Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian penal code ipc section 300 · Page 1 of about 10,945 results (0.359 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 17 2006

Parminder Singh S/O Shrimava Singh Vs. State of Karnataka by H.A.L. Po ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-17-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 11, 101 to 104, 105 and 106; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428

Reported in : 2007(2)KarLJ7; 2007(2)KCCR1409; 2007(2)AIRKarR256(DB)

burden of proving the existence of circumstances bringing the case within any of the General Exceptions in the Indian Penal Code (XLV of 1860), or within any special exception or proviso contained in any other part of the same … not a ground to hold that the accused is not entitled to claim any exceptions as provided under Section 300 IPC and submitted a plea of alibi is the principles of evidence whereas the exception provided are under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1971

Suresh Chand Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-19-1971

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302

Reported in : 1972CriLJ1416; ILR1971Delhi772

that the attack on the deceased was by mistake or by accident. The plea under exception I to section 300 Indian Penal Code is. thereforee, not open to the appellant. (7) The learned counsel for the appellant next … Delhi, in Sessions Case No. 2 of 1969, convicting the appellant herein for an offence under section 302 Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to imprisonment for life and also for an offence under Section 324 of Indian Penal … knife while the deceased himself was unarmed. Exception 4 to section 300 Ipc, thereforee, cannot be invoked. (8) The question that now remains for consideration

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1996

Ramesh Nana Ghorpade Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-11-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302, 304, 323, 436 and 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 1996(3)BomCR572; 1996CriLJ2185; 1997(1)MhLj16

Kamath left no stone unturned. Appeal partly allowed. Criminal - conviction - Sections 302, 304 and 436 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant convicted under section 302 - involvement of appellant in case cannot be denied - there … his injuries on the spot, the act of the appellant would clearly fall within the mischief contemplated by Section 300 IPC., the breach of which is punishable under section 302 IPC. We have carefully examined the contentions canvassed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 11 1995

Sudam Kisan Dhurjad Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302, 304, 323 and 452

Reported in : 1996(1)BomCR156; 1995CriLJ4029

at an early date. 25. Appeal dismissed Criminal - murder - Sections 300, 302, 323 and 452 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal against conviction under Sections 302, 323 and 452 - appellant assaulted with axe on forehead … act of the appellant would squarely fall in the ambit of the second, third and fourth clauses of Section 300, IPC; the breach of which is punishable under Section 302, IPC. In our judgment, the appellant has been

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 1963

Akhtar Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-11-1963

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304

Reported in : AIR1964All262; 1964CriLJ617

to one under Section 304 Indian Penal Code by giving Akhtar the benefit of Exception No. 1 of Section 300 Indian Penal Code.5. The first difficulty in this case arises from the fact that none of the prosecution … this evidence, the question arises whether the conviction of Akhtar can be converted from one under Section 302. Indian Penal Code to one under Section 304 Indian Penal Code by giving Akhtar the benefit of Exception No. 1 of … the conviction of Akhtar can be converted from one under Section 302. Indian Penal Code to one under Section 304 Indian Penal Code by giving

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1954

Faqira Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-26-1954

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302

Reported in : AIR1955All321; 1955CriLJ884

appellant and that he made the attack only with fists. Dr. Nand Lal in his commentary on the Indian Penal Code, 1929 Ed. Volume II pages 1369-70, while discussing the case of a man who makes a very violent … the presumption that has been raised against the accused.In other words, the Indian Law has prescribed both an objective as well as a subjective test … Court in -- 'Behari v. State', AIR 1953 All 203 (A), the case fell under Clause 3 of Section 300, I, P. C., and the offence amounted to murder. The learned Sessions Judge in the alternative thought that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2004

Prakash Chand Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-09-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)612; 2004(6)SCALE495; (2004)11SCC381

committed fratricide. He was found guilty by the Trial Court for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. In appeal, conviction and sentence were … during the course of a sudden quarrel, and Section 302 IPC has no application and Exception 4 to Section 300 I.P.C. is applicable. The plea was reiterated during the course of hearing of the present appeal. Additionally, it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2007

Anil Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-10-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 300 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 174

Reported in : 2007CriLJ4294; JT2007(7)SC238; 2007(7)SCALE56; (2007)10SCC274; 2007AIRSCW5230; (2007)3Crimes15(SC)

learned Counsel urged that as nobody could anticipate that the fired shot would hit Dinesh; Exception 4 to Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code is attracted in their case.7. Mr. Rajeev Gaur, learned Counsel appearing on behalf … the judgment and order dated 27.03.2003 convicting him for commission of an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.2. The family of the appellant and the family of Dinesh (deceased) … part of the rule of law. Under Clause 'thirdly' of Section 300 IPC. culpable homicide is murder, if both the following conditions are satisfied: i.e.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2007

Gopal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-12-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302

Reported in : AIR2008SC216; JT2007(12)SC24; 2007(12)SCALE179; 2007AIRSCW6605

High Court, Aurangabad Bench, upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC').3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:Paridharinath Vaidya (P.W.7), P. S. I. … of wood blow was given and, therefore, the Section 302 IPC has no application, and Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC applies.Learned Counsel for the State supported the judgment of the High Court.8. For bringing in operation of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2001

Parbat Singh @ Partap Singh Vs. the State, Delhi Administration

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-31-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT290; 2001(59)DRJ712

to an accused so as to bring his act within the first Exception to Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code. (3) The metal background created by eth previous act of the victim may be taken into consideration in … appellant Parbat Singh @Partap Singh for committing offence or murder of Mota and Ms. Dhapa under Section 302 IPC and has sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 3000/- and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial