Advanced Search Results

Villianur Iyarkkai Padukappu Maiyam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilCommercial

Acts : Major Ports Trust Act; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 18, 46 and 50; Business of the Government of Pondicherry Rules, 1963 - Rule 5 and 5(2); Indian Major Ports Act, 1908; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(9); Pondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962 - Sections 5; Pondicherry Administration Regulations Act, 1963 - Sections 3; Pondicherry (Laws) Regulation, 1963 - Regulations 2 and 6; Pondicherry (Alteration of name) Act, 2006 - Sections 4; Environment Protection Act; General Financial Rules, 1963; Supreme Court Orders, 1960 - Order 16; Supreme Court Rules, 1960 - Rule 4(1); Delegation of Financial Rules - Rule 21; Constitution of India - Articles 162, 239, 239A and 240

Reported in : JT2009(8)SC339; (2009)7SCC561; 2009(8)LC3627(SC); [2009] 9 SCR 225

minor ports can be undertaken by the respective State Government after formulating its own guidelines and modalities. The Indian Ports Act, 1908 permits the State Government to develop the minor ports. By virtue of power vested in the Parliament by … is created under Article 239A to function as a Legislature for the Union Territory of Puducherry [substituted by Section 4 of the Pondicherry (Alteration of name) Act, 2006 for Pondicherry], the President shall not make any regulation for

Smt. Dhan Mal Devi JaIn Vs. Gordhan Dass and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1)

Reported in : JT1987(1)SC623; 1987Supp(1)SCC632

to be undertaken while developing a port cannot be stopped by merely naming them as real estate business. INDIAN PORTS ACT, 1908 Sections 4(1), 6(1) & 3(9) & (8): Minor ports - Jurisdiction to undertake development and privatization of Pondicherry … Ors. (1976) Supp.SCR 645 taking a view upon the construction of the definition of the term 'tenant' under Section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 as including a statutory tenant and also holding that

Sampath Kumar Vs. Ayyakannu and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR2002SC3369; 2002(6)ALD63(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)866; 2003(1)AWC18(SC); 2002(51)BLJR93; [2003(1)JCR283(SC)]; JT2002(7)SC182; (2002)3MLJ160(SC); RLW2003(1)SC49; 2002(6)SCALE; (2002) 7 SCC 559

to be undertaken while developing a port cannot be stopped by merely naming them as real estate business. INDIAN PORTS ACT, 1908 Sections 4(1), 6(1) & 3(9) & (8): Minor ports - Jurisdiction to undertake development and privatization of Pondicherry … had acted arbitrarily or that the letter of intent was issued to favour Respondent 11 with oblique motives. Section 11:Res judicata Concession made before High Court Effect - Government of Pondicherry selecting S as developer for development

Haryana Urban Development Authority Vs. Raj Rani

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConsumerProperty

Reported in : IV(2004)CPJ27(SC); 2004(8)SCALE214; (2005)9SCC536

to be undertaken while developing a port cannot be stopped by merely naming them as real estate business. INDIAN PORTS ACT, 1908 Sections 4(1), 6(1) & 3(9) & (8): Minor ports - Jurisdiction to undertake development and privatization of Pondicherry … had acted arbitrarily or that the letter of intent was issued to favour Respondent 11 with oblique motives. Section 11:Res judicata Concession made before High Court Effect - Government of Pondicherry selecting S as developer for development

Debaraj Padhi and ors. Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : JT1995(9)SC521; (1996)ILLJ11SC; 1995(5)SCALE290; (1995)6SCC41; 1995(2)LC625(SC)

to be undertaken while developing a port cannot be stopped by merely naming them as real estate business. INDIAN PORTS ACT, 1908 Sections 4(1), 6(1) & 3(9) & (8): Minor ports - Jurisdiction to undertake development and privatization of Pondicherry … had acted arbitrarily or that the letter of intent was issued to favour Respondent 11 with oblique motives. Section 11:Res judicata Concession made before High Court Effect - Government of Pondicherry selecting S as developer for development

Haryana Tourism Corporation Ltd. Vs. Fakir Chand, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR2003SC4465; JT2003(Suppl2)SC424; (2004)ILLJ195SC; 2003(8)SCALE582; (2003)8SCC248; (2004)1UPLBEC160

to be undertaken while developing a port cannot be stopped by merely naming them as real estate business. INDIAN PORTS ACT, 1908 Sections 4(1), 6(1) & 3(9) & (8): Minor ports - Jurisdiction to undertake development and privatization of Pondicherry … had acted arbitrarily or that the letter of intent was issued to favour Respondent 11 with oblique motives. Section 11:Res judicata Concession made before High Court Effect - Government of Pondicherry selecting S as developer for development

Harish Sehgal Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145, 146 and 482

Reported in : 2000(8)SCALE381

to be undertaken while developing a port cannot be stopped by merely naming them as real estate business. INDIAN PORTS ACT, 1908 Sections 4(1), 6(1) & 3(9) & (8): Minor ports - Jurisdiction to undertake development and privatization of Pondicherry … 1) and Ms. Lata Gupta (referred to as Party No. 2). The local police intervened and proceedings under Section 145 Cr. PC were initiated before the City Magistrate, Dehradun. The property was attached under Section 146 Cr.

Konda Venugopala Raju Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1997SC3126; 1997(5)ALT4(SC); JT1997(6)SC594; 1997(5)SCALE38; (1997)6SCC277; [1997]Supp1SCR638

to be undertaken while developing a port cannot be stopped by merely naming them as real estate business. INDIAN PORTS ACT, 1908 Sections 4(1), 6(1) & 3(9) & (8): Minor ports - Jurisdiction to undertake development and privatization of Pondicherry … 1993. Resultantly, notice in Form VI was issued to the petitioner to surrender the said excess and under Section 10 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling of Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1972 (for short, the 'Act'). The

illahi ShamsuddIn Nadaf Vs. Sou. Jaitunbi Makbul Nadaf

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Reported in : 1994(3)ALT48(SC); (1995)97BOMLR937; JT1994(4)SC371; 1994(3)SCALE254; (1994)5SCC476; [1994]Supp1SCR597

to be undertaken while developing a port cannot be stopped by merely naming them as real estate business. INDIAN PORTS ACT, 1908 Sections 4(1), 6(1) & 3(9) & (8): Minor ports - Jurisdiction to undertake development and privatization of Pondicherry … had acted arbitrarily or that the letter of intent was issued to favour Respondent 11 with oblique motives. Section 11:Res judicata Concession made before High Court Effect - Government of Pondicherry selecting S as developer for development

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Atlas Copco (India) Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 - Sections 16(1) and 18(2)

Reported in : [1993]202ITR254(SC)

to be undertaken while developing a port cannot be stopped by merely naming them as real estate business. INDIAN PORTS ACT, 1908 Sections 4(1), 6(1) & 3(9) & (8): Minor ports - Jurisdiction to undertake development and privatization of Pondicherry … judgment of the Bombay High ' Court dismissing an application filed by the Revenue under Sub-section (2) of Section 18 of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. The question raised by the Revenue reads as follows :Whether,