Advanced Search Results
V. Kutumba Rao Vs. M. Chandrasekhar Rao and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-20-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 300
2003(2)ALD(Cri)830; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)226; III(2003)BC500; 2003CriLJ4405
Petition as well as the Criminal Revision Case are dismissed. Criminal - res judicata - Section 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 and Section 300 of Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - cheques issued by … irrelevant matters were taken into consideration by the learned Magistrate and held that the charge under Section 420, IPC is not proved against the accused. The learned Magistrate in his judgment stated that the Investigating Officer admitted
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHira Lal Panna Lal Mahi Vs. State of Gujarat
Supreme Court of India
Apr-24-1969
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 420, 466, 468, 471 and 477-A all read with Section 120-B
(1969)3SCC756
for offences punishable under Sections 420, 466, 468, 471 and 477-A all read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The charges against both the accused were as follows:“1. That between 21st October, 1959 and 25th May, 1961 … this appeal, by special leave, is whether the conviction of the appellant for an offence under Section 420 IPC is justified.2. The appellant, who was the first accused and one Gopaldas were tried for offences punishable under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Radhai Vs. C.B.i. CochIn Unit
Supreme Court of India
Sep-28-2007
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 465, 468 and 471
AIR2008SC111; JT2007(12)SC128; 2007(11)SCALE508; (2007)10SCC582; 2007AIRSCW6245; (2007)4Crimes88(SC)
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Ernakulam for offences punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as also under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.4. The Special
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajan Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
Apr-05-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3), 188 and 300(6); Constitution of India - Article 20(1) and 20(2)
2003(1)KLT965
is the accused in Crime 276 of 2001 of Pandalam Police Station registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The above crime was registered on the basis of a complaint given by the 5th respondent in the … is the accused in Crime 276 of 2001 of Pandalam Police Station registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The above crime was registered on the basis of a complaint given by the 5th respondent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnita Mehra Vs. State
Delhi
Oct-13-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 468, 471, 120- B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482
and 471 IPC read with Section 120-B IPC against petitioner Anita Mehra are quashed.29. It is ordered accordingly. Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 420 - Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property -- Which bears the signature of both the complainant
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Nagina Roy and ors. Vs. Mohabir Kanu
Guwahati
Jan-03-1995
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 216, 227, 260 and 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 323 and 420
1987 allowing the prosecution to recall witness/evidence for addition of Section 420, IPC as charge, after completion of evidence.2. The complainant opposite party took a … provision of the above section apparently where a Magistrate summoned an accused under a certain section of the Penal Code but the evidence disclosed an offence under another section the Magistrate can amend or add the charge. When … Class, Silchar in Complaint Case No. 2302C of 1987 allowing the prosecution to recall witness/evidence for addition of Section 420, IPC as charge, after completion of evidence.2. The complainant opposite party took a loan of Rs. 4000/- from
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhupal Anna Bharisheth and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Dec-02-1981
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468; Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion Construction, Sales Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 10 and 11; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420; Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, etc.) Rules, 1964 - Rules 8 and 9; Indian Registration Act
1982(1)BomCR340
that emerges from the police report was as regards the offence of cheating under section 420 of the Indian penal Code. The allegation in the police report was that the said Bhupal Construction Company of the petitioners suppressed from … a written agreement for sale with each flat owner and that such agreement shall be registered under the Indian Registration Act within the prescribed time.9. Section 10 required the promoter to make an application for registration of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Archana Harshwardhan Chaturvedi and Girish J. Chaubey Vs. Commiss ...
Mumbai
Jul-23-2007
Criminal
Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 308, 406, 420 and 498A; Prevention of Women from Domestic Violence Act - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 41(1), 91, 154, 154(1), 154(3), 155, 156, 157 and 189; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1861 - Sections 139; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1872 - Sections 112
(2007)109BOMLR1724
of accused No. 1), for the offence punishable under Sections 498A and 420 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, similarly under Sections 3 and 4 of Prohibition of Dowry Act, as well as under the provisions of … 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act - Police officer registered the complaint under Section 498 A of the IPC and Section 3 and 4 of the Act but refused to register the complaint under Section 420 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaruthi College Engineering and Technology Represented by Its Chairman ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-28-2006
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420
2006CriLJ4407
filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'the Act') and under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code.2. The accused borrowed an amount of Rs. 12,00,000/- from the complainant and when the complainant demanded to … representations and withheld filing of any complaint against the accused under Sections 138 of the Act and 420 IPC, because of the undertaking given by the accused that he would deposit the amount on or before 4.3.2003.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBandi Pandu Vs. Kola Balaji Varma and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-01-2002
CriminalBanking
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3), 200 and 482; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420
2002(2)ALT(Cri)417; II(2003)BC93
ordered accordingly. Criminal - dishonour of cheque - Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 156 (3), 200 and 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - petition seeking quashing of … petitioner committed an offence under Section 138 of theNegotiable Instruments Act (for short 'N.I. Act') and Section 420, IPC. The same was forwarded under Section 156(3), Cr.P.C to the police station, Avanigadda for investigation and report. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »