Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: inflammable substances act 1952 section 5 · Page 1 of about 44 results (0.035 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 10 2001

Satish Maganlal Vora Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-10-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6) and 297; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 6-A, 6B(1) and 7; Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Regulation of Supply and Distribution and Prevention of Malpractices) Order, 1988; Petroleum Act, 1934 - Sections 2, 5, 5(2) and 30; Petroleum Rules, 1976 - Rules 163(1) and 198-A; Inflammable Substance Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Regulation of Supply and Distribution and Prevention of Malpractice's) (Amendment) Order, 1998; Bombay Sales of Motor Spirit Taxation Act, 1958; Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Prevention of Malpractices in Supply and Distribution) Order, 1990; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Solvent Raffinate and Slop (Acquisition, Sale, Storage and Prevention of Use i

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2192

as dangerously inflammable substance under Section 30 of the Petroleum Act, 1934 and under Section 3 of the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952), is nothing short of dodging the statutory meaning of the word 'petroleum'.16. The purpose underlying the impugned Order … liquid hydrocarbon or mixture of hydrocarbons, and, any inflammable mixture (liquid, viscous or solid) containing any liquid hydrocarbon. Section 5 of the Petroleum Act, 1934 provides that no one shall produce, refine or blend petroleum save in accordance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2002

Simranjit Singh Mann Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-21-2002

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(5), 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 to 35 and 36 to 64; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 167, 438; Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 4; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952; Arms Act, 1959; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3368

under Section 4. Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, the Arms Act, 1959 with an 'intent to aid any terrorist' is made 'punishable with imprisonment for a … made 'punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to imprisonment for life' and also fine under Section 5. Holding of proceeds of terrorism has been made illegal and these are made liable to be forfeited under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1993

Bijender Kumar Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-11-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 4(2), 5 and 6; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25; Explosive Act, 1884; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482; Arms Rules, 1962

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2210

rule made under the Arms Act, 1959, the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, then such person shall be liable to punishment which may extend to imprisonment for life but which shall … Procedure has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 12-10-1992 by which a charge under Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been framed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 13 1986

Sh. Ramesh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-13-1986

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1988CriLJ105

rule made under the Arms Act, 1959, the Explosives Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, or the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, as may be notified in this behalf by the Central Government or by a State Government, he shall, … ORDERM.M. Punchhi, J.1. The petitioner is accused of an offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act, for allegedly he was found in possession of a country-made pistol. Section 6

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1965

Lalji Mulji Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-21-1965

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Reported in : (1965)67BOMLR484

Legislature of 1934.9. In addition to the Petroleum Act, 1934, the Parliament had passed another enactment known as 'Inflammable Substances Act, 1952' (Act No. XX of 1952). It will be recalled that Entry No. 53 of List I, Seventh Schedule, … Naik, J.1. The appellant, who would hereafter be called the accused, was convicted under Section 471 read with Section 394(1)(a)(ii) of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act and sentenced to pay a fine of … final decision.2. The accused has been keeping lubricating oil in Plot No, 56-58 at Mazgaon without a valid permit from the Municipal Commissioner, On November

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 1981

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-ii Vs. Distillers Trading Corp ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-04-1981

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1982)27CTR(Del)56; [1982]137ITR894(Delhi)

that a person whose official duties require him to acquire specialized knowledge of various type of petroleum and inflammable substances had expressed a clear opinion that 'ethyl alcohol' would fall within the definition of 'Petroleum' as it is … petroleum. The AAC referred to the definition of 'petroleum' under the Petroleum Act, 1934, and the inflammable Substance Act, 1952, and, reading the two provisions together, came to the conclusion that ethyl alcohol in which the appellant dealt … was no mistake apparent from the record which could be rectified under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so as to reduce the depreciation … referring to the case of Harbsons Lal Malhotra and Sons Private Ltd. v. ITO : [1972]83ITR848(Cal) , the learned Judicial Member concluded that the provisions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2017

Lubricating Oil Dealers’ Association and Another Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-14-2017

Subject : MRTP

Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (6 of 1908), or (iii) Such dangerously inflammable substance within the meaning of the inflammable Substances Act, 1952 (20 of 1952), or (iv) Such combustible substances, or (v) Such toxic substance, As the State Government may, … Respondent No.1 or the State/Respondents, i. e., the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. M/s. Castrol India Ltd., Respondent No.6, which is a manufacturer of Lubricating … also a case of the Petitioners that the Central Government never authorised the State of West Bengal under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 to pass such a control order and the number of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2024

Hassainar.K.P. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-04-2024

petitioner’s case in this writ petition is that no notification has been issued under Section 4 of the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952 (the 1952 Act) making the provisions of the Petroleum Act, 1934 applicable to methyl alcohol and hence Ext.P5 … bad in law. The respondents have filed statements showing that there is no requirement of any notification since Section 5 of the 1952 Act clearly says that notifications which have been issued under Section 30 of the Petroleum

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 1994

Abdul Hamid Haji Mohammed Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-14-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 3(3), 6 and 18

Reported in : 1995(2)ALT(Cri)11; 1994(4)BomCR51; (1994)96BOMLR239; 1994CriLJ1447

of 1959) the Explosives Act, 1984 (4 of 1884) the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (6 of 1909) the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952 (20 of 1952) he shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any of the aforesaid Acts or the rules made … the possession of only arms and magazines by the accused unauthorisedly in a notified area may not attract section 5 of the TADA Act as can be seen from the decision in Parasram v. State of Haryana, reported

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1987

Bimal Kaur Khalsa Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-20-1987

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(2), 7, 8, 9(2), 13(2), 13(3), 16 and 17; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention Ordinance, 1987; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 9, 10, 11(2), 16, 19 and 20; Arms Act, 1959; Explosives Act, 1884; Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1988P&H95

of the provisions of Arms Act, 1959. the Explosives Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act. 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act. 1952, if the accused contravened the provisions of the said Act with intent w aid any terrorist or disruptions. … 13, S. 16 and cls. (a) and (b) of sub-sec.(2), sub-section (3). sub-section (4) and clause (b) of sub-section (5) of S. 17 of the Act. 4. Soon after the judgment in this case was reserved. the Terrorist

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial