Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian penal code ipc sections 326 · Page 1 of about 12,250 results (0.170 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 30 2006

The State of Karnataka by Kakati Police Station Vs. Parashram Kallappa ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-30-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 320, 324, 325, 326, 397 and 398; Probation of Offenders Act; P.O. Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2007CriLJ479

court forthwith. Criminal - Acquittal - Grievous injury - Dangerous weapon - Section 320, 324, 325, 326 of Indian Penal Code - Section 5 of Probation of Offenders Act - Trial Court convicted respondents no. 1 and 2 under … or the injury that was caused was covered under the expression 'grievous hurt' as defined under Section 320 IPC. Sections 397 and 398). The facts involved in a particular case, depending upon various factors like sieze, sharpness, would

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2003

Deepak Kumar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 326, 394, 397, 448 and 450; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 374(2) and 386

Reported in : 2003(4)KarLJ277

however, convicts the accused/appellant for committing offences punishable under Sections 448 and 326 of the IPC and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for a period … accused 1, along with another charge-sheeted for committing offences punishable under Sections 450, 394 and 397 of the IPC read with Section 34 of the IPC.2. It is unfortunate to note that in the charge framed, without … accused 1, along with another charge-sheeted for committing offences punishable under Sections 450, 394 and 397 of the IPC read with Section 34 of the IPC.2. It is unfortunate to note that in the charge framed, without … and does not call for interference. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [C.A. No. 2/1974]. Section 173(8): [Subhash B. Adi,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2005

Mathai Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-12-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 320, 324, 325, 326 and 335; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 401

Reported in : AIR2005SC710; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)610; 2005CriLJ898; [2005(1)JCR213(SC)]; JT2005(2)SC365; 2005(1)KLT19(SC); (2005)3SCC260

the appellant (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') was guilty of offence punishable under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code (in short the 'IPC') and has been rightly convicted under such provision with corresponding sentence of two years … or the injury that was caused was covered under the expression 'grievous hurt' as defined under Section 320 IPC. Sections 397 and 398). The facts involved in a particular case, depending upon various factors like size, sharpness, would

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 16 1969

Ram Chander Rai and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-1969

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 326, 34, 149

Reported in : AIR1970SC2075; (1970)3SCC786

question of sentence. The trial court convicted Ram Chander Rai and Jadunandan Rai under Section 326 of the IPC, and each was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life. They were also convicted separately under Section 326 read … for life. They were also convicted separately under Section 326 read with Sections 34 and 149, IPC, as also under Section 148 of the IPC, … decision the courts were reminded to bear in mind the necessity of proportion between an offence and the penalty. It was further observed that it is not the practice of this Court to interfere by special leave … accepted to this extent. - [ I.D.Dua and; V. Ramaswami, JJ.] -- Criminal trial-Quantum of sentence-Determination of-Principles underlying - The appellant's appeal was admitted by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2012

Raja Alias Kattu RajA. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-17-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 304(1), 324, 326, 302, 506(2); Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 374

steps to secure the custody of the accused to undergo the remaining period of sentence. [R. MALA, J.] Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 304(1), 324, 326, 302, 506(2) -- The trial Court placed the incriminating evidence before the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1971

Ram Sarup Singh and anr. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-25-1971

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 326 Read With 34, 307, 352

Reported in : (1971)3SCC262; 1971(III)LC574(SC)

1966, convicting the above two appellants for an offence under Section 326, read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentencing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years. The Sessions trial proceeded against the two appellants … 514 of 1966, convicting the above two appellants for an offence under Section 326, read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentencing … convicted both by the Sessions Judge as also by the High Court for an offence under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment and to pay Rs 50 as fine. This Court declined to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2008

Radhey Shyam Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-18-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 307 and 326

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW462

appellant Radhey Shyam, S/o Ganga Prasad, original accused No. 2 challenges his conviction for offence under Section 326, Indian Penal Code (hereinafter called `IPC' for short) and the consequent sentence of rigorous imprisonment for 4 years. Initially, the charge … instant appeal, appellant Radhey Shyam, S/o Ganga Prasad, original accused No. 2 challenges his conviction for offence under Section 326, Indian Penal Code (hereinafter called `IPC' for short) and the consequent sentence of rigorous imprisonment for 4

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2010

Ramesh S/O. Tulshiram Mahajan and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jul-15-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 326, 34, 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 313

the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Sessions Case No. 15 of 2008, stands confirmed and maintained. Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 326 - Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means -- The accused are his cousins and … Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Sessions Case No. 15 of 2008, thereby convicting them for offence punishable under Section 326 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, for having voluntarily caused grievous hurt by dangerous weapon

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2012

Gobi. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-24-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 326, 342, 307, 34, 350; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 374(1), 222; Indian Evidence Act - Section 27

to secure the custody of A1/appellant to undergo the remaining period of sentence, if any. [R. MALA, J.] Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 326, 342, 307, 34, 350 -- The trial Court placed the incriminating evidence before the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 2006

Dr. Suchita Chaudhary Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-13-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 202 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 326 and 338

has ordered to issue summons against the petitioner to face trial under Sections 326 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code in Complaint Case No. 58/2004.2. Heard both the sides.3. The case of the complainant (O.P.No. 2) in the … any act at cost of his professional reputation-Extracting money at cost of reputation not sustainable-Negligence under Section 338, IPC can be attracted if element of mens rea exists-Ovaries removed when complainant agreed for total hysterectomy-No case of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial