Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian penal code ipc sections 452 394 · Page 1 of about 582 results (0.067 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 14 1995

Ramcharan Bhudiram Gupta Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-14-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 392, 394, 397, 411 and 452

Reported in : 1996(1)BomCR190; 1995CriLJ4048

they have rendered us. Appeals partly allowed. Criminal - robbery - Sections 392, 394, 411 and 452 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal against conviction under Sections 392, 394 and 452 - appellants alleged to have committed robbery … convicted and sentenced in the manner stated hereinafter :- Appellant Ramcharan Budhiram Gupta : i) Under Section 394, IPC to 6 years rigorous imprisonment; ii) Under Section 392, IPC read with 34, IPC to 6 years rigorous

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2006

Raj Kappor @ Raj Dahiya Vs. State of Delhi Through (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-21-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1969 - Sections 27; Arms Act, 1983; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 279, 302, 307, 316, 337, 394 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164 and 251

Reported in : 2007(94)DRJ218

of RC No. 2(S)/97-SIU-I under Section 120-B read with Sections 302, 307, 394, 452 and 316 of the Indian Penal Code whereby the learned Special Judge has held the appellants, Raj Kapoor @ Raj Dahiya, Sanjay Singh and Anindo … having committed offence punishable under Section 120-B read with Sections 302, 307, 394, 452 and 316 of the IPC is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 20,000/- or in default

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 28 2010

Farhad Alam Balli Shahalam Rajput Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-28-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 394, 323, 324, 294A, 452, 427, 506(1), 114.; Bombay Police Act - Section 135(1)

Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 323, 324, 294A, 452, 427, 506(1), 114 etc. of the Indian Penal Code and section 135(1) of the Bombay Police Act.3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that considering the … Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 323, 324, 294A, 452, 427, 506(1), 114 etc. of the Indian Penal Code and section 135(1) of the Bombay Police Act.3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 21 2006

Raj Kapoor @ Raj Dahiya and ors. Vs. State of Delhi Through (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-21-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1969 - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164 and 251; Indian Arms Act of 1983 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 279, 302, 307, 316, 337, 394 and 452

Reported in : 2006(91)DRJ707

of RC No. 2(S)/97-SIU-I under Section 120-B read with Sections 302, 307, 394, 452 and 316 of the Indian Penal Code whereby the learned Special Judge has held the appellants, Raj Kapoor @ Raj Dahiya, Sanjay Singh and Anindo … having committed offence punishable under Section 120-B read with Sections 302, 307, 394, 452 and 316 of the IPC is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- or in default simple

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2011

Dudhnath at Ajay Baburam Harijan. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-18-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 394, 450 and 342 rw 34, 352, 392 rw 34, 120B, 390, 394

Harijan were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 450 and 342 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight years and to pay fine of Rs.2000/- on first … punishable under Sections 394, 450 and 342 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight years … the basis of the report lodged by her, Crime No.310 of 2006 was registered for the offence under Sections 452, 342 and 392 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. During the investigation, both the accused persons

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2016

N. Kannan and Another Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Tiruvarur ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-04-2016

Subject : Criminal

conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants by the trial Court are hereby confirmed. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 120-B, Section 394, Section 394 read with Section 109, Section 449, Section 341, Section 392, … returning to the Police Station, he registered a case in Crime No.1233 of 2013 for the offences under Sections 452, 342, 307 and 302 IPC against both the accused. Ex.P-10 is the F.I.R. He forwarded Ex.P-10 to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2005

Vinay Kumar Vs. the Commissioner of Police

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-05-2005

Subject : ServiceCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 324, 394 and 452

Reported in : 120(2005)DLT182; 2005(82)DRJ221

submitted an application mentioning therein that he was involved in a case FIR No. 503/98 under Sections 452/394/324/34 IPC, Police Station Gokul Puri, Delhi, which he could not mention in the Attestation Form. It was also stated … submitted an application mentioning therein that he was involved in a case FIR No. 503/98 under Sections 452/394/324/34 IPC, Police Station Gokul Puri, Delhi, which he could not mention in the Attestation Form. It was also stated … Committee examined all the 23 cases of concealment of facts and their criminal involvements keeping in view the various instructions issued by the Police Headquarter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2006

Sumlo @ Sumla Himla Bhuriya and 2 ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat and an ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-05-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Police Act - Sections 135; Arms Act - Sections 25(1); Gold (Control) Act - Sections 8; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 307, 323, 342, 394, 395, 397 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 122, 427, 427(1) and 427(2); Customs Act

Reported in : 2007CriLJ612; (2007)3GLR2734

before the Satellite Police Station, bearing C.R.No.I-455/96 for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 397 and 307 of I.P.C. and another is before the Bapunagar … the facts are that the applicants, three in number, are convicted for offence under Section 395 of the IPC and they are sentenced to undergo 4 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500/-, in default 3 … the facts are that the applicants, three in number, are convicted for offence under Section 395 of the IPC and they are sentenced to undergo 4 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500/-, in default 3 … 43/2000. and applicants are entitled under Section 427 of the Criminal Procedure Code and therefore, it is required to be ordered to run concurrently of … imprisonment for 1 year. For offences under Section 452 read with Section 34 the applicants were awarded

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2011

imran Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 394, 452, 341, 392, 397, 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Sections 482, 313, 315, 427

of appellant by the complainant in court is acceptable and is not hit by Section 9 of the Indian Evidence Act. Identity of the accused is a relevant fact as per the said Section and the testimony … No3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes1. Appellant has been convicted under Sections 394/452/341 IPC by the Trial Court; sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of `10,000/- and in … years. Appellant is involved in only two cases. He has no other criminal record. Appellant is a young man. He has to support his old

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2003

Vijay Uttamlal Chaudhary Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-20-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 392, 394, 397 and 452

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)109; 2004(1)BomCR154; 2004CriLJ1846

applicant has been convicted for an offence punishable under the provisions of Section 452 read with 34 of IPC, 392 read with 34 of IPC, 394 read with 34 of IPC and Section 392 read with Section … applicant has been convicted for an offence punishable under the provisions of Section 452 read with 34 of IPC, 392 read with 34 of IPC, 394 read with 34 of IPC and Section 392 read with Section … offence punishable under the provisions of Section 452 read with 34 of IPC, 392 read with 34 of IPC, 394 read with 34 of IPC … applicant has been convicted for an offence punishable under the provisions of Section 452 read with 34 of IPC, 392 read with 34 of IPC,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial