Advanced Search Results

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

FIR No.24/2012 under Section 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) was registered against the petitioners by Cyber Police Headquarters, Bhopal, M.P. The respondent no.2, … must follow the order. The duty certificate was granted to me on 26.11.2012, on which Report No.567 time 16.30 was registered, in which there are clear directions. In compliance with this order, we reached Kondwa Police Station

P.R. Transport Agency Through Its Partner Sri Prabhakar Singh Vs. Unio ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 16(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 13(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 - Order 41 Rule 27(1) - Order 47 Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : AIR2006All23; 2006(1)AWC504

no fixed point either of transmission or of receipt.8. Anticipating the difficulties likely to arise from this, the Information Technology Act, 2000 in Section 13(3) provides as follows :-'(3) Save as otherwise agreed to between the originator and the addressee, … or in suits for specific performance of contracts where the pleadings of 'readiness and willingness' required under Section 16(1)(c) of the Specific Relief Act has not been made originally in the plaint and is sought to be

Anu Shanthi vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.9. As per the impugned … of PW1, and Swasthika, aged 3 ½ years, the daughter of PW1, and attempted murder of PW1 on 16.04.2014 in their residential house bearing No. 3/173 of Attingal Municipality.2. PW1, an engineer by profession, working at Moozhiyar,

Nino Mathew vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.9. As per the impugned … of PW1, and Swasthika, aged 3 ½ years, the daughter of PW1, and attempted murder of PW1 on 16.04.2014 in their residential house bearing No. 3/173 of Attingal Municipality.2. PW1, an engineer by profession, working at Moozhiyar,

State of Kerala vs Nino Mathew

Court : Kerala

4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.9. As per the impugned … of PW1, and Swasthika, aged 3 ½ years, the daughter of PW1, and attempted murder of PW1 on 16.04.2014 in their residential house bearing No. 3/173 of Attingal Municipality.2. PW1, an engineer by profession, working at Moozhiyar,

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT DECLARING THAT SECTION 79(3)(b) OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (IT ACT) DOES NOT CONFER AUTHORITY TO ISSUE INFORMATION BLOCKING ORDERS UNDER THE IT ACT, AND FURTHER DECLARE … interest by the Indian public. Section 79 was enacted 25 years ago and Section 79(3)(b) comes into effect 16 years ago. Section 79(3)(b) now has given a cue to several officers to direct blocking of content from

Tirumala Devi Eada and Others Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Law (La ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

in the A.P. State Gazette is immaterial. At the outset, we may refer to Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000: “8. Publication of rule, regulation, etc., in Electronic Gazette:- Where any law provides that any rule, regulation, order, … order preferably in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare G.O.Ms.No.132, Law (LA and J SC.F) Department dated 16 Nov 11 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law wholly unconstitutinal and quash the

Doly Prabhat Maithy vs State by

Court : Karnataka

cause an inquiry to be made as to the correctness of the information received under sub-section (1) of Section 16, the age, character and antecedents … age, are they to be dealt with under the IT Act, 1956 or in accordance with the JJ Act, 2000? In order to find answers to the questions arising in the present case, we may firstly consider the … the Act. It reads as follows: “17. Intermediate custody of persons removed under Section 15 or rescued under Section 16.-(1) When the special police officer removing a personunder sub-section (4) of Section 15 or a police officer rescuing

Cambrian Hall Educational Trust Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Delhi)838

estimate. His address as stated by the assessee is R. Kumar & Co., Karanpur, Dehradun,. As per the information of the Department, the address is 76, Khurbura Mohalla, Dehradun,. He is not traceable at either of the … issued notice under Section 148 of the IT Act on 24th Aug., 2000. The learned counsel for the assessee requested for inspection of the file … reasons in support of his findings in the assessment order at pp. 16 to 18. The reasons for making addition of Rs. 5,99,500 have been … 7. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) erred in holding the action of the AO in using, against the appellant while passing the assessment order, the statements of S/Shri R.C.

income Tax Officer Vs. Lanyard Foods Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)112TTJ(Mum.)334

These two appeals are of Revenue for asst. yrs. 1997-98 and 1999 2000 directed against two separate orders of CIT(A)-X, Mumbai, dt. 4th June, 2003 … 1997-98.For the sake of convenience, both these appeals and cross-objection are being disposed of by this common order.2. First, we take up the Revenue's appeal for asst. yr. 1997-98 in ITA No. 5549/Mum/2003. On the facts and … erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 3,24,16,500 made by the AO under Section 68 of the IT Act as unexplained share capital.4. The learned Departmental Representative supported the assessment order and reliance was placed on the