Advanced Search Results

Christian Louboutin Sas vs.nakul Bajaj & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

platform be termed as intermediary?.11. Does e-commerce website automatically come under the definition of intermediary?. As per the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter, ‘IT Act’) an `intermediary’ is defined as under: company which every runs an “Section 2(w) “intermediary”, with … top 5 prestigious women’s luxury shoe brand. The name the name, that CS (COMM) 344/2018 Page 1 of 59 “Christian Louboutin”, in word form and logo form, as also the red sole mark, are registered trademarks in

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

AMENDMENTS UNDER THE IT ACT 2000 (AS AMENDED ON 2009) ON THE REMEDIES PRESCRIBED UNDER COPYRIGHT ACT 1957. 59. Now I shall discuss another aspect of impact of the amended provisions of Information Technology Act 2000 on … acts of the defendants are those of intermediatory and are protected under the provisions of Section 79 of Information Technology Act, 2000. The said provision will act as safe harbor provisions of US Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dipesh Chandak, Dipesh Chandak

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Patna

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)110TT(JP.)at366

the said assessment years in the names of the following concerns during the relevant previous years as per information available from various sources wore taxed as income of the assessee on substantive basis: 4. Being aggrieved, the … (v) any sum chargeable to income-tax under Clauses (ii) and (iii) of Section 28 or Section 41 or Section 59; (va) any sum chargeable to income-tax under Clause (iiia) of Section 28; (vb) any sum chargeable to income-tax … would raise bogus bills of supply of feed on the Department without actually making them. In support of these supplies, the assessee would raise fictitious

L’oreal vs.brandworld & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

The disqualify above alia, inter factors, the website 19. www.shopclues.com for the exemption under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as the role of the website is more than that of an intermediary.20. No.2, Shopclues.com: Thus, the suit

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Prior to the enactment of the Aadhaar Act, the Aadhaar project was governed by the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 72A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 provides for punishment for disclosure of information in breach of law … to 32 (xiii) Section 29 (xiv) Section 33 (xv) Section 47 (xvi) Section 48 (xvii) Section 57 (xviii) Section 59 Answer: (a) Section 2(d) which pertains to authentication records, such records would not include metadata as mentioned in

Amit Estate Organizer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)113TTJ(Ahd.)1018

of the Act on 27th March, 2003 (for asst. yrs. 1995-96, 1996-97 and 1998-99) and on 28th Jan., 2000 for asst. yr. 1997-98. (ii) The second issue is with respect to rejection of assessee's books of account … placed on the following: (i) Uttam Chuna Pathar Udyog v. ITO (1997) 59 TTJ (Raj) 763 : (1998) 65 ITD 466 (Raj) Accounts-Rejection-Minor defects in … that proceedings under Section 147 of the Act. for asst. yr. 1997-98 were initiated without there being any information/material with the Revenue which could make the AO to have reasons to believe that a particular income had

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

and protection of children; (l) declare “fit persons”; (m) declare a child legally free for adoption; (n) keep information about and take necessary follow-up action in respect of missing children in their jurisdiction; Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 … the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … relation to the local authority only), as well as those of Section 59(2) of the JJ Act, 2000 on the ground of their being unconstitutional

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Vindhya Telelinks Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jabalpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)107TTJJab149

Section 148 the appellant filed the returns. The appellant also received notices under Section 143(2) calling for further information on certain points in connection with the returns. Thereupon the appellant filed writ petitions challenging the notices. The … stated to be pending.5. The notice under Section 148 dt. 23rd Oct., 2000 was issued for the reasons that: (1) Original assessment was completed under … entire assessment was bad in law. 4. The appellant is relying on decision of R.L. Narang which is actually against the appellant. The appellant is not appreciating that valid notice under Section 148 is a condition precedent

K.R.Ravi Rathinam Vs. 1. the Director General of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

have committed offences under Sections 66 B, 66 E, 72, 72 A r/w. 76 and 77 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 109, 379, 403, 420, 468, 470, 471 along with 120 (b) of IPC. The intellectual property … the Respondents 7, 8, 10 and 11.9. The Respondents 7, 8, 10 and 11 have committed offences under Sections 66 B, 66 E, 72, 72 A r/w. 76 and 77 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and

Bharatiya Janata Party Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)80ITD89(Delhi)

making activity into a profit earning one as of now.46. During the course of the present hearing, no information has been furnished to us by either side as to whether similar publishing activity is being carried on … learned standing counsel also relied on a Departmental Circular dt. 19th Oct., 2000, according to which provisions of Section 44AB r/w Section 271B were held … as a National Party with the Election Commission of India. A notice under Section 142(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the "Act") and a letter bearing No. 363 dt. 30th Nov., 1995 were issued on … Dec., 1995. In the said return assessee reflected a loss of Rs. 59,55,660, as under: 3. Return was processed under Section 143(1)(a). Capital gain was