Advanced Search Results

Satish Maganlal Vora Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6) and 297; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 6-A, 6B(1) and 7; Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Regulation of Supply and Distribution and Prevention of Malpractices) Order, 1988; Petroleum Act, 1934 - Sections 2, 5, 5(2) and 30; Petroleum Rules, 1976 - Rules 163(1) and 198-A; Inflammable Substance Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Regulation of Supply and Distribution and Prevention of Malpractice's) (Amendment) Order, 1998; Bombay Sales of Motor Spirit Taxation Act, 1958; Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Prevention of Malpractices in Supply and Distribution) Order, 1990; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Solvent Raffinate and Slop (Acquisition, Sale, Storage and Prevention of Use i

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2192

as dangerously inflammable substance under Section 30 of the Petroleum Act, 1934 and under Section 3 of the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952), is nothing short of dodging the statutory meaning of the word 'petroleum'.16. The purpose underlying the impugned Order

Hitendra Vishnu Thakur and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 22(2); Explosive Act, 1884; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 114, 120, 147, 148, 149, 302 and 338; Terriorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 4, 6, 18, 19(1) and 20(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 57, 167(2), 173, 260(1), 262, 263-265 and 436 to 450; Indian Arms Act, 1959 - SectionS 3 and 25(1); Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952

Reported in : AIR1994SC2623; 1995CriLJ517; 1994(2)Crimes916(SC); JT1994(4)SC255; 1994(3)SCALE105; (1994)4SCC602; [1994]Supp1SCR360; 1994(2)LC786(SC); MANU/SC/0526/1994

rule made under the Arms Act 1959, the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act 1952 and renders him liable to punishment for not less than 5 years. The punishment may, in certain cases, … leave petitions (criminal) the three meaningful questions which require our consideration are: (1) when can the provisions of Section 3(1) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act. 1987. (hereinafter referred to as the TADA) be attracted? (2) Is

Bijender Kumar Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 4(2), 5 and 6; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25; Explosive Act, 1884; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482; Arms Rules, 1962

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2210

rule made under the Arms Act, 1959, the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, then such person shall be liable to punishment which may extend to imprisonment for life but which shall … Section 2(1)(h) of the Act defines the expression 'terrorist act' to have the meaning assigned to it under Section 3(1) of the Act. The relevant part of Section 3(1) provides that whoever with intent (i) to overawe the

Simranjit Singh Mann Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(5), 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 to 35 and 36 to 64; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 167, 438; Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 4; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952; Arms Act, 1959; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3368

under Section 4. Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, the Arms Act, 1959 with an 'intent to aid any terrorist' is made 'punishable with imprisonment for a … people of India i.e. right to life and liberty as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution....' Under Section 3(5), a 'person who is a member of a terrorist organization...can be arrested and punished...with life imprisonment and a

Lubricating Oil Dealers’ Association and Another Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : MRTP

Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (6 of 1908), or (iii) Such dangerously inflammable substance within the meaning of the inflammable Substances Act, 1952 (20 of 1952), or (iv) Such combustible substances, or (v) Such toxic substance, As the State Government may, … also a case of the Petitioners that the Central Government never authorised the State of West Bengal under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 to pass such a control order and the number of the order

Narendra Govind Mangela Vs. the Inspector of Police, Virar Police Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992(2)BomCR478; 1992CriLJ2711

rules made under the Arms Act, 1959, the Explosives Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, then such person shall be liable to punishment which may extend to imprisonment for life but which shall … Section 2(h) of the Act defines the expression 'terrorist act' to have the meaning assigned to it under Section 3(1) of the Act. The relevant part of Section 3(1) provides that whoever with intent (i) to overawe the

Bimal Kaur Khalsa Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(2), 7, 8, 9(2), 13(2), 13(3), 16 and 17; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention Ordinance, 1987; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 9, 10, 11(2), 16, 19 and 20; Arms Act, 1959; Explosives Act, 1884; Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1988P&H95

of the provisions of Arms Act, 1959. the Explosives Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act. 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act. 1952, if the accused contravened the provisions of the said Act with intent w aid any terrorist or disruptions. … and 888 of 1996. 3. The provisions of the said Act, the vires whereof had been challenged are Section 3(2)(i). S. 7, S. 8. sub-section (2) of S. 9, sub-section (2). sub-sec: (2) and sub-section (3) of S.

Lalji Mulji Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Reported in : (1965)67BOMLR484

Legislature of 1934.9. In addition to the Petroleum Act, 1934, the Parliament had passed another enactment known as 'Inflammable Substances Act, 1952' (Act No. XX of 1952). It will be recalled that Entry No. 53 of List I, Seventh Schedule, … 'liquid hydrocarbon or mixture of hydrocarbons'. Chapter I of the Petroleum Act, 1934, relates to 'control over petroleum'. Section 3(1) provides-No one shall import, transport or store any petroleum save in accordance with the rules made under Section

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-ii Vs. Distillers Trading Corp ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1982)27CTR(Del)56; [1982]137ITR894(Delhi)

purpose of this Act is to apply the provisions of the Petroleum Act to certain other inflammable substances. Section 3 of the Act provides that the following substances are to be considered as dangerously inflammable :(1) acetone, (2) … that a person whose official duties require him to acquire specialized knowledge of various type of petroleum and inflammable substances had expressed a clear opinion that 'ethyl alcohol' would fall within the definition of 'Petroleum' as it is … petroleum. The AAC referred to the definition of 'petroleum' under the Petroleum Act, 1934, and the inflammable Substance Act, 1952, and, reading the two provisions together, came to the conclusion that ethyl alcohol in which the appellant dealt

Hassainar.K.P. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the Petroleum Act, 1934 are applicable to the substances which have been declared to be dangerously inflammable in Section 3 of the 1952 Act. The petitioner is not entitled to any relief and the writ petition is hence … petitioner’s case in this writ petition is that no notification has been issued under Section 4 of the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952 (the 1952 Act) making the provisions of the Petroleum Act, 1934 applicable to methyl alcohol and hence Ext.P5