Advanced Search Results

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

FIR No.24/2012 under Section 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) was registered against the petitioners by Cyber Police Headquarters, Bhopal, M.P. The respondent no.2,

Sanjay Kumar Kedia Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 12, 24, 29, 37 and 67; ;Control Substances Act; Information Technology Act - Sections 8 and 79; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116

Reported in : 2008(221)ELT20(SC); (2008)2SCC294; 2007AIRSCW7902; 2008(2)SCC294; (2008)1SCC(Cri)346; 2008(1)Crimes26; 2008(2)KCCR865;

providers such as the two companies which were intermediaries were protected from prosecution by Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. An affidavit in reply has also been filed on behalf of the respondent - NCB and a rejoinder … a substance obtained outside India had been supplied to persons outside India and as such no case under Section 24 of the Act had been made out against the appellant. Elaborating this argument, he has submitted that the

L’oreal vs.brandworld & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

The disqualify above alia, inter factors, the website 19. www.shopclues.com for the exemption under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as the role of the website is more than that of an intermediary.20. No.2, Shopclues.com: Thus, the suit … NEW DELHI Reserved on :24. h July, 2018 Date of decision :12th November, 2018 CS(COMM) 980/2016 & I.A. 24186/2014 L’OREAL ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal and Mr. Vinay Advocates. Shukla, Kumar (M:9654130460) versus BRANDWORLD & ANR.

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Prior to the enactment of the Aadhaar Act, the Aadhaar project was governed by the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 72A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 provides for punishment for disclosure of information in breach of law … for the individual a zone of choice and self-determination.”24 recognised. Privacy the sanctity of is the individual. It 24 Privacy is founded on the autonomy of the individual. The ability to make choices is at the core

Aruna Kashinath Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

records, documents and all electronic records pertaining to the aforesaid contraventions and violations of the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as amended using computers, computer systems, computer networks, computer resources and communication devices of the respondents as well … “Certifying Authority” means a person who has been granted a licence to issue a (Electronic Signature) Certificate under section 24; (m) “Controller” means the Controller of Certifying Authorities appointed under sub-section (1) of section 17. Clause (n) of

Mascon Global Limited Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

records, documents and all electronic records pertaining to the aforesaid contraventions and violations of the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as amended using computers, computer systems, computer networks, computer resources and communication devices of the respondents as well … “Certifying Authority” means a person who has been granted a licence to issue a (Electronic Signature) Certificate under section 24; (m) “Controller” means the Controller of Certifying Authorities appointed under sub-section (1) of section 17. Clause (n) of

Skullcandy Inc vs.shri Shyam Telecom & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

CPC primarily on the ground that intermediaries are exempt from liabilities under Section 79 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000. However, this Court finds that in the present plaint there is an allegation that the applicant- defendant who … NEW DELHI Reserved on :24. h July, 2018 Date of decision :12th November, 2018 CS(COMM) 979/2016 & I.A. 24578/2014 SKULLCANDY INC ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal and Mr. Vinay Advocates. Shukla, Kumar (M:9654130460) versus SHRI SHYAM

A.Kamarunnisa Ghori. Vs. the Chairperson Prevention of Money Launderin ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 5(1)(5), 8(3)(4), 8(6)(8), 71, 26(1), 42; Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 420, 511, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 121, 121-A, 489-A, 489-B, 302, 304, 307, 308, 327, 329, 364A, 384 to 389, 392 to 402, 467, 489-A, 489-B, 412, 413, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 467, 471, 472, 473, 475, 476, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 - Sections 4, 5; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 173; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances(NDPS) Act. - Sections 15 to 24, 25-A, 27-A, 29; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3 to 5; Arms Act, 1959. ; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 ; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 ; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ; Explosives Act, 1884; Antiquities and Arts Treasures Act, 1972 ; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 ; Customs Act, 1962 ; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 ; Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 ; Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 ; Emigration Act, 1983 ; Passports Act, 1967 ; Foreigners Act, 1946 ; Copyright Act, 1957 ; Trade Marks Act, 1999 ; Information Technology Act, 2000 ; Biological Diversity Act, 2002 ; Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 ; Environment Protection Act, 1986 ; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 ; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 300-A

under the Foreigners Act, 1946Paragraph-17Offences under the Copyright Act, 1957Paragraph-18Offences under the Trade Marks Act, 1999Paragraph-19Offences under the Information Technology Act, 2000Paragraph-20Offences under the Biological Diversity Act, 2002Paragraph-21Offences under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001Paragraph-22Offences … under the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994Paragraph-13Offences under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000Paragraph-14Offences under the Emigration Act, 1983Paragraph-15Offences under the Passports Act, 1967Paragraph-16Offences under the Foreigners Act, 1946Paragraph-17Offences under the Copyright … O.C.Nos.56, 57 of 2010 on the file of the Adjudicating Authority under Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 to hear the … a decision of a learned Judge of this Court in W.P.Nos.24444 and 24445 of 2010 dated 18.11.2010 {R.Devadoss vs. Deputy Director}. It was held in

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

acts of the defendants are those of intermediatory and are protected under the provisions of Section 79 of Information Technology Act, 2000. The said provision will act as safe harbor provisions of US Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the … 18th Dec 2008 PUNJABI ALBUM Bottle Wargi Ravinder Grewal 18th Dec 2008 PUNJABI ALBUM Dont Mind Aman Riar 24th Dec 2008 HINDI FILM JAANE TU YA IMRAN KHAN, 12.12.08 JAANE NA GENELIA DSOURZA, MANDHRI PADHNIS, AIYAZ KHAN

Shervani Industrial Syndicate Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)99TTJ(All.)123

to claim the benefit of a set off, it cannot relieve the ITO of his duty to apply Section 24 in an appropriate case. (P. 928) 10. In case any clarification and/or information is required to be submitted … dt. 25th Nov., 1998). The said return was revised on 30th Nov., 2000 (hereinafter referred to as second return), to make an additional claim for … 1. The appeal has been directed by the assessee against the order under Section 263 of the Act, dt. 27th Feb., 2004, passed by the learned CIT, whereby he has cancelled the "regular assessment" order dt.