Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian penal code ipc section 304 · Page 1 of about 13,006 results (0.152 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 24 2002

Harlal @ Harlal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-24-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 300, 302, 304, 304(I), 304(II) and 323

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj240; 2002(4)WLN125

is on bail, he shall surrender before the trial court for serving out the remaining period of sentence. Penal Code, 1860 - Section 304 Part I & II--Culpable homicide not amounting to murder--Accused gave a Lathi blow on … 5/87, by which he acquitted the accused appellant of the charges for the offence under Sections 147, 323 IPC, but convicted him for theoffence under Section 304 Part-I IPC in place of 302 IPC and sentenced him

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2012

Alister Anthony Pareira Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-12-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 (IPC) - Sections 304, 338, 337, 279, 336, 337, 338, 427, 299, 300; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 185; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Section 66 (1)(b) ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 313, 464, 342; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Section 4

by the High Court for the offences punishable under Sections 304 Part II, 338 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). 2. The prosecution case against the appellant is this: the repair and construction work of the … that a first information report (No. 838) was registered under Section 304, 279, 336, 337, 338 and 427 IPC; Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Section 66 (1)(b) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. 4. On

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 1993

State of Karanataka Vs. Balappa and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-23-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304-B and 498-A;

Reported in : II(1999)DMC559

No. 25/1990 in acquitting A-1 and A-2 for offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 304-B read with 34, IPC has presented this criminal appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution was that deceased Amarawwa got married to … No. 25/1990 in acquitting A-1 and A-2 for offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 304-B read with 34, IPC has presented this criminal appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution was that deceased Amarawwa got married to … under Sections 498-A and 304-B read with 34, IPC has presented this criminal appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution was that deceased Amarawwa got … S.C. No. 25/1990 in acquitting A-1 and A-2 for offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 304-B read with 34, IPC has presented this criminal appeal.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 04 2011

Shaik Moulana Saheb Vs. the State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-04-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304-B, 498-A, 306; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 161

not required to be detained in any other case. 15. In the result, the appeal is partly allowed. Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 304-B - Dowry death -- Dr. Satyanarayana Rao, the learned Counsel for the appellant contended that absolutely there

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2009

Mohammad Nazir and anr. Vs. Kaizad Gustad and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-29-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 182, 201, 304 and 304(A); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 227

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3889

Judge, Mumbai discharging the accused from the charges of offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code.2. The victim Nadiya Khan was working as an Assistant Director with the accused where he was shooting one … Upon trial, Trial Court discharged the accused from charges of offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of IPC - Hence, present criminal revision application - Applicants contended that the act of the accused constituted offence in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2006

Parminder Singh S/O Shrimava Singh Vs. State of Karnataka by H.A.L. Po ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-17-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 11, 101 to 104, 105 and 106; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428

Reported in : 2007(2)KarLJ7; 2007(2)KCCR1409; 2007(2)AIRKarR256(DB)

burden of proving the existence of circumstances bringing the case within any of the General Exceptions in the Indian Penal Code (XLV of 1860), or within any special exception or proviso contained in any other part of the same … conviction recorded for the offence under Section 302 IPC and to convict the accused for the offence under Section 304 Part I or Part II as the case may be.4. Learned Addl State Public Prosecutor Sri. N. Rudramuni

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2006

Jairam Singh, Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-19-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3, 4, 304B and 498A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304, 304B and 498A; Criminal Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR654(Jhr)]

Mortem report. He relied upon this circumstantial evidence and came to find that an offence under Section 304 IPC of the Indian Penal Code has been committed by the appellants accordingly he has sentenced them to serve … Sessions Judge, Jamshedpur whereby and whereunder they have been convicted for the offence under Section 304(ii) of the Indian Penal Code and have been sentenced to undergo Rigorous imprisonment for three years.2. Brief facts leading to their conviction are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2002

Kamulu Bhotra @ Majhi Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-05-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304

Reported in : 93(2002)CLT415

No. 241 of 1992) convicting the appellant (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused') under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') for alleged commission of murder of one Dhanu Bhotra on 12.6.1992 in village … to do away with the life of the deceased, and at best he can be held guilty under Section 304, Part-ll of IPC. In support of her contention Smt. Das placed reliance on the decisions reported in 91

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 1997

Sudhir Samanta Vs. State of W.B. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-21-1997

Subject : PropertyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 149, 302 and 304

Reported in : AIR1997SC4263; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)830; 1998CriLJ495; JT1997(8)SC677; 1997(6)SCALE489; (1998)1SCC581

ordered to be cancelled.31. Appeals allowed as stated above. Criminal - intention - Sections 300 and 304 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - accused charged under Section 304 Part I - question of accused having common intention required for … Before the Sessions Court, Midnapore, all the nine accused stood charged with commission of offence under Section 148 IPC; Section 304 (Part I) IPC read with Section 149 IPC; and Section 323 IPC read with Section 149. By his

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2003

State of Rajasthan Vs. Dhool Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-18-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 300, 302 to 304 and 326; Arms Act - Sections 4 and 25; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2004SC1264; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)351; 2004CriLJ931; JT2003(10)SC179; RLW2004(1)SC70; 2003(10)SCALE842; (2004)12SCC546; 2004(1)LC670(SC)

will undergo the remainder of the sentence imposed by the trial court.20. The appeal is allowed. Criminal - Indian Penal Code - Section 300, 302, 304, 326 - Findings of both courts below as regards the incident in question … Police of Pahada Police Station filed a chargesheet against the respondent herein for offences punishable under Section 302 IPC as also under Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. Learned Sessions Judge-II, Udaipur, in Sessions Case

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial