Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology act 2000 section 17 · Page 1 of about 2,553 results (0.128 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 24 2006

Firos Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-24-2006

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 81; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act - Sections 60 and 61; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

J.B. Koshy, J.1. Appellant/petitioner approached this Court for declaring that Section 70 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is unconstitutional and unenforceable and also for issuance of a writ of … discriminatory and violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and against the statutory right conferred under Section 17 of the Copyright Act.3. Before going into the contentions raised, we may extract Section 70 of the Information

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2010

Aruna Kashinath Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Decided on : May-28-2010

Subject : Right to Information

records, documents and all electronic records pertaining to the aforesaid contraventions and violations of the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as amended using computers, computer systems, computer networks, computer resources and communication devices of the respondents as well … Signature) Certificate under section 24; (m) “Controller” means the Controller of Certifying Authorities appointed under sub-section (1) of section 17. Clause (n) of Section 2 of the IT Act defines the Cyber Appellate Tribunal as under:- (n) “Cyber

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2010

Mascon Global Limited Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Decided on : May-28-2010

Subject : Right to Information

records, documents and all electronic records pertaining to the aforesaid contraventions and violations of the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as amended using computers, computer systems, computer networks, computer resources and communication devices of the respondents as well … Signature) Certificate under section 24; (m) “Controller” means the Controller of Certifying Authorities appointed under sub-section (1) of section 17. Clause (n) of Section 2 of the IT Act defines the Cyber Appellate Tribunal as under:- (n) “Cyber

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 03 2016

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-03-2016

Subject : Right to Information

FIR No.24/2012 under Section 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) was registered against the petitioners by Cyber Police Headquarters, Bhopal, M.P. The respondent no.2, … learned Magistrate at Bhopal and the petitioner No.2 was enlarged on bail after being in custody for about 17 days and the petitioner no.1 was released after more than three weeks. There is allegation that they were

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2012

Commissioner of Customs and Central Exci Vs. M/S. Deloitte Tax Servaic ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-27-2012

Subject : Service Tax

such services. He also relied upon the definition of the term "data" in Section 2 (O) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and contended that the activity of the assessee is in relation to operation of computer systems and therefore

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2004

Cambrian Hall Educational Trust Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-11-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Delhi)838

estimate. His address as stated by the assessee is R. Kumar & Co., Karanpur, Dehradun,. As per the information of the Department, the address is 76, Khurbura Mohalla, Dehradun,. He is not traceable at either of the … issued notice under Section 148 of the IT Act on 24th Aug., 2000. The learned counsel for the assessee requested for inspection of the file … AO are recorded above in this order as well as on pp.16, 17 and 18 of the assessment order. We may state that even before … 7. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) erred in holding the action of the AO in using, against the appellant while passing the assessment order, the statements of S/Shri R.C.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2011

Radiological and Imaging Association Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques Rules, 2003 ; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 17, Section 4 and Rule 9; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and Rules, 1996 - Section 30, 32 rw 30, 29, 4(2)(3), 72-A, Rule 12; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 72, 5, 6, 23(2), 72 and 72 A ; Amendment Act of 2003 - Section 17(4); Evidence Act - Section 45

result into breach of confidentiality and privacy and therefore, constitute an offence punishable under section 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 14. On the other hand, Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned counsel for the Collector and District Magistrate, Kolhapur, Mr. V.D. … Magistrate, Kolhapur has filed affidavit-in-reply dated 28 February 2011 submitting, interalia, as under:- 5.1 Vide notifications issued under Section 17 of the Act, the Collectors and District Magistrates as well as Civil Surgeons or Deans of Medical Colleges

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 24 2009

Ashwinbhai Somabhai Patel and anr. Vs. Nrugendraprasadji Ajendraprasad ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-24-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1, 3, 65, 65(1), 65(A), 65(B), 65B(1), 65(2) and 65B(2); Information Technology Act, 2000; Registration Act - Sections 17; Information Technology (Certifying Authorities) Rules, 2000; Information Technology (Qualification and Experience of Adjudicating Officer and manner on holding inquiry) Rules, 2003; Information Technology (Security Procedure) Rules, 2004; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Civil Practice Rules- Rule 60; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2009)3GLR2352

Video CD. There is no evidence to suggest that it is electronic record as per the provisions of Information Technology Act, 2000 and as per Sections 65A and B or amended Evidence Act.(iii) The documents produced vide Exh. 54/1 does … It is submitted that for example unregistered of the document of the transfer of property requiring registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act, cannot be looked into for the purpose of interim injunction application.Shri S.N. Shelat, learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2005

Kalyani Sales Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-08-2005

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 13(8), 13(10), 14, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(6), 17(7), 18A, 18(1), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(8), 19(25), 31, 34, 35, 37, 38(2), 40 and 40(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - 1(4), 2, 3, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 17, 19, 19(1) and 31; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 - Sections 10, 12, 17 and 18; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2000; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 31; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR2006P& H107; I(2006)BC1; (2006)142PLR1; [2006]70SCL177(Punj& Har)

may, by notification and in the Electronic Gazette as defined in clause (s) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), make rules for carrying out the provisions of this Act.(2) In particular, and without prejudice … Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, would have the jurisdiction to entertain an application contemplated Under Section 17 of the Act in respect of the debts less than Rs.10 lacs but more than Rs.1 lac ?3.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2014

Argued By:- Mr. Arun JaIn Senior Advocate with Vs. Baljit Singh and Ot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-04-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

No doubt, in terms of amendment introduced in Section 3-A of the Evidence Act vide enactment of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short the IT Act), the definition of documentary evidence has been amended to include all documents including … the same meaning as is assigned to it under the IT Act.25. Even the definition of admission in Section 17 of the Evidence Act accordingly has been changed to include a statement in oral, documentary or electronic form

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial