Advanced Search Results
Bhikajee Dadabhai and Company Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-04-1956
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1); Indian Income-Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 66(1), 45 and 46; Hyderabad Income-tax Act - Sections 35(3), 40, 40(1), 40(4), 57 and 58; ;Hyderabad General Clauses Act; General Clauses Act, 1897; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Land Customs Act, 1924; Central Excises Act, 1944; Indian Post Office Act, 1898; ;Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 7, 16, 19 and 38; Constitution of India - Article 227
[1958]33ITR760(AP)
1924, (3) the Indian Tariff Act, 1934, (4) the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and (5) the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, which were extended to the whole of India, except for the first four which were not extended to … Whether on October 31, 1951, the Income-tax Officer, Warangal Circle, had the power to impose a penalty under section 40(1) of the Hyderabad Income-tax Act in respect of the assessment for the year 1357F. ? 2. Whether the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-18-1998
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 39, 40 42 and 48; Land Acquisition (Company) Rules, 1963 - Sections 9, 23, 24 and 53 - Rules 3 & 4; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 6 to 16 and 18 to 37, 41 and 55; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Order 21, Rules 35, 95 and 96
1998IIIAD(SC)308; AIR1998SC1608; [1998]92CompCas373(SC); (1998)3GLR2012; JT1998(2)SC536; 1998(2)SCALE373; (1998)4SCC387; [1998]2SCR339
his last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Sections 28 and 29 of the indian Post Office Act, 1898.'9. In first special leave petition No. 12986/97, land situated in Survey No. 40, Village Mandalla, Taluk Choryasi … consent of the appropriate Government and not unless the Company shall have executed the agreement as prescribed. Under Section 40 an enquiry is to be made before the appropriate Government consents to acquisition of land for the Company.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh Vs. Bhikaji Dadabhai and Co ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-22-1961
Direct Taxation
Indian Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 11, 13(1) and 13(2); Hyderabad Income-tax Act - Sections 40, 40(1) and 42(1); Indian Income-tax Act, 1922; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Land Customs Act, 1924; Central Excise Act, 1944; Indian Post Offices Act, 1898; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1961SC1265; [1961]42ITR123(SC); [1961]3SCR923
Indian Tariff Act, 1934, the Land Customs Act, 1924, the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, and the Indian Post Offices Act, 1898, which were extended to the whole of India by s. 11 of the Finance Act, … an assessee to appeal if he objects to an order under s. 40 made by an Income-tax Officer. Section 40 ceased to have effect. There can therefore be neither an order under s. 40 nor an appeal against … 30, 1947), the assessees returned an income of Rs. 50,384/-. The Income-tax Officer found that the books of account maintained by the assessees were unreliable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Rajasthan
Jul-07-1980
Excise
Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 7(2), 18A and 40(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Articles 19(5), 140, 265, 277, 278 and 295; Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962; Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1962; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Excise Profits Tax Act - Sections 15; Finance Act , 1950 - Sections 11; Finance Act, 1959 - Sections 11; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1939; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(3) and 22(4); Indian Post Office Act, 1898; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Jaipur Excise Duties Act, 1945 - Sections 27; Jaipur Excise Duties Rules, 1945 - Rules 9, 9B, 10, 10A, 13, 25, 27, 47, 52, 101 and 160; Limitation Act - Schedule - Artic
1981(8)ELT772(Raj)
said date there is in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir a law corresponding to the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, such law is hereby repealed with effect from the said date :Provided that such repeal, shall not effect … pay the case demanded. In Public Prosecutor, Madras v. R. Raju (supra), the contention that Sub-section (2) of Section 40 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, [which is similar to Section 29(2) of the Ordinance] is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNeena Chaturvedi Vs. Public Service Commissioner
Allahabad
May-28-2009
Service
2009(4)AWC3302
why the sum could not be paid to the plaintiff. Reference was made to Section 34 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 and it was claimed that said provision absolved the Union of India from liability. In wake of aforesaid
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHari Pandurang and anr. Vs. Secretary of State for India in Council an ...
Mumbai
Apr-07-1903
Trusts and Societies
(1904)ILR27Bom276
him at his last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Part III of the Indian Post Office Act, 1866.45. Nothing has been said before us as to the public notice prescribed by the Act: nor has … certain improvements were projected in the City of Bombay, and an Act called the City of Bombay Improvement Act, 1898, was passed giving to a Board thereby constituted certain powers with a view to carry these improvements into … to be acquired.2. You should also produce on the above date, under Section 10 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, a statement in writing signed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuperintendent, Sub-post Office Vs. Madanchandra Gupta
Madya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Bhopal
Jul-05-2011
MRTP
for non delivery of the postal article and referred to the exemption granted by Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act. 1898 and Rule 66B of the Post Office Speed Post Rules. 4. Learned Counsel for the appellant has referred … for the respondent has invited attention to the judgment of the National. Commission reported in II (2009) CPJ 40 (NC)=2009 (1) CPR 286 (NC), The Branch Post Master, Village and Post Jaitpur and Ors. v. Chandra Shekhar
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHead Post Master Head Post Office, Mitidoongari Alwar, Rajasthan and A ...
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
May-21-2013
Education
the present revision petition. The main grounds of the revision petition are as follows: Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 was interpreted by this Honble Commission consistently in various judgments delivered by it from time to time clearly … “ b, condition 5 (which was published in the Gazette of India dated 21.01.1999 under G S R 40 (E): - In distribution of domestic Speed Post things, in case of delay according to laid down guidelines
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohamed Zafrul Islam Vs. Birendra Lall
Mumbai
Sep-11-1963
Motor Vehicles
Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 - Sections 1(4), 2, 13 and 38; Post Office Act, 1898; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 2(22) and 42(3); Bombay Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Sections 18
AIR1965Bom120; (1964)66BOMLR767; 1965MhLJ124
the above contention on behalf of the Respondent,. Mr. Sarobji has mainly relied upon the provisions in the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, and similar provisions in the English Act and some decisions of the English Courts relating to the functions … Motor Service. These drivers are required to work for 8 hours and 40 minutes every day and 52 hours every week. Under the provisions of … is, therefore, untenable.(4) In connection with these rival contentions, It is first necessary to notice the provisions in Sections 1(4),2(e),2(g),2(h), 13 and 38 of the Act, which run as follows :'1. (4) It (the Act) applies to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSr. Supdt. of Post Offices Nit, Faridabad and Another Vs. Mahabir Pras ...
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Jul-04-2013
Land Acquisition
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (short, District Forum) took Preliminary Objections that : Under Section 6 of œThe Indian Post Office Act, 1898?, the post office is exempted from liability for loss, misdelivery, delay or damage to any postal article in … under Indian Post Office Rules, 1933 by inserting Rule No.66B. These rules were further amended by notification GSR 40 (E) dated 21.1.1999 which inserted the following conditions under condition no.(5) of Rule 66-B -œIn case of any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »