Advanced Search Results

Lohana Vasantlal Devchand and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 377

Reported in : AIR1968Guj252; 1968CriLJ1277; (1968)GLR1052; (1968)0GLR1053

Rajkot. The accused Nos. 1 and 3 were convicted of an offence, punishable under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and the accused No. 2, i.e., the petitioner No. 2 was convicted for attempting to commit that offence, … 3 were convicted of an offence, punishable under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and the accused No. 2, i.e., the petitioner No. 2 … the petitioners as amicus curiae.(15) The petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged.(16) Petition dismissed. Criminal - attempt - Sections 377 and 511 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - revision petition filed against conviction of two petitioners for offence

CalvIn Francis Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 377

Reported in : 74(1992)CLT585; 1992(I)OLR316

having committed coitus per se (sin of Gomorrah), was found guilty and convicted under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC), and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years by the … faced trial for allegedly having committed coitus per se (sin of Gomorrah), was found guilty and convicted under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC), and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a

Kartar Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 377

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2483; 1993(2)Crimes569; 49(1993)DLT458; 1993(25)DRJ246

counsel for the petitioner contended that actually no case under Sections 377 or 376 read with Section 511 Indian Penal Code was made out against the petitioner and at the most an offence under Section 354 Indian Penal Code … been filed for quashing charges against the petitioner under Sections 377 and 376 read with Section 511 of IPC.(2) The story of the prosecution is that on 11.10.91, Anuradha aged about 8 years studying in third standard

Jai Prakash @ Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 106 and 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 354 and 377; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 313 and 3227(2)

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1548; 2006(3)WLC544

Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Jhunjhunu whereby the appellant has been convicted for offences under Section 377 and 302 IPC. For the former offence, the appellant has been sentenced to 10 years R.I. and fined Rs. 500/- and … socially sensitized Judge is a better statutory armour in cases of crime against women than long clauses of penal provisions, containing complex exceptions and provisos. The same philosophy would equally apply to the case of child abuse.18. … the sub-section, would also apply in inquiry or trial of offences under sections 354 and 377 IPC.(2) In holding trial of child sex abuse or … murder of a eight year old boy forms the background of this criminal appeal. The appellant has challenged the judgment dated 31.7.2002 passed by the

Jamil Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Municipal Council Katangi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Section 377

Reported in : 1991Supp(1)SCC302

been condoned. Admittedly, in the present case the appellant has been convicted for an offence under Section 377 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 1/2 years and this was before he … been condoned. Admittedly, in the present case the appellant has been convicted for an offence under Section 377 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 1/2 years and this was before he … case the appellant has been convicted for an offence under Section 377 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 1/2 … the present case the appellant has been convicted for an offence under Section 377 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of

State of Kerala Vs. Kurissum Moottil Antony

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 377 and 451; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 357(1)

Reported in : JT2006(10)SC370; 2006(12)SCALE94; 2007AIRSCW1509; 2007(1)SCC627; (2007)1SCC(Cri)403; (2007)1Crimes22(SC).

filed by the respondent. Respondent was found guilty of offences punishable under Sections 451 and 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'). The Trial Court had convicted the respondent as aforesaid and had imposed sentence of

State Vs. Sunil Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 354, 376, 511, 377, 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC) - Section 313

Additional Sessions Judge whereby the Respondent Sunil Gupta was held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 354 Indian Penal Code (IPC) instead of the offence punishable under Section 376/511 IPC (for which he was charged) and was sentenced to … For the above reasons the appeal has to fail and is accordingly dismissed.  Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 354 - Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty -- By order dated 01.04.2011 this … the sentence of three months of rigorous imprisonment and fine. 11. Section 377 IPC entitles the State to file an appeal in a case of

Leo Francis Xaviour Vs. the Principal, Karunya Institute of Technology ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Secondary School Code - Rule 56.5; Education Act, 1944; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 377 and 504

Reported in : AIR1993Mad233

student of the Engineering college against the petitioner and two other students for an offence under Sections 377/504, Indian Penal Code. When that case was under investigation, the Dean of the students of the College, taking it to be … student of the Engineering college against the petitioner and two other students for an offence under Sections 377/504, Indian Penal Code. When that case was under investigation, the Dean of the students of the College, taking it

Naz Foundation Vs. Government of Nct and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Buggery Act, 1533; Sexual Offences Act, 1967; The Criminal Tribes Act, 1871; Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 30; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 292, 366, 377 to 376E and 497; Tasmanian Criminal Code - sections 122 and 123; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1997; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Constitution of India - Sections 10 - Articles 2, 2.2, 3, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(5), 16, 17, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 246(1) and 372

Reported in : 2010CriLJ94; 160(2009)DLT277

Governmental Organisation (NGO) as a Public Interest Litigation to challenge the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), which criminally penalizes what is described as 'unnatural offences', to the extent the said provision criminalises … 'carnal intercourse' is used in Section 377 IPC as distinct from the expression 'sexual intercourse', which appears in Sections 375 and 497 IPC. According to the Concise Oxford Dictionary (ninth edition, 1995), the term 'carnal' means 'of

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Hindurao Daulu Charapale

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307, 323, 324, 326 and 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 377(1) and 377(3)

Reported in : 1997BomCR(Cri)833; 1997CriLJ1649

an expedited basis. 23. Appeal allowed. Criminal - sentence - Sections 307, 323, 324, 326 and 504 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 377 (1) and 377 (3) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - appeal for enhancement of … and a fine of Rupees 1,000/-, in default 3 months' R.I. awarded to the Respondent under Section 326 IPC vide the judgment and order dated 21-4-1984 passed by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, in Session case No.