Advanced Search Results

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. U.P. Forest Corporation

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Subject : Direct Taxation

which has been initiated on account of our notice dt. 30th Aug., 2000 in respect of order of the Tribunal dt. 9th Sept., 1996 in … got power to rectify its mistakes by making necessary amendments. In that case, the assesses claimed exemption under Section 54 of the Act on the sale of a house at 'Bombay. The Tribunal, vide its order dt. 8th … Supreme Court is concerned, it only sought that the issue of Section 11 cannot be raised for the first time before the High Court in its writ petition and in respect of Section 11, no issue has

Ellenbarrie Industrial Gases Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)83ITD111(Kol.)

the search was deferred for a collateral purpose. In the instant case, in the absence of any definite information about the actual state of affairs, we are not in a position to come to the conclusion which … the learned authorised representative of the assessee referred to pp. 52 to 54 of the paper book. It was emphasised by the learned authorised representative … the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the assessee-company on 22nd Jan., 1997 … CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Borosil Glass Works Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Mum.)361

ground raised in this appeal It relates to interpretation of the provisions of Section 115J(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : 3. For the asst. yr. 1988-89, … to an income of Rs. 39,39,228, after allowing deduction for the brought forward unabsorbed investment allowance of Rs. 54,76,236. It was subsequently found that the income assessable under Section 115J was Rs. 47,56,772 The assessment was therefore,

Entee Builders Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)78TTJLuck952

appeared before the AO on 21st Jan., 2000. The AO started reassessment proceedings on the basis of valid information and following the correct procedure. Thus, the grounds relating to this issue do not have any substance and … financial year in which the order sought to be revised was passed." 54. The issue relating to period of limitation for reopening the assessment order … to 3 taken in this appeal challenge the validity of notice issued under Section 148 of the IT Act, 1961, for reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of IT Act, 1961, and the validity of reassessment

Utv Software Communications Ltd. & Ors vs.thepiratebay.org and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … Rights and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites

Utv Software Communications Ltd & Ors. Vs.fmovies.pe and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … Rights and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation & Ors vs.yts.am and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … Rights and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites

Utv Software Communications Ltd. & Ors vs.rarbg.is and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … Rights and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites

Utv Software Communications Ltd. & Ors vs.torrentmovies.co & O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … Rights and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites

Utv Software Communications Ltd.& Ors. Vs.bmovies.is and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … Rights and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites