Advanced Search Results

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

be deemed to be “electronic record” and “sensitive personal data or information”, and the provisions contained in the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000) and the rules made thereunder shall apply to such information, in addition to, and to … by the Central Government.” Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 30 of 56729) Chapter II of the Act deals with enrolment. Section 3 in this Chapter entitles every resident to obtain the … PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.2524 OF2014WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.37 OF2015Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 1 of 567 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.220

Aruna Kashinath Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

records, documents and all electronic records pertaining to the aforesaid contraventions and violations of the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as amended using computers, computer systems, computer networks, computer resources and communication devices of the respondents as well … Adjudicating Officer. It reads as under:- 46. Power to adjudicate.- (2) For the purpose of adjudging under this Chapter whether any person has committed a contravention of any of the provisions of this Act or of any

Mascon Global Limited Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

records, documents and all electronic records pertaining to the aforesaid contraventions and violations of the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as amended using computers, computer systems, computer networks, computer resources and communication devices of the respondents as well … Adjudicating Officer. It reads as under:- 46. Power to adjudicate.- (2) For the purpose of adjudging under this Chapter whether any person has committed a contravention of any of the provisions of this Act or of any

Subhash Chand Chopra Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)92TTJ(Delhi)1087

a result of search or requisition of books of account or other documents and such other materials or information as are available with the AO and relatable to such evidence." 7. We, after considering the above provisions, … AO and the material pointed out by parties in their paper books.6. Chapter XIV-B starts with s, 158B and provides the definition of "block period" … to 1996-97 upto the period 13th Oct., 1995, passed under Section 143(3) r/w Section 158BC of the IT Act.2. Since large number of issues are involved in this appeal, therefore, it is necessary to reproduce all the … Bank of Baroda. According to the enquiries, for the draft Nos. 0005745, 20005754 which were purchased by the assessee from Bank of India and draft

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Tea Agency Trading Centre

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)88ITD96(Gau.)

losses for asst. yr. 1992-93 against the appellant's income for asst. yr. 1993-94." 2. In respect of the first ground of appeal, the relevant facts are as follows. The AO observed that the assessee has claimed Rs. … only. Further, Section 45(1A) was inserted in the Act w.e.f. 1st April, 2000, and the same was not applicable in the year under consideration. Hence, … of the provisions of Section 43(6)(c) r/w Expln. 4 in the same Chapter of the Act for arriving WDV of such assets which in this … Rs. 29,48,511 was an additional benefit derived in the course of the business under Section 28 of the Act. In this view of the matter, be added Rs. 29,48,511 to the income of the assessee for the

P. Govinda Satyanarayana Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Vizag

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)98TTJVisakha908

the block period. The relevant portion of the statement is reproduced as under: "17 Q. As per the information available with us you have invested Rs. 6.12 lakhs as share capital and Rs. 31.5 lakhs as unsecured … Feb., 2000, which were presumed by the AO to have been recorded under Section 132(4) of the IT Act. Vide statement dt. 10th Feb., 2000, the assessee made a disclosure of Rs. 30.29 lakhs as unaccounted income … of the investments made as undisclosed income are outside the scope of Chapter XIV-B of the IT Act. Although the search and seizure has taken … by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A), dt. 13th Sept., 2002, block assessment made by the AO under Section 158BC has been challenged.2.

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Borosil Glass Works Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Mum.)361

required to be carried forward in the computation of income under the provisions of IT Act, other than Chapter XII-B which contains Section 115J. In our view, on plain reading of Section 115J(2), there is no doubt … ground raised in this appeal It relates to interpretation of the provisions of Section 115J(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : 3. For the asst. yr. 1988-89,

Ellenbarrie Industrial Gases Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)83ITD111(Kol.)

the search was deferred for a collateral purpose. In the instant case, in the absence of any definite information about the actual state of affairs, we are not in a position to come to the conclusion which … in which it was held that once the search is complete under Chapter XIV-B of the IT Act all additions should be made only in … the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the assessee-company on 22nd Jan., 1997

Babros Machinery Mfrs. (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)84ITD91(Ahd.)

be considered as undisclosed income of the assessee for the purpose of Chapter XIV-B. It was pleaded that the reason for holding that the sales … is asst. yrs, 1986-87 to 1995-96 and 1st April, 1995 to 8th Sept., 1995.3. In respect of the first point of difference, the facts as noted by the AO are as under: "Undisclosed income for asst. yr. … the AO who is Dy. CIT(A) Special Range-2, Ahmedabad, under Section 158BD r/w Section 158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961 for the Block Period asst. yrs. 1986-87 to 1995-96 and 1st April, 1995 to 8th Sept., 1995.2.

Vijay Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HH

Reported in : (2004)190CTR(Raj)90; [2004]270ITR175(Raj)

may also be noted that there are a number of provisions under Chapter VI-A, some of which refer to the term 'profit and gains' and … balance will go for the purpose of computation of total income of the assessee. It is not that first the income of both the units will be clubbed and then deduction under Section 80HH is to be … to Section 80HH in asst. yrs. 1979-80 and 1980-81.2. On an application under Section 256(1) of the IT Act, the Tribunal has referred the following questions for the opinion of this Court:For asst. yr. 1979-80 :'Whether, on