Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology act 2000 section 34 · Page 1 of about 1,361 results (0.052 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 24 2020

Yogesh Agarwal Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-24-2020

Subject : Right to Information

of Cyber Crime Police Station (CID) for the offences punishable under Sections 403, 406, 408, 426, 120B r/w. Section 34 of IPC and Sections 62 and 72 of Information Technology Act, 2000.7. It is the submission of Sri … Sections 4 - - 403, 406, 408, 426, 120B r/w.34 of IPC and Sections 66 and 72 of Information Technology Act, 2000.2. I have heard Sri Uday Holla, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of Sri Smaran Shetty for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2006

Firos Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-24-2006

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 81; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act - Sections 60 and 61; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

Matched in: Citation AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2008

The Commissioner of Income Tax and Vs. Mc Dowell and Company Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-07-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35D, 37(1), 37(3), 43A, 154, 234(2), 254(2) and 260A; Income Tax Rules - Rule 6D

Reported in : (2008)219CTR(Kar)544; [2009]310ITR215(KAR); [2009]310ITR215(Karn); [2009]177TAXMAN317(Kar); ILR2008(3)Kar3218; 2008(3)KCCRSN216; 2008(4)AIRKarR185(DB)

expenditure relating to share issue expenses has to be disallowed as capital in nature.' (The page number of first citation i.e. : [1997]225ITR798(SC) is incorrectly mentioned in the said paragraph as 225 ITR 728' and therefore the … 1. In this appeal, filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the IT Act' for short), the Revenue has challenged the correctness of the order dated 23.10.2002 passed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 22 2005

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-22-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(17); Parliament Act; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1); Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 26; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154; Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

the form of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … is quite immaterial. In Maharaj Kumar Kamal Singh v. CIT : [1959]35ITR1(SC) , the Supreme Court, while construing Section 34(1)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, has held that the word 'information' appearing therein should be treated to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2005

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-22-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; ;Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 2(17); ;Parliament Act; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); ;Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 2(1); ;Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Section 26; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 154; ;Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; ;Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

Reported in : (2005)196CTR(Gau)318,[2005]275ITR502(Gauhati)

the form of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … is quite immaterial. In Maharaj Kumar Kamal Singh v. CIT : [1959]35ITR1(SC) , the Supreme Court, while construing Section 34(1)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, has held that the word 'information' appearing therein should be treated to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2014

Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya, Shree Shree Raghaveshwara Bharati S ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-09-2014

Subject : Education

376, Section 384, Section 389, Section 420, Section 504, Section 506, Section 508, Section 511, Section 354A – Information Technology Act, 2000 – Section 66A – Quash of Complaint – Respondent No.2 had lodged FIR, before police against Petitioner making … 156(3), Section 157, Section 161, Section 164, Section 166(3), Section 200, Section 482 – Indian Penal Code – Section 34, Section 123, Section 153B, Section 163A, Section 375, Section 375(a), Section 375(b), Section 376, Section 384, Section 389,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 2018

Christian Louboutin Sas vs.nakul Bajaj & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-02-2018

Subject : MRTP

platform be termed as intermediary?.11. Does e-commerce website automatically come under the definition of intermediary?. As per the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter, ‘IT Act’) an `intermediary’ is defined as under: company which every runs an “Section 2(w) “intermediary”, with … DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :20. h July, 2018 Date of decision :2nd November, 2018 CS (COMM) 344/2018, I.As. 19124/2014, 20912/2014, 23749/2014 & 9106/2015 CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN SAS ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Dhruv Anand,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2004

Vijay Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-17-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HH

Reported in : (2004)190CTR(Raj)90; [2004]270ITR175(Raj)

used for the purpose of the business or profession, the following deductions shall, subject to the provisions of Section 34, be allowed.'It may be noted that Section 32(1) does not state, as to deduction in respect of depreciation … balance will go for the purpose of computation of total income of the assessee. It is not that first the income of both the units will be clubbed and then deduction under Section 80HH is to be … 1979-80 and 1980-81.2. On an application under Section 256(1) of the IT Act, the Tribunal has referred the following questions for the opinion of this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2005

Wipro Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on : Jun-21-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Bang.)211

Explanation to Section 80HHE of the IT Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the CBDT hereby specifies the following information technology enabled products or services, as the case may be, for the purpose of said clauses, namely : includes … Systems Division, STPK/G175/97- 18-11-1997 1999-2000 1999-2000Chennai 111, Mount Road, 98/2761 Guindy, Chennai-600Pune Wipro Ltd., CTS, 685/2B STP/P/VIII(A) 10-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Gurgaon Wipro Ltd., Flat No.201, PCMG/PSE/5 19-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Mysore -- -- -- 2000-01 2000-01__________________________________________________________________________________________ was filed by the … 51,30,40,538 13,74.67,795 81,17,02,945 23,21,42,811M.G. Road, Bangalore 33,70,79,300 12,96,63,533 7,24,35,762 1,45,20,501Castle Street, Bangalore 34,61,78,547 7,79,95,598 10,13,51,430 30,71,475Mission Road, Bangalore 34,27,44,124 5,24,45,608 81,52,40,615 28,61.59,212Koramangala II, Bangalore --

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2024

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-2024

Subject : Right to Information

petition and thereby quashed the chargesheet dated 19.09.2023 filed for the offences punishable under Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, the “IT Act”) and Section 15(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 … may also have an adverse effect on their mental state. The Criminal Appeal Nos. 2161-2162 of 2024 Page 34 of 199 suffering of the victims in certain cases may be immeasurable. Therefore, considering the objects of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial