Advanced Search Results
Sukhdev Singh Vs. State
Delhi
Apr-24-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 173, 299, 300, 302, 304, 307 and 308
2002IVAD(Delhi)944; 2002CriLJ3964; 97(2002)DLT969
trial court vide the judgment and order of 17th August, 1999 for the offence punishable under Section 302 Indian Penal Code and Section 307 of the said Code. On 18th August, 1998 he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment … order of 17th August, 1999 for the offence punishable under Section 302 Indian Penal Code and Section 307 of the said Code. On 18th August, … would be an offence punishable under Section 304 and with respect to the death of the deceased and Section 308 with respect to the injuries on the person of Vijay Kumar could be drawn.9. The whole edifice of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Tr.P.S.Lodhi Colony Vs. Sanjeev Nanda
Supreme Court of India
Aug-03-2012
Criminal
Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections Section 304A, 201, 308, 34, 85, 300(4), 299, 304(2); Motor Vehicles Act - Section 185, 203, 134; provision of Road Safety Act, 1967 ; Road Traffic Act, 1972 -
us today, the judgment and order of conviction passed by Delhi High Court under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is set aside and the order of conviction of Trial Court under Section 304 Part II of the … accused in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi. Respondent was charged under Sections 201, 304 (I), 308 read with 34 of the IPC. The case was registered as Sessions Case No. 25/1999.16. It is important
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSukhdev Singh Vs. Delhi State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Supreme Court of India
Sep-01-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 80, 300, 302, 304, 307 and 308; Constitution of India - Article 136
AIR2003SC3716; 2003CriLJ4315; RLW2004(1)SC17; 2003(7)SCALE102; (2003)7SCC441; 2003(2)LC1483(SC)
J.1. The appellant faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC'). The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi found him guilty of the aforesaid offences and … IPC, but Section 304 Part I IPC was attracted. Similarly, instead of Section 307 it was held that Section 308 IPC was appropriate. Sentences of 10 years and 2 years respectively were awarded.2. The prosecution version as unfolded
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shamsher Khan Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Supreme Court of India
Oct-19-2000
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 299, 304 and 308; Explosive Substances Act - Sections 4; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 5 and 19
AIR2000SC3662; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)363; 2001ALLMR(Cri)371(SC); 2001CriLJ119; 2000(4)CTC622; 2000(7)SCALE253; (2000)8SCC568; [2000]Supp4SCR287; 2001(1)LC94(SC)
Act 1987 ('TADA' for short). They were charged for offences under Sections 304, 308 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 5 of the TADA and Section 4(b) of the Explosive Substances Act. Appellant alone was convicted … and the Explosive Substances Act. He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years. For Section 308 IPC he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years. Apart from the aforesaid substantive sentences fine has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajalana Sambalaxmi Vs. State of A.P.
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-11-1999
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304, 308 and 309; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313
1999(2)ALD556; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)630; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)563
Reddy District at Saroornagar, dated 26-11-1993 convicting the appellant under Sections 304 Part-1, 308 and 309 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing her to simple imprisonment for a period of 5 years on the first charge, one year … an offence under Section 304 Part-I IPC is made out and on the second charge an offence under Section 308 IPC is made out. The appellant has been convicted accordingly and sentenced to simple imprisonment as indicated above
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Haryana Vs. Ghaseeta Ram
Supreme Court of India
Feb-28-1997
CriminalConstitution
Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 45, 46 and 52; Constitution of India - Article 20; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 152, 222, 223, 224, 303, 304-A, 306, 307, 308, 309, 323, 324, 325, 326, 332, 333, 342, 352, 353 and 377; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Good Conduct Prisoners Probational Releases Act, 1926 - Sections 6
AIR1997SC1868; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)687; 1997CriLJ1922; 1997(1)Crimes256(SC); JT1997(3)SC122; 1997(2)SCALE400; (1997)3SCC766; [1997]2SCR547
First Information Report was lodged and the respondent was sent up for trial for various offences under the Indian Penal Code to the Session Court. He was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and various terms of imprisonment … First Information Report was lodged and the respondent was sent up for trial for various offences under the Indian Penal Code to the Session Court. He was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and various terms … jail under Sections 147, 148, 152, 224, 302, 304, 304-A, 306, 307, 308, 323, 324, 325, 326, 332, 333, 352, 353 or 377 of the … are : While undergoing sentence of life imprisonment for an offence under Sections 302/149 and 148 I.P.C. as imposed by the learned Sessions judge, Gurgaon,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Haryana and Others Vs. Mohinder Singh
Supreme Court of India
Feb-07-2000
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 107, 109 and 432; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 121 to 130, 147, 148, 152, 224, 302, 304-A, 306, 307, 308, 323, 324, 325, 326, 332, 333, 352, 353, 376, 377 and 389; Foreigners Act, 1948; Punjab Habitual Offenders (Control and Reform) Act, 1952 - Sections 2(3); Constitution of India - Article 161; Passport Act, 1967; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 3; Official Secrets Act, 1930 - Sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 to 10; Good Conduct Prisioners Probational Release Act, 1926; Haryana Good Conduct Prisonsers (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 - Sections 3 and 4; Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Tenporary Release) Act, 1962
AIR2000SC890; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)535; (2001)1CALLT51(SC); 2000CriLJ1408; JT2000(1)SC629; RLW2000(2)SC241; 2000(1)SCALE465; (2000)3SCC394; [2000]1SCR698; 2000(1)LC463(SC)
an offence committed after admission to jail under Section 147, 148, 152, 224, 302, 304, 304-A, 306, 307, 308, 323, 324, 325, 326, 332, 333, 352, 353 or 377 of the Indian Penal Code, or of an … SLP (Cri) 643/99) question is if the prisoner, who is convicted of an offence under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code (IPC), though confined in jail, is entitled to remission of his sentence when the Government circular issued under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhan Bahadur Vs. State
Delhi
Apr-28-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304 and 308
2008CriLJ4795; 2008(103)DRJ398
whereby they were convicted for the offence punishable under Section 304(Part I) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and were awarded sentence of five years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5000/- each with a … rukka and the same was sent to the police station on the basis of which case FIR Under Section 308 IPC bearing FIR No. 86/95 was registered. IO later on arrested Dhan Bahadur. Accused Lal Singh was subsequently
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCourt on Its Own Motion Vs. State and ors.
Delhi
Aug-21-2008
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1972 - Sections 2; Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984 - Sections 78; Representation of the People Act, 1951; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Parliament Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304 and 308; Evidence Act - Sections 7 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 215
2009CriLJ677; 151(2008)DLT695; 2008(105)DRJ557
these decisions are not at all relevant since we are not dealing with a criminal offence under the Indian Penal Code. Moreover, as already noted, contempt jurisdiction is a summary jurisdiction and a trial is not called for unless … six persons. The police registered a case under Section 304 read with Sections 308 and 34 of the IPC and commenced their investigations. During the course of investigations, Mr. Kulkarni came forward as an eye witness to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaldev Raj Kapur Vs. State
Delhi
Feb-06-2009
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 299, 300, 304, 304A, 308 and 427; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 299
2009CriLJ1418; 157(2009)DLT747
Sessions Judge dated 25.4.2005 whereby the trial court, while discharging the petitioner for offences under Sections 304A/308 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) concluded that, prima facie a case for offences under Sections 304 Part II/308 … II) of IPC.10. The trial court went wrong in interpreting the provisions contained in Sections 299 and 300 IPC. Section 299 IPC defines culpable homicide which may amount to murder within the meaning of Section 300 IPC or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »