Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology act 2000 section 56 · Page 1 of about 730 results (0.094 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 10 2003

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Borosil Glass Works Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-10-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Mum.)361

ground raised in this appeal It relates to interpretation of the provisions of Section 115J(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : 3. For the asst. yr. 1988-89, … therefore, rectification was done and the income under Section 115J was computed as under:Profit as per P&L a/c 56,60,000Add (1) Amount carried to reserve 74,27,886(2) Amount of dividend proposed 44,88,188 1,70,76,074Less: Amount withdrawn from reserve 12,20,169Book profit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2005

Garrick D'Silva Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-09-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)105TTJ(Delhi)445

the previous year relevant to asst. yr. 1998-99. In response, the following information was furnished by the assessee in regard to grant, exercise and sale … shares, was liable to tax as income from 'capital gains'. This sub-Clause (iii)(a) was deleted by the Finance Act, 2000 w.e.f. 1st April, 2001 and a new proviso to sub-Clause (iii) of Clause 2 of Section 17 was … to tax as salary but will have to be brought to tax as income from other sources under Section 56. This, in short, is the case of the applicant. But salary includes perquisites or profit in lieu of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2018

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2018

Subject : Right to Information

Prior to the enactment of the Aadhaar Act, the Aadhaar project was governed by the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 72A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 provides for punishment for disclosure of information in breach of law … and accordingly lodge a complaint in a Court in terms of Section 47 of the Aadhaar Act; d. Section 56 of the Aadhaar Act makes it clear that application of other laws, like the IT Act, is not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 12 2014

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-12-2014

Subject : MRTP

and protection of children; (l) declare “fit persons”; (m) declare a child legally free for adoption; (n) keep information about and take necessary follow-up action in respect of missing children in their jurisdiction; Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 … the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … this court challenging the provisions of Section 32, 33, 37(2), 41(4), 41(6), 56 (in relation to the local authority only), as well as those of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Utv Software Communications Ltd. & Ors vs.thepiratebay.org and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites blocked

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Utv Software Communications Ltd & Ors. Vs.fmovies.pe and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites blocked

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation & Ors vs.yts.am and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites blocked

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Utv Software Communications Ltd. & Ors vs.rarbg.is and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites blocked

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Utv Software Communications Ltd. & Ors vs.torrentmovies.co & O ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites blocked

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Utv Software Communications Ltd.& Ors. Vs.bmovies.is and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites blocked

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial