Advanced Search Results

Ajit Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392, 394 and 397; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 142

Reported in : 1996IIAD(SC)42; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)263; 1996(1)Crimes146(SC); 1996(1)CTC321; JT1996(2)SC234; 1996(4)KarLJ446; 1996(II)OLR(SC)93; 1996(2)SCALE94; (1996)3SCC335; [1996]2SCR318

time he has undergone imprisonment for five years. Criminal - conviction - Sections 392, 394 and 397 of Indian Penal Code - accused charged for offences under Sections 392, 394 and 397 - contended that accused cannot be convicted … Considering the evidence adduced in this case, the learned Designated Court convicted both the accused for offences under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC and also under Section 394 IPC passed a sentence of 10 years rigorous

Jai Parkash Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 392

Reported in : 19(1981)DLT437

appellant Shri Jai Parkash in respect of commission of offences punishable under section 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (in short I.P.G). On 3rd September 1979 said learned Additional Sessions Judge, after hearing arguments, sentenced Jai Parkash … appellant Shri Jai Parkash in respect of commission of offences punishable under section 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (in short I.P.G). On 3rd September 1979 said learned Additional Sessions Judge, after hearing arguments, sentenced

Budh Singh (Now in Tihar Jail), Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392 and 397; Arms Act - Sections 25

Reported in : 29(1986)DLT70

All the four appellants mentioned above have been convicted of offence under Section 392 read with Section 397, Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') by an Additional Sessions Judge vide his judgment dated 30th October 1984. They have been

Yog Raj Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27

Reported in : 38(1989)DLT249

Judgment. (2) Appellants have been convicted of offences punishable under Sections 392 & 397 read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and Section 411 read with Section 34, Ipc, while appellant-Rohtas Singh and appellant-Yograj have been

Salim @ Raju Karamali Ansari and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 392 rw 397 rw. Section 34, 392 rw 397, 461, 468, 471 rw 34; Bombay Police Act. - Section 135

accused were convicted for the offences punishable under Section 392 r/w. Section 397 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- each. … accused were convicted for the offences punishable under Section 392 r/w. Section 397 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay fine of Rs.

Om Prakash and ors Vs State of Jharkhand Through the Secretary, Depart ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392, 197, 120-B, 34, 197(3)

1st Class, Jamshedpur. [AFTAB ALAM; RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, JJ.] Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392, 197, 120-B, 34, 197(3) -- Appellant Kailashpati Singh is the complainant. It is the

Chandranaika Alias Marvadi and ors. Vs. State by Arasikere Rural Polic ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392, 395, 399 and 400; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 2007(6)KarLJ572; ILR2007(4)Kar3989; 2007(6)AIRKarR73(DB)

in S.C. No. 211 of 2002, convicting the appellants-accused for an offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentencing them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- each and … proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused 1, 2, 5 and 6 have committed the offence punishable under Section 392 of the IPC and not under Section 395 of the IPC and Point No. (ii) in the affirmative

Niranjan Singh and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1544

under Sections 392 and 397, I.P.C. are maintained. Criminal - Proper Evidence - Sections 392 and 397 of Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC) - Appellants were alleged with snatching money from complainant and caused injuries to complainant - Trial … him.6. The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that it is a case where no offence under Section 392 or 397 of I.P.C. is made out. It is submitted that no property was seized which goes to

Shankar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : ILR1989Delhi35

and appellant-Prem Chand were charged for an offence punishable under Section 392 read with Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code for having committed robbery on March 14, 1985, at house No. C-1/19, Safdarjang Development Area, New Delhi, at … and appellant-Prem Chand were charged for an offence punishable under Section 392 read with Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code for having committed robbery on March 14, 1985, at house No. C-1/19, Safdarjang Development Area, New

Hariom @ Kalicharan Shiriram and Gopal Agarwal @ Saxena Vs. the State ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 31 and 427(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392 and 397

Reported in : 1994(2)BomCR219

as 'the accused') for an offence of robbery punishable under section 392 read with section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 8 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in … as 'the accused') for an offence of robbery punishable under section 392 read with section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 8 years and to pay a fine of