Advanced Search Results

State Vs. Banchhanidhi Mehar

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 - Sections 45, 46 and 47; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 408; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 26

Reported in : AIR1957Ori165; 1957CriLJ899

Sessions Judge, Sambalpur. The Respondent was convicted by the Munsif-Magistrate, 1st class. Bargarh under Section 408 of the Indian Penal Code find was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- … requires a sanction for prosecution for an offence under the Act. Offences under the Act are contained in sections 45 and 46 in Chapter VII relating to 'Penalties and Procedure'. Section 45 commences by saying that 'it

State of Karnataka by Gandasi Police Vs. Rangappa S/O Ningegowda

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 408 and 409; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428

Reported in : 2007(5)KarLJ599; ILR2007(3)Kar2878; 2007(3)KCCR1830; 2007(4)AIRKarR598; 2007(5)KLJ598

the accused and remand him for serving out the sentence. Criminal - Misappropriation - Section 408 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Accused, employee of Bank, on giving a cheque for encashment, misappropriated money after en-cashing the same … Arasikere in C.C. NO. 1159/97 dated 4.5.2002 wherein the respondent has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 408 IPC.2. The essential facts of the case leading upto this appeal with reference to the rank of

State of Punjab Vs. Kesari Chand and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Punjab Co-operative Societies Act, 1961; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468(2)

Reported in : AIR1987P& H216

thus on 25-9-1970 sent a letter to the Superintendent of Police, Bhatinda, whereupon a case under S. 408, Indian Penal Code, was registered and after investigation the two respondents Kesri Chand, the Secretary of the Society, and Surrinder Singh, … area concerned on January 29, 1987.Kulwant Singh Tiwana, J.21. I agree.S.S. Dewan, J.22. I agree.23. Appeal allowed - Sections 100-A [As inserted by Act 22 of 2002], 110 & 104 & Letters Patent, 1865, Clause 10: [Dr.

State of Maharashtra Vs. Bhuvanendra Mallapa Akiwate

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 1996(3)BomCR590; 1997CriLJ177

impugned judgment. 10. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. 11. Appeal dismissed. Criminal - acquittal - Section 408 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - respondent charged under section 408 - pleaded not guilty - tried - prosecution tendered documentary evidence … 24-1-1986 passed by the JMFC, Vadgaon, District Kolhapur, in Regular Criminal Case No. 58/1984 acquitting the respondent under Section 408, I.P.C. has come up in appeal before us. 2. Briefly stated the prosecution case is as under

Pramod Son of Laxmikant Sisamkar and Uday Narayanrao Kirpekar Vs. Garw ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408 and 420

Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR411

allegations in the complaints which are common for the alleged offences under sections 408 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code do not disclose that the petitioners have committed any offences under the said sections. Particularly, the submission on

State of Karnataka Vs. Marigouda

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCriminal

Acts : Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 109 and 111; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4439

is not required for the prosecution of the accused for the offences punishable under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code.5. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondent/ accused submits that from the alleged facts it is … is required to prosecute the accused for the offence punishable under Section 408 IPC in view of the conflicting decisions of the two Division Benches … above decisions has held that sanction under Section 111 is required for the prosecution of the accused under Sections 406 and 409 IPC. In our considered view, the decision rendered in PUNDALIK ANNAPPA GARAGE's case (supra) is

Raghunath Dhondu Vani Vs. Ilahi Babulal Mujavar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code. - Section 408, 420

133 of 1991, thereby acquitting the respondent no.1 (original accused) for the offence punishable under Section 408 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The appellant no.1 and respondent no.1 are referred to as per their original status i.e. complainant and … Criminal Case No. 133 of 1991, thereby acquitting the respondent no.1 (original accused) for the offence punishable under Section 408 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The appellant no.1 and respondent no.1 are referred to as per their

State of Kerala Vs. Putthumana Illath Jathavedan Namboodiri

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408, 468 and 477A;

Reported in : AIR1999SC981; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)372; 1999CriLJ1443; 1999(1)Crimes62(SC); JT1999(1)SC456; 1999(1)KLT735(SC); 1999(1)SCALE418; (1999)2SCC452; [1999]1SCR575

and sentence passed against the accused respondent of the offences under Sections 408, 468 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code.2. The accused-respondent was an employee of Western India Plywoods and was head of the purchase section. In course

Harish Chandra Singh Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408

Reported in : 1995(I)OLR46

arises out of an appellate Judgment confirming the conviction of the petitioner for the offence under Section 408. IPC. In the trial Court, petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs.1,000/-, … arises out of an appellate Judgment confirming the conviction of the petitioner for the offence under Section 408. IPC. In the trial Court, petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs.1,000/-, … & SERVICES Pay Scale:[Tarun Chatterjee & R.M. Lodha,JJ] Fixation - Orissa Service Code (1939), Rule 74(b) Promotion - Government servant, by virtue of Rule 74(b), … appellate Judgment confirming the conviction of the petitioner for the offence under Section 408. IPC. In the trial Court, petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous

Barjure Kaikhosroo Maarfatia Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), - Sections 408, 467, 468, 471 and 477A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , - Sections 342

Reported in : AIR1978SC434; 1978CriLJ507; (1978)1SCC596; [1978]2SCR479

convicting the appellant-accused for offences under Section 471 read with Section 467, Sections 408 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to one day's imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000/-and in default to suffer rigorous