Advanced Search Results

Shyamal Kumar Roy Vs. Sushil Kumar Agarwal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14), 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40 and 61; Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1990; West Bengal Finance Act, 2006; West Bengal Act - Sections 33(4) and 33(5); Marwar Stamp Act, 1947; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR2007SC637; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN15; JT2006(9)SC483; (2007)1MLJ617(SC); 2006(11)SCALE159; (2006)11SCC331; 2007AIRSCW234

submitted that the application filed by Respondent herein was barred under the proviso appended to Sub-Section (5) of Section 33 of the West Bengal Act. It was further urged that Section 36 of the Indian Stamp Act has … S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of Section 36 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 ('the Act'), as amended in the State of West Bengal by Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act,

Thippareddy Obulamma and ors. Vs. Balu Narasimhulu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17 and 49; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 33 and 35; Transfer of Property Act; Specific Relief Act, 1877; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR2003AP525

13. In S. REDDY vs . JOHANPUTRA, : AIR1972AP373 while dealing with the scope of Section-35 of the Indian Stamp Act, a learned single Judge of this Court held: 'While considering the scope of Section-35 of the Indian Stamp … of admitting the same in evidence will arise only after the Court impounds the document as contemplated under Section-33 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. Under Section-33 of the Stamp Act, ....................... 16. The learned counsel for

T.Paneer Selvam Vs. the Inspector General of Registration and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Stamp

Acts : Indian Stamp Act - Section 33-A - Article 46-B (i) of Schedule I

registration fee of Rs.2,660/-. But the District Registrar issued a notice dated 8.6.2004 under Section 33-A of the Indian Stamp Act, calling upon the petitioner to pay the deficit stamp duty of Rs.2,03,552/- and deficit registration fee of Rs.19,575/-.

Shri Amrit Sachdev Vs. Shri Varendra Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 47, Rule 1; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Indian Stamp Act - Sections 33(2)

Reported in : AIR2003Delhi97; 101(2002)DLT131; 2002(64)DRJ495

this Court in compliance with the orders passed by the Court on 23.8.1999 under Section 33(2)(b) of the Indian Stamp Act. It is also prayed that the delay in the filing of the review application may be condoned. The

Ummadi Subramanyam Vs. Ekka Dhanamma and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 49; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 33, 35 and 37; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 9; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 17; Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 1877

Reported in : 1999(5)ALD26; 1999(4)ALT706

in evidence will arise only after the Court impounds the document as contemplated under Section 33 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. Under Section 33 of the Stamp Act, every person having by law or consent of parties authority

Srf Limited Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(1), 2(10), 2(14), 10, 33, 39, 47A, 56, 56(4) and 57 - Schedule - Articles 20 and 23; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A; Madhya Pradesh Indian Stamp (Amendment) Act - Sections 47A; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 147

Reported in : AIR2005MP79; 2005(1)MPLJ481

but according to the petitioner on 2-7-1996 they were informed that the Sub-Registrar has prepared certain reports Under Section 33 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. It is averred in the petition that subsequently Collector of Stamps, District … 1996 so also the order passed by the Board of Revenue, the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Annexure-T) dated 3-1-2002 and the consequential demand notices Annexure-R and Annexure-S dated 12-11-2001 and 22-12-2001 demanding stamp

G. Ramesh Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(9), 9(1), 33, 33(3), 35, 38, 40, 40(1), 45(1)(2), 56(1), 70(1), 70(2), 74, 76A and 78; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3, 3(10) and 3(11); Andhra Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1891 - Sections 3(6) and 3(8); Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2006(6)ALD136; 2006(6)ALT476

is competent to the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) to impound improperly/inadequately stamped document under Section 33 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (the Stamp Act, for brevity) and deal such important documents in accordance with Sections 38 and 40

Hariom Agrawal Vs. Prakash Chand Malviya

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14), 33, 33(1), 35, 36, 37, 48 and 48B; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act - Sections 12(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63; Indian Stamp (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1990; Madhya Pradesh Stamp Rules, 1942 - Rule 19

Reported in : AIR2007SC166; 2007(6)ALLMR(SC)930; 2007(4)AWC4121(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(4)CHN97; 2008(3)CTC457; JT2007(12)SC49; 2008(1)MPHT156(SC); 2007(11)SCALE705; (2007)8SCC514; 2007AIRSCW6368

pay back Rs.4,75,000/- to the tenant. This document was affixed with a notarial stamp of Rs.4/-. Under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (for short the Act ), agreement of this nature requires affixture of a stamp of Re.1/- under … proceed in the manner provided in this Chapter in Section 48-B has reference to Section 48 of the Act. Section 48-B only authorizes the Collector to recover the adequate stamp duty which has been avoided at the time … registered or authenticated by any such person or by any public officer, unless such instrument is duly stamped:6. Section 33 gives power to the authority to check whether the instrument has been duly stamped and in case it

Gayabai Hemlal Jadhav Vs. Hiraman S/O Rama Chavan

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Stamp

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Section 17; Bombay Stamp Act - Section 33; Indian Succession Act - Section 276; Stamp Act - Section 35

transaction affecting such property or conferring such power. The term "instrument" is defined in Section 2(14) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, as to include every document, by which any right or liability is or purports to be created, … produced for modification of the decree passed by it earlier, can be restrained from impounding the same under Section 33 of the Bombay Stamp Act, by the concerned party by withdrawing the application itself with which the said

Padmaja Ashok Vs. Dr.E.Rajyasree and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Section 18, 35, 36, 61, 42, 43, 3(c), 11, 32, 33; ndian Limitation Act - Section 10; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Section 20

23.10.1993 without collecting the stamp duty and penalty, as per Section 18 read with Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899?(iii) Whether the lower Court was justified in awarding Rs.1000/- per month towards damages for use and occupation … power of attorney is Rs 10, according to counsel on both sides. I, therefore, impound the document under Section 33 of the Act, direct the petitioner to deposit stamp duty worth Rs 10 plus the maximum penalty of