Advanced Search Results

P.R. Transport Agency Through Its Partner Sri Prabhakar Singh Vs. Unio ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 16(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 13(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 - Order 41 Rule 27(1) - Order 47 Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : AIR2006All23; 2006(1)AWC504

no fixed point either of transmission or of receipt.8. Anticipating the difficulties likely to arise from this, the Information Technology Act, 2000 in Section 13(3) provides as follows :-'(3) Save as otherwise agreed to between the originator and the addressee,

Ece Industries Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)111TTJ(Delhi)11

copy of the application form has been filed on pp. 124 to 126 of the paper book. Relevant information given in column 16 is as under: 16. The lamp unit of the company at Sonepat is being … been brought within the purview of Section 50B which has been brought on the statute w.e.f. 1st April, 2000. Section 50B could not be made applicable to the assessee's case during the asst. yr. 1997-98. Such provision being … which is part of the agreement and which is available at pp. 13 to 16 of the paper book. In the list of items included … profit for the current year.3.3 The AO invoked Section 50 of IT Act and issued a notice to the assessee vide letter dt. 29th Jan.,

Pushpanjali Tie Up Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Renudevi Choudhary and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

respondent No.3 had knowledge of the order on 29.10.2013 itself. 16. Mr.Setalvad relied upon section 13(2)(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) to contend that respondent No.3 must be deemed to have had knowledge of the ad-interim order

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

petition and thereby quashed the chargesheet dated 19.09.2023 filed for the offences punishable under Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, the “IT Act”) and Section 15(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 … Whether the Presumption under Section 30 of the POCSO can be resorted to in a Quashing Proceeding?. ..................................................................................... 130 iv. Whether the case at hand was one fit for the High Court to quash?......... 141 a. Plea

Rajiv Dinesh Gadkari Through P.A. Depamala Gadkari Vs. Smt. Nilangi Ra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9 and 13(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Family Court Act, 1984 - Sections 13; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3 Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4629

Crime Investigation Cell, Mumbai and the FIR is registered on 20th September, 2003 under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.13. During the course of hearing, learned Counsel for the respondent has fairly submitted that she has no

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This … copy of notice is at Annexure C and reply thereto is at Annexure D to the Writ Petition. 13 In paragraphs 10 and 11 of this Writ Petition, this is what is alleged: “10. Prataprao Govind Pawar

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

regional, national and international brands and retailers. 4.2. Snapdeal is ‘intermediary’ as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’). An Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 … Tablets 100 mg), during the Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 8 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 period between 13.10.2014 and 16.12.2014, 4.17.3. Snapdeal warned Accused No.1 not to sell the said tablets on the Website. It is

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

regional, national and international brands and retailers. 4.2. Snapdeal is ‘intermediary’ as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’). An Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 … Tablets 100 mg), during the Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 8 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 period between 13.10.2014 and 16.12.2014, 4.17.3. Snapdeal warned Accused No.1 not to sell the said tablets on the Website. It is

Syed AsifuddIn and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1) and 65; Income Tax Act - Sections 65 and 66; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 405, 409, 415 and 420

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)96; 2005CriLJ4314

under Sections 409, 420 and 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, IPC), Section 65 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, IT Act) and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short, Copyright Act).2. The crime … is not the essential object of the rental;(c) and (d) omitted.28. Therefore, reading Section 2(o), (ffc) and Sections 13 and 14 together, it becomes clear that a computer programme is by very definition original literary work and,

Radiological and Imaging Association Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques Rules, 2003 ; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 17, Section 4 and Rule 9; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and Rules, 1996 - Section 30, 32 rw 30, 29, 4(2)(3), 72-A, Rule 12; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 72, 5, 6, 23(2), 72 and 72 A ; Amendment Act of 2003 - Section 17(4); Evidence Act - Section 45

result into breach of confidentiality and privacy and therefore, constitute an offence punishable under section 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 14. On the other hand, Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned counsel for the Collector and District Magistrate, Kolhapur, Mr. V.D. … Observer' among others. 3. This issues with the approval of competent authority." Sd/- Director (PNDT Division) Rival Submissions 13. At the hearing of the petition, the learned advocate as well as the learned counsel for the petitioner