Advanced Search Results

Khan Singh @ Ujagar Khan and Chhotey Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 396, 411 and 412; Arms Act - Sections 25; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2305

412 IPC.15. Now the crucial question is as to what extent the presumption under Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act from the said recovery could help prove the charge under Section 396 IPC or 412 IPC. … S.T. No. 370 of 1984, whereby he convicted all the three accused-appellants of the offence under Section 396 IPC and sentenced (hem to undergo imprisonment for life and further convicted Chhotey accused-appellant and Khan Singh alias Ujagar … 1984, whereby he convicted all the three accused-appellants of the offence under Section 396 IPC and sentenced (hem to undergo imprisonment for life and further … In the case of Sheonath Bhar v. State of U.P. 1990 Allahabad Criminal Rulings 553 : 1990 Cri LJ 2423 it was held that a

GulamuddIn Vs. State (Gnct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 396; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2007(97)DRJ589

Hindu Rao Police Station whereby all the five appellants were convicted under Section 396 read with Section 34 IPC and also under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.2. The appellants/accused were prosecuted for having committed dacoity … Hindu Rao Police Station whereby all the five appellants were convicted under Section 396 read with Section 34 IPC and also under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.2. The appellants/accused were prosecuted for having committed dacoity … committed to the Sessions Court. The learned Trial Judge framed charges under Sections 396/302/34 IPC against all the five accused persons and all of them … awarded to them deserve to be affirmed.22. In the result, we dismiss Criminal Appeal No. 768/06 filed by appellant Gulamuddin, Criminal Appeal No. 785/06 filed

Laliya and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 396

Reported in : AIR1967Raj134

judgment of the Sessions Judge. Alwar dated 27-11-1965, convicting the first three, appellants for offence under Section 396, Indian Penal Code, and sentencing them to ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200; in default, one year's … judgment of the Sessions Judge. Alwar dated 27-11-1965, convicting the first three, appellants for offence under Section 396, Indian Penal Code, and sentencing them to ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200; in default, … Judge. Alwar dated 27-11-1965, convicting the first three, appellants for offence under Section 396, Indian Penal Code, and sentencing them to ten years' rigorous imprisonment

Raghubir Chamar @ Ahir and Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 396; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

1. Raghubir Chamar @ Ahir and 2. Ram Naresh Yadav @ Naresh Ahir under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life.2. The prosecution case as per the statement given by … 1. Raghubir Chamar @ Ahir and 2. Ram Naresh Yadav @ Naresh Ahir under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life.2. The prosecution case as per the statement … Chamar @ Ahir and 2. Ram Naresh Yadav @ Naresh Ahir under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo rigorous

State of Bihar Vs. Anirudh Thakur and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 396; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1998IAD(SC)581; AIR1998SC921; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)394; 1998(1)ALT(Cri)260; 1998(1)BLJR527; 1998CriLJ1201; 1998(1)Crimes174(SC); JT1998(1)SC505; 1998(1)SCALE419; (1998)9SCC616

ordered to surrender to custody to serve out the remaining sentence. Criminal - dacoity - Section 396 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal against acquittal for offence under Section 396 - evidence receive support from extra judicial confession … The five respondents, along with one Bharat Singh, were tried for committing the offence punishable under Section 396 IPC, in the court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi in Sessions Trial No. 53 of 1979/11 of 1990. … with one Bharat Singh, were tried for committing the offence punishable under Section 396 IPC, in the court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi in

State of U.P. Vs. Sadhu Saran Shukla

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Section 396;Uttar Pradesh Prisoners' Release on Probation Act, 1938 - Sections 2, 9

Reported in : (1994)2SCC445

shall not be released under the Act :(a) Those convicted of offences under the following provisions of the Indian Penal Code:Chapters V-A, VI and VIISections 216-A, 224 and 225 (if it is a case of escape from a … In this appeal by the State of U.P. the respondent was convicted for an offence under Section 396 IPC. He, however, invoked Section 2 of the Uttar Pradesh Prisoners' Release on Probation Act, 1938 seeking release from … 459, 460, 489-A and Section 511 read with any of the aforesaid sections;”It can be seen that Rule 3(a) in effect precludes the Government from

Pancho Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 396, 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 366, 313

Reported in : 2011(10)SCC165; 2011(4)KLT110(C.No.121)(SN); 2012(1)SCC(Cri)223; AIR2012SCW452; 2012CriLJ832; AIR2012SC523

and A2-Pancho are on bail. Their bail bonds stand discharged.19. Appeals are disposed of in the aforestated terms. Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 396 - Dacoity with murder -- Accused-Shishu and A1-Pratham were standing outside. As desired by A1-Pratham, he was … by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad in Sessions Case No.40 of 11.12.2002 / 30.11.1999 for offence punishable under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, “the IPC”). According to the prosecution, two more persons were

Amar Nath Mallah Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 396

Sessions Trial No. 427/94.2. The sole appellant, Amar Nath Mallah, has been convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment.3. Briefly, the facts of the case are that on 19th October, 1993, the … Sessions Trial No. 427/94.2. The sole appellant, Amar Nath Mallah, has been convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment.3. Briefly, the facts of the case are that on 19th October, … No. 427/94.2. The sole appellant, Amar Nath Mallah, has been convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment.3. Briefly,

AmIn Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3 and 35; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 396; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378, 378(3), 379, 390, 396, 411A, 417(2), 427 and 482

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1012; 2009CriLJ2266; 2009(3)SCALE391; (2009)3SCC776; 2009(2)LC1008(SC); [2009] 3 SCR 348

Court, Jaipur Bench. Six persons faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and Sections 3 and 35 of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short the

Sanatan Rana Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 396, 397, 398 and 412

Reported in : AIR2005SC3532; 2005(3)BLJR2257; 2005CriLJ4162; 2005(5)CTC504; JT2005(8)SC391; (2005)12SCC596

Accordingly, it is dismissed. Criminal - Dacoity - Identification parade - Sections 396, 397, 398 and 412 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Dacoity took place in house of informant and in course of dacoity husband of informant and … terms.10. Lastly, counsel for the appellant raised a legal question that an offence under Section 396 of the IPC was not at all established against the appellant as in the instant case the murder had taken place