Advanced Search Results

Raman Kumar Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3034; JT2009(8)SC422; 2009(6)SCALE335; 2009AIRSCW3598; 2009(4)LHSC2266

acquittal of the appellant and two co-accused persons who faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC')3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:Suman

Pramila Patnaik and ors. Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A

Reported in : 1992CriLJ2385; 1992(I)OLR197

Explanation--For the purposes of this section, 'cruelty' shall have the same meaning as in Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).' On a plain reading of this provision it is obvious that if a wife is … suicide or to fulfil illegal demands of husband and in-laws.8. On a close look at the provisions of Sections 304B and 498A, IPC, it is evident that one of the essential ingredients to be established for the offences under both

Manojbhai Laljibhai Kabaria and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961- Sections 4 and 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313, 374 and 394(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114, 201, 302, 304B and 498A

Reported in : (2007)2GLR1697

these appeals have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 304B and under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short) and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short) and sentenced

Kashmir Kaur and anr. Vs. State of Punjab.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B, 34, 498A; Indian Evidecne Act - Section 113-B

be filed. Accordingly, the application for substitution also stands dismissed. [Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN; FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, JJ.] Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B, 34, 498A; Indian Evidecne Act - Section 113-B -- Dowry death --  Where the death

Kanti Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 and 482; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(1) and 113B

Reported in : AIR2009SC2703; 2009(6)SCALE116; (2009)12SCC498; 2009AIRSCW4147

dismissing the appeal of Arvind Kumar [A-1] and Kanti Lal [A-3] and confirming their conviction and sentence under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [for short the 'IPC'] recorded by the learned Sessions Judge, Jalore, in

Sukhram Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 - Sections 2; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 201, 302, 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 222, 313 and 464(2)

Reported in : AIR2007SC3050; 2008(1)ALD(Cri)79; 2008(1)ALT(Cri)159; 2007CriLJ4327; II(2007)DMC348SC; JT2007(10)SC177; 2007(10)SCALE60; (2007)7SCC502; 2007AIRSCW5520; AIR2007SC3050; (2007)3SCC(Cri)426; (2007)3Crimes354(SC); 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)2555; (2007)3SCC(Cri)426;

the said appellants, challenging their conviction and sentence under Section 304B, 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and by the State challenging their acquittal for the offences punishable under Section 302 and … a very short span of ten months of the marriage. Therefore, the appellants had committed offences, punishable under Sections 304B and 498A read with Section 34 IPC. The Trial Court also held that there was no evidence to show that

Reema Aggarwal Vs. Anupam and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B, 307, 494 and 498A; ;Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 11, 16 and 27; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986 - Sections 2; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B

Reported in : AIR2004SC1418; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)452; (2004)3CALLT16(SC); 2004CriLJ892; I(2004)DMC201SC; JT2004(1)SC177; 2004(2)KLT822(SC); 2004(1)SCALE264; (2004)3SCC199

charge sheet was placed and charges were framed for offences punishable under Sections 307 and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC'). Accused persons pleaded innocence. Seven witnesses were examined to further the prosecution version. … failed to establish that first marriage stood dissolved legally, charge under Section 498A was not maintainable as both Sections 304B and 498A IPC presuppose valid marriage - Validity - While construing expression 'husband' it is to cover a person who

Sukanti Moharana Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 307, 304B and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60

Reported in : 2009(5)LHSC2940; 2009AIRSCW6161; JT2009(9)SC697; 2009(II)OLR(SC)561; 2009(10)SCALE246; (2009)9SCC163

by the appellant herein and set aside the conviction of the appellant under Sections 304B, 498A of the Indian Penal Code (for short `the IPC') and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (for short `the D.P. Act') … 498A of IPC and under Section 4 of the D.P. Act whereas Benudhar was convicted and sentenced under Sections 304B and 498A IPC as well as under Section 4 of the D.P. Act. The present appellant Sukanti was sentenced by

Rajendran and anr. Vs. State Asstt. Commnr. of Police Law and Order

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A and 113B; Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A

Reported in : AIR2009SC855; RLW2009(2)SC1388; 2008AIRSCW8162; 2008(6)LHSC4177

the High Court upheld the conviction of the accused persons for offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). Each was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years. The conviction was … of the woman are required to be established in order to bring home the application of Section 498A IPC. Sections 304B and 498A, IPC cannot be held to be mutually inclusive - These provisions deal with two distinct offences - A

Shambhu Raj Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A

Reported in : II(1998)DMC72

Rajasthan- cum, Additional Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, whereby the accused appellant (for short the accused) was convicted under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo 10 years R.I. and three years R1 with fine … on June 27,1995. Her parents were not timely informed by the accused.(ii) Case under Sections 304B and 498A, IPC was registered against the accused and after his arrest investigation commenced. On completion of investigation charge sheet was