Advanced Search Results

Hazara Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 308, 325 and 326; Uttar Pradesh Police Regulation - Regulation 104

Reported in : AIR1969SC951; 1969CriLJ1428; (1969)2SCC22

the section should consider whether the circumstances are such as to justify the registration of a case under Section 307 or 308 of the Indian Penal Code. Cases registered under either of these section s must be promptly … any particular class of offences in any particular area:.(2) In cases under Sections 325 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code.... ' There is a note appended to Regulation 104 which reads:In all cases of hurt, inflicted with a … any particular area:.(2) In cases under Sections 325 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code.... ' There is a note appended to Regulation 104 which

State of Haryana Vs. Ghaseeta Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 45, 46 and 52; Constitution of India - Article 20; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 152, 222, 223, 224, 303, 304-A, 306, 307, 308, 309, 323, 324, 325, 326, 332, 333, 342, 352, 353 and 377; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Good Conduct Prisoners Probational Releases Act, 1926 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1997SC1868; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)687; 1997CriLJ1922; 1997(1)Crimes256(SC); JT1997(3)SC122; 1997(2)SCALE400; (1997)3SCC766; [1997]2SCR547

offences punishable under Section 304-A, 309, 325 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code; (4) any offence … First Information Report was lodged and the respondent was sent up for trial for various offences under the Indian Penal Code to the Session Court. He was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and various terms of imprisonment … First Information Report was lodged and the respondent was sent up for trial for various offences under the Indian Penal Code to the Session Court. He was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and various terms … 148, 152, 224, 302, 304, 304-A, 306, 307, 308, 323, 324, 325, 326, 332, 333, 352, 353 … are : While undergoing sentence of life imprisonment for an offence under Sections 302/149 and 148 I.P.C. as imposed by the learned Sessions judge, Gurgaon, … Additional Sessions Judge and various terms of imprisonment for offences under Section 307/149 I.P.C.; 342/149 I.P.C.; 332/149 I.P.C.; 148 and 224 I.P.C. were imposed upon

State of Haryana and Others Vs. Mohinder Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 107, 109 and 432; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 121 to 130, 147, 148, 152, 224, 302, 304-A, 306, 307, 308, 323, 324, 325, 326, 332, 333, 352, 353, 376, 377 and 389; Foreigners Act, 1948; Punjab Habitual Offenders (Control and Reform) Act, 1952 - Sections 2(3); Constitution of India - Article 161; Passport Act, 1967; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 3; Official Secrets Act, 1930 - Sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 to 10; Good Conduct Prisioners Probational Release Act, 1926; Haryana Good Conduct Prisonsers (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 - Sections 3 and 4; Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Tenporary Release) Act, 1962

Reported in : AIR2000SC890; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)535; (2001)1CALLT51(SC); 2000CriLJ1408; JT2000(1)SC629; RLW2000(2)SC241; 2000(1)SCALE465; (2000)3SCC394; [2000]1SCR698; 2000(1)LC463(SC)

of an offence committed after admission to jail under Section 147, 148, 152, 224, 302, 304, 304-A, 306, 307, 308, 323, 324, 325, 326, 332, 333, 352, 353 or 377 of the Indian Penal Code, or of … SLP (Cri) 643/99) question is if the prisoner, who is convicted of an offence under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code (IPC), though confined in jail, is entitled to remission of his sentence when the Government circular issued under Section

Chanabasappa and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Criminal

assault the complainant's son Basavaraj, and thereby they committed the offences U/s. 143, 147, 148 r/w 149 of Indian Penal Code? (ii) Does prosecution further prove beyond reasonable doubt that, all accused in furtherance of their common object have … and 308, I.P.C. show that they make provision for punishing those who attempt to commit certain offences. While Section 307 is linked with murder punishable under Section 302, I.P.C., Section 308 is linked with the offence of culpable … 6 for the offence p/u/s 324 and 326 r/w Sec. 149 of IPC and the Appellants / Accused No. 1 and 6 are sentenced to

Varghese Cheriyan and Others Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

dismissed as withdrawn, no orders are required to be passed in the instant application. 2. Dismissed as infructuous. Indian Penal Code, 1860 €“ Section 186, Section 307, Section 308, Section 326, Section 332, Section 353 €“ Public Property Damages … two FIRs namely FIR No.338/2000 dated 10.05.2000 (PS Lajpat Nagar) instituted for offences under Sections 186/353/332/308 of the IPC read with Sections 3/4 of the Public Property Damages Act and FIR No.407/2000 dated 07.06.2000 (PS Lajpat Nagar)

Vishal @ Chinki Vs. State .

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 307, 326, 308

the judgment dated 9th August, 2010 whereby the appellant was convicted by the trial Court under Section 307 IPC read with Section 34 and order on sentence whereby he was sentenced to undergo RI for 03 years … whereby the appellant was convicted by the trial Court under Section 307 IPC read with Section 34 and order on sentence whereby he was sentenced … preferred against the judgment dated 9th August, 2010 whereby the appellant was convicted by the trial Court under Section 307 IPC read with Section 34 and order on sentence whereby he was sentenced to undergo RI for 03 … most it would be a case under Section 326 IPC and the conviction of the appellant under … of the appellant should have been under Section 308 IPC read with Section 34 instead of Section … of Lidia praying to set aside the order of the learned City Civil Judge, Bangalore City, sitting in Court. Hall No.8 in Aacexure-E order dated

Bharat Ram Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307, 308, 323 and 326

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT113(CG)

Am-bikapur (Sarguja).18. Criminal Appeal allowed. Criminal - Alteration of Conviction - Sections 307, 308, 323 and 324 of Indian Penal Code, 1860(IPC) - Appellant was accused of offence of attempt to murder of complainant - Trial Court convicted him … Sessions Trial No. 295/90 by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Ambikapur dated 4-12-99 convicting the appellant under Section 307, IPC and sentencing him to R.I. for five years.2. The prosecution case in brief is that due to … that the victim Ram Manik, who is facing a prosecution under Section 326, IPC on a repprt lodged by the present appellant to encash the

L. Ravindran Vs. the Commissioner of Police,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Sections 49A and 75; ;Town Nuisance Act - Section 3; ;Madras Gaming Act, 1930 - Section 4; ;Tamil Nadu Restriction of Habitual Offenders Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 2(4), 3, 5, 6, 8 and 16(1); ;Police Act, 1861 - Section 23; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 75, 160, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 239, 240, 242, 243, 294, 299, 307, 308, 310, 322, 326, 327, 328, 329, 332, 333, 369, 382, 383, 385, 386, 387, 390, 391, 392 to 394, 395 to 402, 457, 458, 459 and 460; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 106, 107, 109, 110 and 356; ;Punjab Police Rules, 1933 - Rule 23.4(3) and 23.9(2); ;Punjab Police Rules, 1934

Superintendent or Divisional Officer, if so empowered by the Superintendent.-(a) Persons once convicted under any Section of the Indian Penal Code are considered to be likely to commit crime;(b) Persons, not convicted, but believed to be addicted to crime.(2) … 234, 235, 239, 240, 242 and 243 under Chapter XII, Sections 299, 307, 308, 310, 322, 326, 327, 328, 329, 332, 333 and 369 under … death. If these ingredients are proved by the prosecution then the conviction of the accused under Section 304B, IPC will be complete.[para 9] The question is, in the absence of corpus delicti, could it be presumed that

Sukhlal and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 148Ind.Cas.999

Indian Penal Code, will not save them from being tried on the same evidence for an offence under4. Section 307, Indian Penal Code, i. e., an offence of attempted murder, which the Magistrate who has acquitted them was … the two applicants have been acquitted of offences under Sections 323 and 326, Indian Penal Code, will not save them from being tried on the … committed to Sessions on a charge under Section 308, Indian Penal Code. The Sessions Judge remarked:All the … in the following circumstances. Four persons were charged before a first class Magistrate with offences under Section 328, Indian Penal Code. Two of them were convicted under that section and sentenced to terms of imprisonment and the other two … were charged before a first class Magistrate with offences under Section 328, Indian Penal Code. Two of them were convicted under that section and sentenced

State of M.P. Vs. Ramdeen and 5 ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 307, 308, 323, 324 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 227, 228 and 228(1)

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1192

complaining of the commission of the offences punishable Under Sections 323, 324, 307/149, 147 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code. The case was committed to the Court of Session, which on hearing the parties on question of framing … of doubt to the accused, altering the conviction to one Under Section 326 from that Under Section 307, IPC. Left in doubt about the intention … in transferring the case to C. J.M. Morena.5. Applicability of Section 308, IPC is attracted when the accused has done an act with the intention … is whether or not, looking to the nature of injuries sustained by Mahesh and Bishambhardayal, a charge Under Section 307 I.P.C. should have been framed and hence whether the Session Court was justified in transferring the case to