Advanced Search Results

Orissa Consumers' Association and Anr. Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulato ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 179, 181, 181(3) and 182; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 23, 23(2) and 23(5); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1), 4 and 8; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Tariff for Retail Sale of Electricity) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2

Reported in : AIR2005Ori11

Gazette (Extraordinary) on 10-6-2004 they came into force. He brought to our notice that Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 provides inter alia that where notification is published in the Official Gazette, then such requirement shall be deemed … A.K. Patnaik, J.1. The petitioner No. 1 is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 with the object of protecting the right, interest

Dr. Prakash Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32; ;Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention of Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, (Forest-Offenders), Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-Grabbers for Preventing their Dangerous Activities Prejudicial to the Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1982 - Sections 3(1); ;Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; ;Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 4 and 6; ;Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2002SC3533; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)275; 2002CriLJ4721; (2002)7SCC759; 2002(2)LC1501(SC)

respondent herein. The main ground of detentionare that the petitioner was indulging in offences under Section67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Sections 4 and 6of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act,1986 and under Section 27 of the Arms … 32 of the Constitution of Indiachallenging the said detention.2. While the petitioner was a remand prisoner in CrimeNo. 1466/2001 of Vadapalani Police Station, he was detainedunder Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention ofBootleggers, Drug-Offenders, (Forest-Offenders),

Avnish Bajaj Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67 and 85; ;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 140; ;Employees' Provident Fund (Miscellaneous Provision) Act, 1952 - Sections 14A; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 10; Iron and Steel Control Order, 1956; ;Communications Decency Act; ;Telecommunications Act, 1996; ;Child Online Protection Act, 1998; ;Children Internet Protection Act, 2003; ;Criminal Justice and Public Order Act, 1994; ;Protection of Children Act, 1978; ;Protection of Children (Amendment) Act, 1994; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 32, 35, 292, 292(1), 292(2), 294, 405 and 406; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 91, 190(1), 173(2), 204, 319 and 482; Water (Prevention and Control

Reported in : 150(2008)DLT769; 2008(105)DRJ721

an obscene product within the meaning of Section 292 Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act 2000 (IT Act). This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ('CrPC') also raises questions … the Information Technology Act 2000 (IT Act). This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ('CrPC') also raises questions concerning the criminal liability of directors for the offences attributable to a company, both

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

acts of the defendants are those of intermediatory and are protected under the provisions of Section 79 of Information Technology Act, 2000. The said provision will act as safe harbor provisions of US Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the … (b) cinematograph films, and (c) [sound recordings] (2) Copyright shall not subsist in any work specified in sub section (1), other than a work to which the provisions of Section 40 or Section 41 apply, unless- (i) In

Varghese Mathew @ Ajinithya vs State

Court : Kerala

is facing prosecution for having committed offences punishable under Sections 505(1)(b) of the IPC, Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and Section 118(e) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011.2. The short facts of the case are under:-On August

Vishal Paper Tech India Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of A.P. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 406, 415, 417, 418, 420 and 423; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 156(3) and 482; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 1; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Information Technology Act, 2000

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD(Cri)210; 2005CriLJ1838

Obviously keeping in view the said fact recent enactment like Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and Information Technology Act, 2000 prescribe fine in lakhs of rupees for the offences committed under those enactments. But the fine prescribed in … but had also, fraudulently, invoked the bank guarantees without returning them, and hence are liable for punishment under Section 120-B, 406, 417, 418 and 420 read with 34, IPC. The said complaint was referred to police for … guarantees without returning them, and hence are liable for punishment under Section 120-B, 406, 417, 418 and 420 read with 34, IPC. The said complaint

Ujjal Dasgupta Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 13(3) and 14; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 2(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 126; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 158, 161, 161(3), 164, 170, 173, 173(2) to 173(6), 207, 482 and 548; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 201 and 409; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2008(103)DRJ349

Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ('EA') and Sections 2(o) read with Section 2(1) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 ('IT Act'). She submitted that the prosecution would have no objection to providing the petitioner the following documents:(i)

Firos Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 81; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act - Sections 60 and 61; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

J.B. Koshy, J.1. Appellant/petitioner approached this Court for declaring that Section 70 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is unconstitutional and unenforceable and also for issuance of a writ of

Syed AsifuddIn and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1) and 65; Income Tax Act - Sections 65 and 66; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 405, 409, 415 and 420

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)96; 2005CriLJ4314

under Sections 409, 420 and 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, IPC), Section 65 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, IT Act) and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short, Copyright Act).2. The crime … Rao, J.1. These two petitions are filed by different persons under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. P. C.) seeking similar relief. Both the matters were admitted on the same day and since then

Dr. L. Prakash Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum grabbers Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 5; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 4, 6 and 41; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Income Tax Act; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Tamil Nadu prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-grabbers (Conditions of Detention) Order, 1986

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2596

by the Inspector of Police, R8 Vadapalani Police Station, Chennai for various offences, particularly Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 4 read with Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 and Section 120-B of … ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. Dr. L. Prakash, a detenu under Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral