Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology act 2000 section 23 · Page 1 of about 2,084 results (0.106 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 08 2004

Orissa Consumers' Association and Anr. Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulato ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Oct-08-2004

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 179, 181, 181(3) and 182; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 23, 23(2) and 23(5); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1), 4 and 8; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Tariff for Retail Sale of Electricity) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2

Reported in : AIR2005Ori11

Gazette (Extraordinary) on 10-6-2004 they came into force. He brought to our notice that Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 provides inter alia that where notification is published in the Official Gazette, then such requirement shall be deemed … complied with before the Regulations were finally framed by the Commission. He also submitted that sub-section (5) of Section 23 of the Central General Clauses Act, 1897 provides that the publication in the Official Gazette of a rule

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2019

M/S Clues Netwrok Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Skullcandy Inc

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-04-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

of which the website of the present Appellant would be disqualified for exemption under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 („IT Act‟) since the role of its website was “more than that of an intermediary”. RFA(OS)(COMM) 1/2019 & … Thereafter, an application was filed by the Appellant under Order XIII-A CPC which was dismissed as withdrawn on 23rd February, 2017 with liberty to file a fresh application. However, on 11th May, 2017 the Court noted that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2019

M/S Clues Network Pvt Ltd vs.m/s L’oreal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-04-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

of which the website of the present Appellant would be disqualified for exemption under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 („IT Act‟) since the role of its website was “more than that of an intermediary”. RFA(OS)(COMM) 1/2019 & … Thereafter, an application was filed by the Appellant under Order XIII-A CPC which was dismissed as withdrawn on 23rd February, 2017 with liberty to file a fresh application. However, on 11th May, 2017 the Court noted that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 24 2006

Punjab State Industrial Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Decided on : Apr-24-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)292ITR268(Chd.)

(i) Usha Martin Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2003) 79 TTJ (Kol) 23 : (2003) 86 ITD 261 (Kol).CIT v. Jai Hind Investment Industries (P) … 1990-91 to 1992-93 (supra) and order of the Tribunal in the case of Mahavir Spinning Mills (supra). We first consider the main issue in these appeals relating to computation of deduction under Section 80M of the IT … constituted mainly for deciding the common issue relating to computation of deduction under Section 80M of the IT Act, 1961. Three appeals have been filed by the assessee for asst. yrs.1994-95, 1995-96 and 1997-98. The appeal of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2005

Wipro Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on : Jun-21-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Bang.)211

Explanation to Section 80HHE of the IT Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the CBDT hereby specifies the following information technology enabled products or services, as the case may be, for the purpose of said clauses, namely : includes … Systems Division, STPK/G175/97- 18-11-1997 1999-2000 1999-2000Chennai 111, Mount Road, 98/2761 Guindy, Chennai-600Pune Wipro Ltd., CTS, 685/2B STP/P/VIII(A) 10-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Gurgaon Wipro Ltd., Flat No.201, PCMG/PSE/5 19-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Mysore -- -- -- 2000-01 2000-01__________________________________________________________________________________________ was filed by the … to 266 Documents dt. 25-9-2001, 18-7-2001, 26-11-2002 , 8-1-2003, 16-12-2003, 18-2-2003 & 23-1-2004" On the basis of the aforesaid memo filed, Sri E.R. Indrakumar, learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2011

Radiological and Imaging Association Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques Rules, 2003 ; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 17, Section 4 and Rule 9; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and Rules, 1996 - Section 30, 32 rw 30, 29, 4(2)(3), 72-A, Rule 12; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 72, 5, 6, 23(2), 72 and 72 A ; Amendment Act of 2003 - Section 17(4); Evidence Act - Section 45

result into breach of confidentiality and privacy and therefore, constitute an offence punishable under section 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 14. On the other hand, Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned counsel for the Collector and District Magistrate, Kolhapur, Mr. V.D. … conducting any pre natal diagnostic techniques including ultra sonography for the purpose of detecting sex of foetus. 20. Section 23 provides that any medical geneticist, gynecologist, registered medical practitioner or any person who owning a Genetic Centre, etc.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2008

Smt. Mira Ananta Naik and ors. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax ( ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 139, 142(1), 143(3), 147, 148 to 153, 158BA to 158BC and 260A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2009)221CTR(Bom)149; [2009]183TAXMAN40(Bom)

record, the same be furnished was the request. Even this request was not acceded and on 18th Jan., 2000, reminders had to be issued by the petitioners to the Department. Finally, on 2nd Feb., 2000, the copy … 132 of the Act. It is alleged by the petitioners that the Department adopted a hyper-technical approach and informed the petitioners that the assets cannot be released until a copy of the appellate order is received by … N. Naik and his family in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 132 of the IT Act, 1961. The assets were seized. His statement

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2012

M/S. Abraham Memorial Educational Trust and Others Vs. C. Suresh Babu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-07-2012

Subject : Education

the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 85 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 149 of the Electricity Act, 2003, Section 47 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, … 11. "Person":- The word ‘person’ includes any Company or Association or body of persons, whether incorporated or not." 23. Undoubtedly, in both the enactments, the definition is inclusive. It is a well settled law, if the Legislature

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2017

State of Nct of Delhi vs.mahesh & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-12-2017

Subject : Criminal

No.2by virtue of which the respondent Mahesh was acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 67-A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as „ IT Act‟).2. At the oral request of learned APP for the State, the … State under Section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 being aggrieved by the judgment dated 23.05.2015 passed by the Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.2by virtue of which the respondent Mahesh was acquitted for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 2018

L’oreal vs.brandworld & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-12-2018

Subject : MRTP

The disqualify above alia, inter factors, the website 19. www.shopclues.com for the exemption under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as the role of the website is more than that of an intermediary.20. No.2, Shopclues.com: Thus, the suit … filed by Defendant No.2, which were withdrawn with liberty to file fresh applications, as noted in order dated 23rd February, 2017. However, vide order dated 11th May, 2017, the court noted that the Defendant No.2 decided not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial