Advanced Search Results

K.t.v. Health Food Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

major port within the meaning of Major Ports Act, 1964. Another enactment, which deals with ports, is the Indian Ports Act, 1908. The appellants would contend that, while the storage facility may not be located within the Chennai Port, it … contend that, while the storage facility may not be located within the Chennai Port, it is licenced under Section 57 of the Customs Act as a customs station. In the Major Ports Act, the word ‘port’ is defined

The Trustees of the Port of Madras by Its Chairman Vs. K.P.V. Sheik Mo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 148, 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : [1963]Supp2SCR915

vessels, passengers or goods excepting the services in respect of vessels for which fees are chargeable under the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (XV of 1908).' 18. Section 44 provides that every scale and every statement of conditions framed by the … goods after two months if rates or rents are not paid or lien for freight is not discharged. Section 57 provides for the publication of the notice for sale in the case of perishable goods in the custody

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Sections 1 and 15(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(4); Madras Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

3, Clause (k); Rubber Production and Marketing Act (XXIV [24] of 1947), Section 3 (1), Clause (v); the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (xv [15] of 1908), Section 3, Clause (8) ; Madras Act XIV [14] of 1947 Section 2, Clause … to have given the Comrs. that power by implication.'An implied power for the Justices to summarily convict under Section 57, Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, 1870 was recognised in Cullen v. Trimble, (1872) 7 Q. B. 416 : (41

Tapender Singh Vs. Jai Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1), 4, 4A and 10; ;Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Section 3; ;Indian Ports Act, 1908; ;Major Port Trusts Act, 1963; ;Motor Vehicles Act; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; ;Constitution of India

Reported in : III(2004)ACC775,2005ACJ962

a member of the crew, or handling or transport within the limits of any port subject to the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (15 of 1908), or the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 (38 of 1963), of goods which have been … such, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Respondent Nos. 1 to 5-claimants filed proceedings under Section 4 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), against Satnam Singh, owner of

Awaaz Foundation, Public Charitable Trust, Mumbai and Another Vs. Stat ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Environment

The coastal areas at 48 places in the State of Maharashtra with demarcation/identification of the limits under the Indian Ports Act, 1908, have been notified. Obviously, beyond the limits of the areas covered by the Indian Ports Act, the creeks, … 2006 to the National Green Tribunal alongwith the Civil Application filed therein. The Application falls within ambit of Section 14, 15 and 18 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 and is accordingly entertained by this Tribunal.

The Food Corporation of India Vs. Collector of Customs and Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1983)LC904DTri(Chennai)

as per Rule 82( 1) of the New Mangalore Port Rules, 1976 issued under Section 5(2) of the Indian Ports Act, 1908; a certificate of port out-turn statement issued by them may be accepted as proof of landed quantity of … S.K. Choudhury, Senior Departmental Representative for the respondent, the Tribunal makes the following: 3. By his order No. 57/78-79 C. 3 dated 27.8.79, the Assistant Collector of Customs, Mangalore, rejected a claim for refund of duty on

Lakhmichand Khetsey Punja Vs. Ratanbai

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyCivil

Reported in : AIR1927Bom115; (1927)29BOMLR78

suit is brought by the widow and three minor daughters and mother of one Umersey Punja under the Indian Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 (which corresponds to Lord Campbell's Act in England), against the defendant as owner of … was a license as defined by Section 52. That being HO, it would be the defendant's duty under Section 57 to discloss any defect in the property likely to be dangerous to the licensee of which the defendant … was not this room which fell and injured Umersey, but a different portion of the building consisting of privies and wash-houses where Umersey happened to

Lakhmichand Khetsey Punja Vs. Ratanbai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 101Ind.Cas.210

suit is brought by the widow and three minor daughters and mother of one Umersey Punja under the Indian Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 (which corresponds to Lord Campbell's Act in England), against the defendant as owner of … was a license as defined by Section 52[D]. That being so, it would be the defendant's duty under Section 57 to disclose any defect in the property likely to be dangerous to the licensee of which the defendant … was not this room which fell and injured Umersey, but a different portion of the building consisting of privies and wash-houses where Umersey happened to

The Trustees of Port of Bombay Vs. the Premier Automobiles Ltd. and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 61A and 87; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Indian Contract Act - Sections 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : AIR1974SC923; (1974)4SCC710; [1974]3SCR397

area must claim the nation's immediate attention towards basic reformation of the traditional structure and procedure if the Indian Judicature is to sustain the litigative credibility of the community. Indeed, even about British Justice Lord Devlin's observations … it is not enough that the State install police stations inside the ports; it must ensure diligent action by the officials, and if there is … General. Sri Cooper contested the application of the principle in Bootamal on the score that Article 31, Limitation Act, 1908, which fell for construction there, used the words 'when the goods ought to be delivered' and covers both … is instituted' : Balo v. Koklan (1930) L.R. 57 l.A. 325. Counsel for the appellants admitted that … is only a short point of law in the case, a large section of the business community, as well as the Port Trust, are affected

The Nair Service Society Vs. Krishna Pillai Kunjukrishna Pillai and or ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Articles 113, 115 and 120

Reported in : AIR1964Ker265

and should run from the date of the beginning of the construction.12. Three articles of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, were discussed at the bar : Articles 113, 115 and 120. Article 113 deals with suits 'for specific … of interest is: Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank of Jamestown, 57 A. L. R. 980, a decision of the Court of Appeals of … A promises B to make him a gin, consideration may be lacking, though B has renounced other of port unities for betterment in the faith that the promise will be kept. The half-truths of one generation tend … can be found in what is styled a 'promissory estoppel'. Williston, Contracts, Sections 139, 116. Whether the exception has made its way in this State