Advanced Search Results
Satish Maganlal Vora Vs. Union of India and ors.
Gujarat
Apr-10-2001
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6) and 297; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 6-A, 6B(1) and 7; Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Regulation of Supply and Distribution and Prevention of Malpractices) Order, 1988; Petroleum Act, 1934 - Sections 2, 5, 5(2) and 30; Petroleum Rules, 1976 - Rules 163(1) and 198-A; Inflammable Substance Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Regulation of Supply and Distribution and Prevention of Malpractice's) (Amendment) Order, 1998; Bombay Sales of Motor Spirit Taxation Act, 1958; Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Prevention of Malpractices in Supply and Distribution) Order, 1990; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Solvent Raffinate and Slop (Acquisition, Sale, Storage and Prevention of Use i
(2001)3GLR2192
as dangerously inflammable substance under Section 30 of the Petroleum Act, 1934 and under Section 3 of the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952), is nothing short of dodging the statutory meaning of the word 'petroleum'.16. The purpose underlying the impugned Order … liquid hydrocarbon or mixture of hydrocarbons, and, any inflammable mixture (liquid, viscous or solid) containing any liquid hydrocarbon. Section 5 of the Petroleum Act, 1934 provides that no one shall produce, refine or blend petroleum save in accordance
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSimranjit Singh Mann Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
May-21-2002
CriminalConstitution
Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(5), 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 to 35 and 36 to 64; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 167, 438; Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 4; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952; Arms Act, 1959; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 21
2002CriLJ3368
under Section 4. Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, the Arms Act, 1959 with an 'intent to aid any terrorist' is made 'punishable with imprisonment for a … made 'punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to imprisonment for life' and also fine under Section 5. Holding of proceeds of terrorism has been made illegal and these are made liable to be forfeited under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBijender Kumar Vs. the State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-11-1993
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 4(2), 5 and 6; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25; Explosive Act, 1884; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482; Arms Rules, 1962
1993CriLJ2210
rule made under the Arms Act, 1959, the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, then such person shall be liable to punishment which may extend to imprisonment for life but which shall … Procedure has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 12-10-1992 by which a charge under Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been framed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sh. Ramesh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-13-1986
Criminal
1988CriLJ105
rule made under the Arms Act, 1959, the Explosives Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, or the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, as may be notified in this behalf by the Central Government or by a State Government, he shall, … ORDERM.M. Punchhi, J.1. The petitioner is accused of an offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act, for allegedly he was found in possession of a country-made pistol. Section 6
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLalji Mulji Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-21-1965
CriminalConstitution
(1965)67BOMLR484
Legislature of 1934.9. In addition to the Petroleum Act, 1934, the Parliament had passed another enactment known as 'Inflammable Substances Act, 1952' (Act No. XX of 1952). It will be recalled that Entry No. 53 of List I, Seventh Schedule, … Naik, J.1. The appellant, who would hereafter be called the accused, was convicted under Section 471 read with Section 394(1)(a)(ii) of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act and sentenced to pay a fine of … final decision.2. The accused has been keeping lubricating oil in Plot No, 56-58 at Mazgaon without a valid permit from the Municipal Commissioner, On November
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAddl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-ii Vs. Distillers Trading Corp ...
Delhi
Sep-04-1981
Direct Taxation
(1982)27CTR(Del)56; [1982]137ITR894(Delhi)
that a person whose official duties require him to acquire specialized knowledge of various type of petroleum and inflammable substances had expressed a clear opinion that 'ethyl alcohol' would fall within the definition of 'Petroleum' as it is … petroleum. The AAC referred to the definition of 'petroleum' under the Petroleum Act, 1934, and the inflammable Substance Act, 1952, and, reading the two provisions together, came to the conclusion that ethyl alcohol in which the appellant dealt … was no mistake apparent from the record which could be rectified under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so as to reduce the depreciation … referring to the case of Harbsons Lal Malhotra and Sons Private Ltd. v. ITO : [1972]83ITR848(Cal) , the learned Judicial Member concluded that the provisions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLubricating Oil Dealers’ Association and Another Vs. Union of India ...
Kolkata
Jul-14-2017
MRTP
Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (6 of 1908), or (iii) Such dangerously inflammable substance within the meaning of the inflammable Substances Act, 1952 (20 of 1952), or (iv) Such combustible substances, or (v) Such toxic substance, As the State Government may, … Respondent No.1 or the State/Respondents, i. e., the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. M/s. Castrol India Ltd., Respondent No.6, which is a manufacturer of Lubricating … also a case of the Petitioners that the Central Government never authorised the State of West Bengal under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 to pass such a control order and the number of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHassainar.K.P. vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Apr-04-2024
petitioner’s case in this writ petition is that no notification has been issued under Section 4 of the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952 (the 1952 Act) making the provisions of the Petroleum Act, 1934 applicable to methyl alcohol and hence Ext.P5 … bad in law. The respondents have filed statements showing that there is no requirement of any notification since Section 5 of the 1952 Act clearly says that notifications which have been issued under Section 30 of the Petroleum
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Hamid Haji Mohammed Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-14-1994
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 3(3), 6 and 18
1995(2)ALT(Cri)11; 1994(4)BomCR51; (1994)96BOMLR239; 1994CriLJ1447
of 1959) the Explosives Act, 1984 (4 of 1884) the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (6 of 1909) the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952 (20 of 1952) he shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any of the aforesaid Acts or the rules made … the possession of only arms and magazines by the accused unauthorisedly in a notified area may not attract section 5 of the TADA Act as can be seen from the decision in Parasram v. State of Haryana, reported
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBimal Kaur Khalsa Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-20-1987
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(2), 7, 8, 9(2), 13(2), 13(3), 16 and 17; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention Ordinance, 1987; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 9, 10, 11(2), 16, 19 and 20; Arms Act, 1959; Explosives Act, 1884; Explosive Substances Act, 1908
AIR1988P&H95
of the provisions of Arms Act, 1959. the Explosives Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act. 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act. 1952, if the accused contravened the provisions of the said Act with intent w aid any terrorist or disruptions. … 13, S. 16 and cls. (a) and (b) of sub-sec.(2), sub-section (3). sub-section (4) and clause (b) of sub-section (5) of S. 17 of the Act. 4. Soon after the judgment in this case was reserved. the Terrorist
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »