Advanced Search Results

Ellenbarrie Industrial Gases Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)83ITD111(Kol.)

the search was deferred for a collateral purpose. In the instant case, in the absence of any definite information about the actual state of affairs, we are not in a position to come to the conclusion which … in which it was held that once the search is complete under Chapter XIV-B of the IT Act all additions should be made only in … the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the assessee-company on 22nd Jan., 1997 … were sold to both the concerns for the total amount of Rs. 16,38,000 in each case comprising of the actual sale price of Rs. 15,75,000

L.G. Electronics Inc. Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)84TTJ(Delhi)1029

on 20th Aug., 1998, the Asstt.CIT, Delhi Circle 23(1), vide his letter dt. 28th Aug., 1998, sought certain information pertaining to the survey. On account of the survey carried out, it appears that the assessee got aware … the penalty in the instant case was levied only on 27th July, 2000, which is well beyond the prescribed time-limit under Section 275(5) of the … default of failure to deduct tax properly in terms of provisions under Chapter XVII-B of the Indian IT Act. You are, therefore, required to show … the learned Departmental Representative that the letter dt. 16th Feb., 1999, is to seek certain information and … March, 2001; confirming the order of the AO who had imposed penalty under Section 271C of the IT Act. Except in Appeal No. 2925/Del/2001, which is for the asst. yr. 1998-99 and which has two additional grounds,

Secure Meters Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

yr. 1992-93 is directed against the order of CIT(A), Udaipur dt. 21st July, 1994, whereby he confirmed the action of AO in allowing deduction under ss. 80HHC and 80HHE (in Chapter VI-A) only after considering the brought … earlier also taken a similar view in its decision dt. 8th February, 2000 in ITA No. 667/Jp/1993 for asst. yr. 1986-87 in the case of … from 80HH to 80VV. He has contended that accordingly all brought forward losses will have to be deducted first before allowing relief of special deduction.6. In the rejoinder, the learned authorised representative of assessee has contended that

The Commissioner of Income Tax and Another Vs. V.S. Dempo and Co. Pvt. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

a foreign company, any sum, whether or not chargeable under the provisions of this Act, shall furnish the information relating to payment of such sum, in such form and manner, as may be prescribed. (7) Notwithstanding anything … in favour of the assessees and against the Revenue. .. 52. Lastly, in the case of GE India Technology Centre Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. reported in (2010) 10 SCC 29 the Hon'ble … non-resident shipping companies. It provides for determination and collection of tax. Thus, Chapter XVI of the Act in respect of deducting tax at source would … not a "resident" and for the purpose of ss. 92, 93 and 168, includes a person who is not ordinarily resident within the meaning of

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Concord Pharmaceuticals

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 37(4), 90, 90(2), 119, 253(2), 260A, 263, 268A, 268A(1), 268A(4), 268A(5) and 275(1); Finance Act, 2008; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 3(1A) and 60; Income Tax Rules - Rule 47; Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963 - Rules 6 to 15

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(Guj)117; [2009]317ITR395(Guj)

is also contended that the CBDT Instruction No. 1985, dt. 29th June, 2000 clarifies the Instruction No. 1979/F. No. 279/126/1998-ITJ, dt. 27th March, 2000 and … also taken into account. The Board has also clarified that where a question of law arises for the first time before the High Court concerned, it should be contested irrespective of revenue involved. Where an adverse judgment … The Revenue has filed tax appeals Nos. 1402 to 1405 of 2007 under Section 260A of the IT Act 1961 for asst. yrs. 1995-96 and 1996-97 proposing to formulate the following substantial question of law for determination … of appeal/application for reference by any IT authorities under the provisions of Chapter-XX of the Act. It is, therefore, urged that the Tribunal has rightly … (Instruction Nos. 1573, dt. 12th July, 1984 and 1612, dt. 6th April, 1985). The Board has, however,

Datamatics Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)110ITD24(Mum.)

under Section 148 was issued to the assessee only on 27th Dec, 2000, and the assessee filed its revised returns within the time allowed by … is no bar to allow deduction under two sections forming part of Chapter VI-A, in respect of same receipts.It was submitted, deduction under Section 80HHE … doubtful advances given to the employees who were sent abroad on company's project but left the company without informing.Such advances could not be recovered and the assessee was forced to write off. This is a loss incidental … v. ITO (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court held : "when a notice under Section 148 of the IT Act, 1961, is issued, the proper course of action for the noticee is to file the return and if

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Jaipur Stock Exchange

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)108TTJ(JP.)393

from the total income is, for the purpose of the exemptions under Chapter III. The amount of depreciation debited to the accounts of the charitable … of the assessee. The dec- v. CIT (1980) 16 CTR (Raj) 58 laration merely confers power : … the assessee mainly for the reason that the assessee was allowed exemption under Section 11 for the very first year of the commencement of the activities of the assessee for the asst. yr.1988-89 by the Tribunal but … has erred in holding the assessee company as a charitable institution as per Section 2(15) of the IT Act, 1961 and directing the AO to treat the same accordingly.In ground No. 2, the Department is aggrieved that … learned CIT(A), dt. 14th July, 2003 for the asst. yrs. 1995-96 and 2000-01, respectively.The assessee has filed two cross-objections against these appeals.Since the issues in

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

be deemed to be “electronic record” and “sensitive personal data or information”, and the provisions contained in the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000) and the rules made thereunder shall apply to such information, in addition to, and to … by the Central Government.” Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 30 of 56729) Chapter II of the Act deals with enrolment. Section 3 in this Chapter entitles every resident to obtain the … accuracy Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 16 of 567 rates of using fingerprints to authenticate identities. The study conducted

Union of India Vs. M/S g.s. Chatha Rice Mills

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

1962 Precedent Interpreting ‘day’ and ‘date’ Notification under Section 8A of the Customs Tariff Act General Clauses Act Information Technology Act, 2000 Effect of notifications issued in e-gazettes Retrospectivity Summation 6 PART A1A2Leave granted. The aftermath of Pulwama A terrorist … Section 8A of the Customs Tariff Act 1975.3 By this notification, a new tariff entry was introduced in Chapter 98 of Section XXI in the following terms: (1) “9806 00 00 (2) All goods originating in or … A terrorist attack took place at Pulwama on 14 February 2019. On 16 February 2019, the Union Government issued a notification under Section 8A of

Kaushal Kishor Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh Govt. Of U.p. Home Secre ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

courts will strike down such law.” In Shreya Singhal, there was a challenge to Section 66-A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which was struck down as being violative of Article 19(1)(a) and was not saved under 24 Article 19(2) … inner sphere of the individuals from interference by both the State and non­State actors”.102. Before we conclude this chapter, we must point out that some academics feel that the same level of justification for infringement by the … Tamil Nadu104, which dealt with khap panchayats, this Court opined in paragraph 16 as follows:­ “16. Ultimately, the question which ought to consider and assess