Advanced Search Results
State of Karnataka by Gandasi Police Vs. Rangappa S/O Ningegowda
Karnataka
Apr-17-2007
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 408 and 409; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428
2007(5)KarLJ599; ILR2007(3)Kar2878; 2007(3)KCCR1830; 2007(4)AIRKarR598; 2007(5)KLJ598
the accused and remand him for serving out the sentence. Criminal - Misappropriation - Section 408 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Accused, employee of Bank, on giving a cheque for encashment, misappropriated money after en-cashing the same … C.C. NO. 1159/97 dated 4.5.2002 wherein the respondent has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 408 IPC.2. The essential facts of the case leading upto this appeal with reference to the rank of the parties … 4.5.2002 wherein the respondent has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 408 IPC.2. The essential facts of the case leading upto this appeal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Punjab Vs. Kesari Chand and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-13-1987
Criminal
Punjab Co-operative Societies Act, 1961; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468(2)
AIR1987P& H216
thus on 25-9-1970 sent a letter to the Superintendent of Police, Bhatinda, whereupon a case under S. 408, Indian Penal Code, was registered and after investigation the two respondents Kesri Chand, the Secretary of the Society, and Surrinder Singh, … thus on 25-9-1970 sent a letter to the Superintendent of Police, Bhatinda, whereupon a case under S. 408, Indian Penal Code, was registered and after investigation the two respondents Kesri Chand, the Secretary of the Society, and … Singh Tiwana, J.21. I agree.S.S. Dewan, J.22. I agree.23. Appeal allowed - Sections 100-A [As inserted by Act 22 of 2002], 110 & 104 &
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Bhuvanendra Mallapa Akiwate
Mumbai
Mar-11-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313
1996(3)BomCR590; 1997CriLJ177
impugned judgment. 10. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. 11. Appeal dismissed. Criminal - acquittal - Section 408 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - respondent charged under section 408 - pleaded not guilty - tried - prosecution tendered documentary evidence … submitted against the respondent under Section 408, I.P.C. 4. In the trial Court a charge under Section 408, IPC was framed against the respondent to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The respondent … District Kolhapur, in Regular Criminal Case No. 58/1984 acquitting the respondent under Section 408, I.P.C. has come up in appeal before us. 2. Briefly stated
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pramod Son of Laxmikant Sisamkar and Uday Narayanrao Kirpekar Vs. Garw ...
Mumbai
Aug-29-1986
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408 and 420
1986(3)BomCR411
allegations in the complaints which are common for the alleged offences under sections 408 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code do not disclose that the petitioners have committed any offences under the said sections. Particularly, the submission on … training during their service in the company is a 'property' or not within the meaning of section 405 IPC, because according to me the instant writ petitions should succeed upon the other requirements of sections 408 and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Karnataka Vs. Marigouda
Karnataka
Aug-25-2004
Trusts and SocietiesCriminal
Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 109 and 111; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408
ILR2004KAR4439
is not required for the prosecution of the accused for the offences punishable under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code.5. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondent/ accused submits that from the alleged facts it is … ( for short, the 'Act') is required to prosecute the accused for the offence punishable under Section 408 IPC in view of the conflicting decisions of the two Division Benches of this Court in STATE BY PSI … under Section 111 is required for the prosecution of the accused under Sections 406 and 409 IPC. In our considered view, the decision rendered in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaghunath Dhondu Vani Vs. Ilahi Babulal Mujavar
Mumbai
Nov-15-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code. - Section 408, 420
133 of 1991, thereby acquitting the respondent no.1 (original accused) for the offence punishable under Section 408 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The appellant no.1 and respondent no.1 are referred to as per their original status i.e. complainant and … 133 of 1991, thereby acquitting the respondent no.1 (original accused) for the offence punishable under Section 408 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The appellant no.1 and respondent no.1 are referred to as per their original status i.e. … thereby acquitting the respondent no.1 (original accused) for the offence punishable under Section 408 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The appellant no.1 and respondent no.1
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala Vs. Putthumana Illath Jathavedan Namboodiri
Supreme Court of India
Feb-11-1999
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408, 468 and 477A;
AIR1999SC981; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)372; 1999CriLJ1443; 1999(1)Crimes62(SC); JT1999(1)SC456; 1999(1)KLT735(SC); 1999(1)SCALE418; (1999)2SCC452; [1999]1SCR575
and sentence passed against the accused respondent of the offences under Sections 408, 468 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code.2. The accused-respondent was an employee of Western India Plywoods and was head of the purchase section. In course … and sentence passed against the accused respondent of the offences under Sections 408, 468 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code.2. The accused-respondent was an employee of Western India Plywoods and was head of the purchase section.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarish Chandra Singh Vs. State of Orissa
Orissa
May-10-1994
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408
1995(I)OLR46
arises out of an appellate Judgment confirming the conviction of the petitioner for the offence under Section 408. IPC. In the trial Court, petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs.1,000/-, … arises out of an appellate Judgment confirming the conviction of the petitioner for the offence under Section 408. IPC. In the trial Court, petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs.1,000/-, … appellate Judgment confirming the conviction of the petitioner for the offence under Section 408. IPC. In the trial Court, petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous … & SERVICES Pay Scale:[Tarun Chatterjee & R.M. Lodha,JJ] Fixation - Orissa Service Code (1939), Rule 74(b) Promotion - Government servant, by virtue of Rule 74(b),
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBarjure Kaikhosroo Maarfatia Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Dec-16-1977
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), - Sections 408, 467, 468, 471 and 477A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , - Sections 342
AIR1978SC434; 1978CriLJ507; (1978)1SCC596; [1978]2SCR479
convicting the appellant-accused for offences under Section 471 read with Section 467, Sections 408 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to one day's imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000/-and in default to suffer rigorous … convicting the appellant-accused for offences under Section 471 read with Section 467, Sections 408 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to one day's imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000/-and in default to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKantilal Gandalal Shah Vs. the State of Gujarat
Supreme Court of India
Nov-15-1973
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 408
AIR1974SC222; 1974CriLJ310; (1974)3SCC587
trust with respect to the said property and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 408 of the Indian Penal Code and within my cognizance.' The High Court has found that the appellant had credited the sum of Rupees … trust with respect to the said property and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 408 of the Indian Penal Code and within my cognizance.' The High Court has found that the appellant had credited the sum … appellant was convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dhrangadhra under Section 408 of the Penal Code and was sentenced to imprisonment till the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »