Advanced Search Results

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

mark as registered. 120 Punishment of abetment in India of acts done out of India. PARAGRAPH22OFFENCES UNDER THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (21 of 2000) Section Description of offence 72 Penalty for breach of confidentiality and privacy 75 Act to … second and subsequent convictions. 63B. Knowing use of infringing copy of computer programme. 68A. Penalty for contravention of section 52A. PARAGRAPH21OFFENCES UNDER THE TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 (47 of 1999) Section Description of offence 103 Penalty for applying

Parthasarathi .M vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short “the POCSO Act”) and Section 67-B(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short “the I.T. Act”). Crl.M.C.No.2231 of 20235. The prosecution case is that on 4.10.2020, pursuant tothe information … perth v. Neil Macdonald Hart(2005 SCCR 392), the Court, while dealing with the charge of contravention of Section 52A(1) of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982, considered the nature of evidence required for proving the age of

Basil Eldose vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Right to Information

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short “the POCSO Act”) and Section 67-B(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short “the I.T. Act”). Crl.M.C.No.2231 of 20235. The prosecution case is that on 4.10.2020, pursuant tothe information … perth v. Neil Macdonald Hart(2005 SCCR 392), the Court, while dealing with the charge of contravention of Section 52A(1) of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982, considered the nature of evidence required for proving the age of

Akhil Abraham vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short “the POCSO Act”) and Section 67-B(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short “the I.T. Act”). Crl.M.C.No.2231 of 20235. The prosecution case is that on 4.10.2020, pursuant tothe information … perth v. Neil Macdonald Hart(2005 SCCR 392), the Court, while dealing with the charge of contravention of Section 52A(1) of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982, considered the nature of evidence required for proving the age of

Ahamed Mubashir vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short “the POCSO Act”) and Section 67-B(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short “the I.T. Act”). Crl.M.C.No.2231 of 20235. The prosecution case is that on 4.10.2020, pursuant tothe information … perth v. Neil Macdonald Hart(2005 SCCR 392), the Court, while dealing with the charge of contravention of Section 52A(1) of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982, considered the nature of evidence required for proving the age of

Sujith. P.M vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short “the POCSO Act”) and Section 67-B(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short “the I.T. Act”). Crl.M.C.No.2231 of 20235. The prosecution case is that on 4.10.2020, pursuant tothe information … perth v. Neil Macdonald Hart(2005 SCCR 392), the Court, while dealing with the charge of contravention of Section 52A(1) of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982, considered the nature of evidence required for proving the age of

Sharda Educational Trust Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)99TTJAgra212

business interests, savings and have also contributed their personal earnings to set up Hindustan College of Engineering and Technology, Hindustan College of Management and Hindustan College of Computer Sciences under the appellant trust which have provided a … who dismissed the assessee's appeals by his consolidated order dt. 3rd Nov., 2000. Since both the appeals arise out of the consolidated order of the … required to file a statement in Form No. 52A, containing the particulars of all payments of over … the appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter or withdraw any ground of appeal.3. The parties were heard first with respect to the request for raising additional grounds and since the learned Departmental Representative did not raise … not properly appreciated that the requirements of Section 275 of the IT Act have not been fulfilled as the penalty proceedings have been initiated on

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) and Others Vs. Bagmane Developers ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

details of which are as below: Asst. YearName of the purchasersArea (in sft)Surplus Amount2002-03Embassy Constructions291360Rs.5,83,10,0002004-05 (24.9.03)Texas Constructions304920Rs.35,98,05,6002005-06 (9.12.04)Cognizant Technology Solutions130680Rs.29,17,69,920 11.2 Further contention of the assessee was that it had erroneously offered the surplus arising on the … C.V.Raman Nagar from raja Bagmane way back in 1996. During the year 2000, the assessee intended to set up STPI for which it had approached … a piece of land from the vast holding of total area of 52A was merely a coincident which cannot, by any stretch of imagination, be … the returns of the income under Section 139 (1) of the Income Tax Act? 3. Independent of the first question, the second question as has been formulated by the Revenue is as under: Whether in the facts

Sai Mirra Innopharm Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)(115)ECC211

also undertaken in respect of Intellectual Property Rights of ARL. The Directors would not part with any confidential information in their possession pertaining to the business of ARL during 18 months from the date of Agreement. 90% … imposed are tabulated hereunder. Dispute covers the period of six years from 2000 to 2005.5,00,00,000/-Under Rule 209A of CER 1944 /Rule 26 of CE (No. … the appellant. Penalties were proposed under Rule 9, 52A, 173C and 173F. Penalty was proposed under Section … ARL. After taking control of ARL, DRL desired to sell the manufacturing facility of ARL, retaining its marketing activities through the net work of stockists.6. M/s. Soft Caps Pvt. Ltd. (SCPL) had two units at Keelkattalai and … Note: Apart from demand of duty and imposition of penalty, interest under Section 11AB has also been ordered.2. The facts have been Extensively dealt with

Bellary Steels and Alloys Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(157)ELT324Tri(Bang.)

Kathiravan Pipes Ltd., Star Marketing v. CCE [2002 (147) E.L.T. 1266 (T) = 1998 (27) RLT 820 (T)]Wipro Information Technology v. CCE is well founded; it has to be upheld, that when the activity of the assessee was … Applied Electronics ltd. v. CCE, Bombay-III [2001 (130) E.L.T. 500 (Tribunal) = 2000 (40) RLT 409 (T)]Totem Electronics and Ors. v. CCE [1999 (108) E.L.T. … duty under cover of invoice raised under Rule 52A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 as manufactured by … the billets purchased by them from M/s. Rashtreeya Ispat Nigarn Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as M/s. RINL) without actually/physically receiving them in their factory, the officers conducted an enquiry, which revealed : - (a) Since M/s. BSAL … demand had been made within the meaning of the extended proviso of Section 11A of the CEA, 1944. The main thrust of the defence therefor,