that the loss is only a book entry and no loss was incurred … ITA No. 1823/2005 and ITA No. 1824/2005, relating to asst. yrs. 1999-2000, 2000-01 and 1998-99, respectively, whereby the depreciation on account of foreign exchange loss

B.K. Agrawal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Subject : Direct Taxation

to the extent of Rs. 78,000. Neither there was evidence available during the course of search nor any information could be filed by the assessee, therefore, reference was made to the Valuation Officer to ascertain the period … Sunder Agencies v. Dy. CIT (1997) 59 TTJ (Mumbai) 610 : (1997) 63 ITD 245 (Mumbai). The view of the Pune Bench regarding the disclosure … of salary.In view of the provisions contained in Rule 2(h) of Part A of IVth Schedule to the Act. Therefore, the payment of commission was assessed as salary as has been done by the assessee himself for … the facts of the case are that a search and seizure under Section 132 was carried out in the group consisting of (i) Disinfecto Chemical

Present Mr. Munish Mittal Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

Police Station Mujessar, District Faridabad for an offence punishable under sections 429 IPC and section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and sections 63 and 64 of the Copyright Act, 1957 alongwith all the subsequent proceedings arising out of