Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology act 2000 section 31 · Page 1 of about 1,734 results (0.078 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 08 2004

Orissa Consumers' Association and Anr. Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulato ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Oct-08-2004

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 179, 181, 181(3) and 182; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 23, 23(2) and 23(5); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1), 4 and 8; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Tariff for Retail Sale of Electricity) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2

Reported in : AIR2005Ori11

Gazette (Extraordinary) on 10-6-2004 they came into force. He brought to our notice that Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 provides inter alia that where notification is published in the Official Gazette, then such requirement shall be deemed … and CESCO together with their annual revenue requirements for the year 2004-2005 were received by the Commission on 31-12-2003 and similarly tariff applications together with the annual revenue requirements for the year 2004-2005 from 'WESCO, NESCO and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 30 2004

Shamraj Moorjani Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Dec-30-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Hyd.)927

against separate but identical orders of the CIT(A)-II, Hyderabad, dt. 27th Oct., 2000, IT(SS)A No. 31/Hyd/2000 is filed by a partnership firm consisting of three … under Section 30(2) of the IT Act and rejecting the appeal as time-barred is an order passed under Section 31 and an appeal lies from that order to the Tribunal. It makes no difference whether the order of … enable him to pay the tax. It was also stated in the said letter that the Dy. CIT informed them that necessary permission would be given for selling the property and directed them to search for purchasers.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2005

Garrick D'Silva Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-09-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)105TTJ(Delhi)445

stock option by the assessee in the previous year relevant to asst. yr. 1998-99. In response, the following information was furnished by the assessee in regard to grant, exercise and sale of stock options:S.No Date Grant/ Basis … shares, was liable to tax as income from 'capital gains'. This sub-Clause (iii)(a) was deleted by the Finance Act, 2000 w.e.f. 1st April, 2001 and a new proviso to sub-Clause (iii) of Clause 2 of Section 17 was … option accepted earlier. The learned AM has expressed the view in para 31 of his order on the ground that there was no question before

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 27 2005

Shervani Industrial Syndicate Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Decided on : May-27-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)99TTJ(All.)123

was justified. 6. Because the findings as aforesaid are wholly misconceived and even inconsistent with the material and information on record and assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 on such misconception has rendered the impugned order dt. … dt. 25th Nov., 1998). The said return was revised on 30th Nov., 2000 (hereinafter referred to as second return), to make an additional claim for … 1. The appeal has been directed by the assessee against the order under Section 263 of the Act, dt. 27th Feb., 2004, passed by the learned CIT, whereby he has cancelled the "regular assessment" order dt. … 15 forming part of the P&L a/c for the year ending on 31st March, 1999, which is already a part of the return filed under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2006

Meghalaya Plywood Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-19-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

& Press Works Ltd.'s case (supra) is applicable to this case, such a judicial decision is merely an information and is not a 'record' within the meaning of Section 263 of the Act. It is, therefore, submitted … No. 421/Gau/1998, which was dismissed by the common order dt. 25th Aug., 2000, according to the appellant, without hearing him and by ignoring his prayer … and 12, which read thus:7. The point urged by the learned Counsel for the appellant is that under Section 31 of the Assam Sales-tax Act the power of revision by the CIT can only be invoked if the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2005

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-22-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(17); Parliament Act; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1); Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 26; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154; Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

the form of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … judgment and order, for all these appeals have arisen out of the common judgment and order, dated May 31, 2004 (see ), whereby as many as nine writ petitions were disposed of ; all these appeals have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2005

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-22-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; ;Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 2(17); ;Parliament Act; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); ;Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 2(1); ;Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Section 26; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 154; ;Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; ;Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

Reported in : (2005)196CTR(Gau)318,[2005]275ITR502(Gauhati)

the form of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … judgment and order, for all these appeals have arisen out of the common judgment and order, dated May 31, 2004 (see ), whereby as many as nine writ petitions were disposed of ; all these appeals have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2005

Kalyani Sales Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-08-2005

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 13(8), 13(10), 14, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(6), 17(7), 18A, 18(1), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(8), 19(25), 31, 34, 35, 37, 38(2), 40 and 40(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - 1(4), 2, 3, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 17, 19, 19(1) and 31; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 - Sections 10, 12, 17 and 18; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2000; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 31; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR2006P& H107; I(2006)BC1; (2006)142PLR1; [2006]70SCL177(Punj& Har)

may, by notification and in the Electronic Gazette as defined in clause (s) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), make rules for carrying out the provisions of this Act.(2) In particular, and without prejudice … Act postulates transfer of proceedings pending before the civil Court to the Debts Recovery Tribunal in terms of Section 31 of the RDB Act but the provisions of the Act do not contemplate transfer of any proceeding pending

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2003

J.K. Chaturvedi Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Sep-05-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)82TTJ(Ahd.)284

payments available in the paper books. He submitted that by end of 2000, assessee had made payment of tax more than Rs. 75 lacs. He … fit" include all the powers (except possibly the power of enhancement) which are conferred upon the AAC by Section 31 of the Act. Consequently, the Tribunal has authority under this section to direct the AAC or the ITO … those details.6. Aggrieved with the assessments, the assessee carried the matter in appeals before the CIT(A). The learned first appellate authority has dismissed all the appeals vide impugned orders on the ground that according to Sub-section (4)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2004

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Fertilizer Traders [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-13-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(All.)473

entries of two sets and gave the copies of printsout. It is necessary to mention that as per information supplied by the counsel for the assessee, the position of the regular returns of both the assessees are … on facts in upholding the validity of the order dt. 4th Oct., 2000 that had been passed earlier by the Dy. CIT, Central Circle, Gorakhpur … fit" include all the powers (except possibly the power of enhancement) which are conferred on the AAC by Section 31." "In the present case, the subject-matter of the appeal before the Tribunal was the question as to what … Kanpur dt. 14th Aug., 2002 passed under Section 158BC/154 of the IT Act, 1961.3. In both the cases of the assessees, undisclosed income was computed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial