Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian ports act 1908 section 15 · Page 1 of about 348 results (0.096 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 21 1966

Trustees of the Port of Madras Vs. Mettur Chemical and Industries Ltd. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-21-1966

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 110; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 15(2) and 29(2)

Reported in : AIR1967Mad102

The plaintiffs seek to get over this bar pleaded by relying on Section 15(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, which enables plaintiffs to exclude the period of any notice which has to be given in accordance with … 1. This revision has been preferred by the Trustees of the Port of Madras, defendants in a suit for the recovery of damages for short delivery of goods. It is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1950

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-14-1950

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Sections 1 and 15(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(4); Madras Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

3, Clause (k); Rubber Production and Marketing Act (XXIV [24] of 1947), Section 3 (1), Clause (v); the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (xv [15] of 1908), Section 3, Clause (8) ; Madras Act XIV [14] of 1947 Section 2, Clause

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1920

Lakshman Gowroji Nakhwa Vs. Ramji Antone Nakhwa

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-12-1920

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1921Bom93; (1921)23BOMLR939

provisions as to removing obstructions and paying compensation will be found in Sections 10 and 12 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, which was amended by Act VI of 1916, but I do not think I need pursue that.64. Then … to the earth.'57. He next relies on the definition of easement in the Indian Limitation Act IX of 1908. Section 2(5) says: -Easement' includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove … He relies in the first place on Sections 15 and 4 of the Indian Easements Act, viz., in Section 15 the words-Where...any other easement has been peaceably and openly enjoyed by any person claiming title thereto, as an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 02 1999

Mr. Kamla Kant Dube and Another Vs. M.V. Umang and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-02-1999

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9-A, 20 and 120; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 214, 215, 225, 226 and 372; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 49 and 52; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 28, 30 and 37; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1 and 2; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891; Sea Act, 1925; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(15); Admiralty Court Act, 1861 - Sections 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2)

Reported in : AIR2000Bom211; 2000(2)ALLMR48; 2000(2)BomCR556

the Bombay Land Revenue Code along with English translation of relevant extract, marked Annexure C, the notification extending Indian Ports Act, 1908 to the Port of Kandla with effect from April 1, 1950 marked Annexure 'D' and the certificate by … claim as and by way of damages for the estate of the deceased is under the provisions of section 2 (proviso) of the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 and compensation for the loss of dependency under provisions of … the 1st defendant vessel at Kandla Port on or about 27-5-1996. On 15-8-1996 when the 1st defendant vessel was lying at the port of Kandla,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1984

Pratap V. Soni Vs. Gandhidham Development Authority and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-16-1984

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Gandhidham (Development and Control on Erection of Buildings) Act, 1958 - Sections 12(l); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1985Guj68

the limits of the major port of Kandla defined or altered, as the case may be, under the Indian Ports Act 1908 (XV of 1908) being an area owned or occupied for the purposes of that port by the Central … addition and alteration in the said house without the permission of the authority in writing as required by section 7 of the Gandhidham Act., the same was required to be demolished. Details of unauthorised construction, addition and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2013

M/S. United India Insurance Company Ltd. and Another Vs. Kishore L. To ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Jul-05-2013

Subject : Miscellaneous

within the port area and that there was navigational hazard. It is submitted that Chapter III of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (the Act, for short) deals with the appointment of the Conservator and his powers. He submitted that in … Rs. 1,30,000/- and therefore the cross-objection is also liable to be dismissed. 15. Mr. Bhobe, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the defendant no. … for short) deals with the appointment of the Conservator and his powers. He submitted that in terms of Section 10 of the said Act the Conservator can cause obstruction to be removed within the limits of port

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1998

Seaways Shipping Ltd. Having Its Office at Ii Floor, Rahmat Manzil, 51 ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-13-1998

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 14,19(1)and 226; Major Port Trust Act, 1963 -- Sections 28, 34(1), 42(1), 42(3), 111 and 133; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 -- Sections 123; Indian Ports Act, 1908

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC318

learned Senior Counsel points out that Section 133 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 has repealed the Indian Ports Act, 1908 as also the Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 and, therefore, the regulations thereunder must be deemed to have … generation through the Port and should generate their own cargo for achieving the minimum guaranteed throughput.(xi) Under Clause 15, the agreement provides that any other vessel operated by the licensee which is not listed in the nominated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 1977

Board of Trustees of the Visakhapatnam Port Trust Vs. Commercial Tax O ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-17-1977

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1979]43STC36(AP)

enactments of the Parliament which have a bearing on the question at issue before us. One is the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (Act 15 of 1908), and the other is the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 (Act 38 of 1963). … cases is whether the Board of Trustees can be said to be a dealer within the meaning of Section 2(1)(e) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The sales

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1966

The Trustees of the Port of Madras Vs. Mettur Chemical and Industries ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-21-1966

Subject : CivilLimitation

Reported in : (1968)1MLJ162

The plaintiffs seek to get over this bar pleaded by relying on Section 15(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, which enables plaintiffs to exclude the period of any notice which has to be given in accordance with … M. Natesan, J.1. This revision has been preferred by the Trustees of the Port of Madras, defendants in a suit for the recovery of damages for short delivery of goods. It is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2014

M/S. Shreeji Shipping Vs. C.C.E. and S.T. Rajkot

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Apr-09-2014

Subject : Service Tax

we are concerned in this case is being rendered in a minor port to which the provisions of Indian Ports Act, 1908 and Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 are applicable is also a distinction which is untenable as grant of … which has come in the section incorporated as an exception or proviso." 15. The suggestion of the Counsel for the Revenue that the reasoning laid … services and are liable to pay the differential service tax and demanded interest; imposed equivalent penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. 3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant after taking us through

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial