Advanced Search Results

Dnynoba Gangaram Vs. Dattoba Balappa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Reported in : AIR1947Bom152; (1946)48BOMLR629

that is to say, on the date of the mortgage. Article 132 of the first schedule to the Indian Limitation Act requires a suit to enforce payment of money charged upon immovable property to be filed within … due, it was time-barred under Article 132 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908.;Lal Narshingh Partan v. Mohommad Yakub Khan (1989) 31 Bom. L.R. 825, P.C. … way of security, and admittedly the defendant failed to deliver possession either to Eknath or to the plaintiff. Section 68, Sub-section (1), Clause (d),, of the Transfer of Property Act, provides that a mortgagee has a right to … Dispute arose between parties - Under agreement, respondent had chosen Mumbai as port of delivery Vessel carrying Rock Phosphate was delivered at port of Bombay

Lakshman Gowroji Nakhwa Vs. Ramji Antone Nakhwa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1921Bom93; (1921)23BOMLR939

provisions as to removing obstructions and paying compensation will be found in Sections 10 and 12 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, which was amended by Act VI of 1916, but I do not think I need pursue that.64. Then … to the earth.'57. He next relies on the definition of easement in the Indian Limitation Act IX of 1908. Section 2(5) says: -Easement' includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Director of Rationing and Distribution

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Section 386 and 386(1); ;Bengal General Clauses Act, 1899 - Section 3(32); ;Constitution of India - Article 300; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction Act, 1949 - Section 8; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1955Cal282,1955CriLJ792

repealed the proviso to Section 20 goods belonging to Government were expressly exempted.Section 1(4) of the now repealed Indian Ports Act of 1889 exempted-from the operation of the. Act vessels belonging to or in the service of Her Majesty … belonging to or in the service of Her Majesty or the Government of India. Section 2(l) Indian Port Act, 1908, gave the same exemption to all vessels belonging to or in the service of His Majesty which in … the Central Legislature required the assent of the Governor General under Section 68/2 before it could become an Act and where the Governor General reserved

Divya Export Enterprises Vs. ProducIn Private Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 230; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433

Reported in : [1991]70CompCas760(Kar); ILR1990KAR1610

it makes no difference. Even if the said Will is registered under the provisions of the Indian Registration Act, 1908 whether the execution of the Will is admitted or denied, it is necessary to call an attesting witness … consider whether the Will that is executed is in accordance with Section 63 of the Act read with Section 68 of the Evidence Act. -- Section 63 r/w Section 68: Execution of a Will - Attestation and Execution … be of Tanzanian origin and the shipment was to come from Mombasa port. The price negotiated and agreed was US dollars/1,300 per metric ton, C

Rama Shah Vs. Lal Chand

Court : Mumbai

Subject : LimitationContract

Reported in : (1940)42BOMLR640

endorsement states.4. The proviso at the end of the first Sub-section of Section 20 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, was the subject of amendment made by Act I of 1927, and the amended Sub-section, stands as follows:20(1) … be preferred to the view taken in Appasami Pttlai v. Muthirian (1934) 68 M. L.J. 73 which applied the English decisions.16. The main contention of … Togo to West Coast India - Dispute arose between parties - Under agreement, respondent had chosen Mumbai as port of delivery Vessel carrying Rock Phosphate was delivered at port of Bombay - Application filed by respondent earlier

Ramdutt Ramkissen Dass Vs. E.D. Sassoon and Company

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Reported in : (1929)31BOMLR741

been brought.10. The first question of law which arises is the important general one, whether the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, applies to arbitration proceedings. The relevant section of that Act is Section 3-Subject to the provisions contained in … Togo to West Coast India - Dispute arose between parties - Under agreement, respondent had chosen Mumbai as port of delivery Vessel carrying Rock Phosphate was delivered at port of Bombay - Application filed by respondent earlier … he accordingly did, and in the end made an award of Rs. 68,574. His award, which was dated September 28, 1916, was duly filed and

R. Sarangapani and anr. Vs. the Port Trust of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 39, 39(1) and 95(4); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13(3), 19(1), 19(6) and 367; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Sea Customs Act, 1878

Reported in : AIR1961Mad234; (1961)1MLJ57

the Board the power to make by-laws not inconsistent with the provisions of the Act or of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, inter alia 'for the reception, porterage, storage and removal of goods brought within the premises of the Board … Vehicles Rules was ultra vires, as it was beyond the rule making power conferred on the Government by Section 68 of the Act. In dealing with this question, the learned Judge adverted to Section 68 of the Motor

Jsw Steel Ltd. versus the Board of Trustees of the Mumbai Port Trust M ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.701

the then Deputy Conservator of respondent no.1, which specifically states that power under Section 14(1) 1 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 2 was being exercised and the appellant (in its then avatar as ‘M/s Nippon Denro Ispat Ltd.’) was … : (2023) 13 SCC 779; Union Territory of Ladakh v. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference [2023] 12 SCR 68 : 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1140 - relied on. List of Acts Ports Act, 1908. List of Keywords

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Sections 1 and 15(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(4); Madras Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

3, Clause (k); Rubber Production and Marketing Act (XXIV [24] of 1947), Section 3 (1), Clause (v); the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (xv [15] of 1908), Section 3, Clause (8) ; Madras Act XIV [14] of 1947 Section 2, Clause … persons, even though all enjoyed the protection of due process.'As observed in Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U. S. 68'the clause does not prohibit legislation which is limited either in the objects to which it is directed orby

K.t.v. Health Food Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

major port within the meaning of Major Ports Act, 1964. Another enactment, which deals with ports, is the Indian Ports Act, 1908. The appellants would contend that, while the storage facility may not be located within the Chennai Port, it … duty and tariff valuation of any imported goods in the case of goods cleared from a warehouse, under Section 68, is declared to be the 43 date, on which, a bill for entry for home consumption, in respect