Advanced Search Results
Mohammad Khalid S/O Mohammad Khaleel Vs. Chief Commissioner, Delhi
Delhi
Mar-02-1967
Media and CommunicationCriminal
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 99, 99-A, 99-B and 99-D; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124, 153, 153-A and 295
AIR1968Delhi13a; 1968CriLJ50a
different classes of citizens of India and the publication of which is punishable under Section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code (Act 45 of 1860). Now, thereforee, on the above-stated grounds and in exercise of the powers conferred by … different classes of citizens of India and the publication of which is punishable under Section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code (Act 45 of 1860). Now, thereforee, on the above-stated grounds and in exercise of the powers … ORDER(1) The brief facts, giving rise to this application under Section 99-B, of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) … with and it is nto enough to merely reproduce the language of Sections 124A, 153A or 295A without specifying as to how or in what
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKatta Surendera Vs. State of A.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jun-13-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106, 302, 304 and 324
2008(2)ALD(Cri)394; 2008(56)BLJR2249; 2008CriLJ3196; (2008)11SCC360; 2008(2)LC819(SC); 2008AIRSCW4271; 2008(3)AICLR554; 2008(4)Supreme605; 2008(4)LH(SC)2310
Andhra Pradesh High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). By judgment dated 20th July, 2006 the High Court dismissed the appeal so … such offences in relation to property. Section 99 lays down the limits of the right of private defence. Sections 96 and 98 give a right of private defence against certain offences and acts. The right given under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShriram Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Nov-24-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106, 147, 149, 302, 304 and 323
2004(1)ALD(Cri)304; 2004CriLJ610; JT2003(9)SC293; 2004(2)MPHT398; 2003(10)SCALE312; (2004)9SCC292
seven others faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 147, 302 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC'). The appellant was found guilty of offence punishable under Sections 147 and 302 … offences of theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass, and attempts at such offences in relation to property. Section 99 lays down the limits of the right of private defence. Sections, 96 and 98 give a right of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Madan and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Jul-11-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106, 149, 302, 304 and 323; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 386
AIR2008SC3083; 2008CriLJ3950; JT2008(8)SC156; 2008(10)SCALE33; (2008)11SCC657; 2008AIRSCW5173; 2008(3)Crimes102
offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 323 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). Each of the appellants was sentenced to undergo RI for life and to … criminal trespass, and attempts at such offences in relation to property. Section 99 IPC lays down the limits of the right of private defence. Sections … then in right of private defence they are entitled to get the benefit of exception in terms of Sections 96 and 97 IPC. The High Court turned down the stand and upheld the conviction.4. In support of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadhe Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Supreme Court of India
Jul-07-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106, 299, 300 and 302
AIR2008SC2878; 2008(9)SCALE638; (2008)11SCC785; 2008CriLJ3520; 2008AIRSCW4751
Judge, Manendragarh. The trial Court had found the appellant guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') but found the co-accused, namely, Kashi and Dev Kumar to be not guilty. … such offences in relation to property. Section 99 lays down the limits of the right of private defence. Sections 96 and 98 give a right of private defence against certain offences and acts. The right given under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDharam and ors. Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Dec-08-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96, 97, 99, 100, 102, 105, 148, 149, 300(4), 302, 304, 323 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313
AIR2007SC397; 2007CriLJ791; JT2007(1)SC299; 2006(13)SCALE280; 2006AIRSCW6298; (2007)1Crimes363(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)1028; 2007(1)KCCR701(SC);
No. 135 of 1994 (Sonipat) for having committed offences under Sections 148, 302, 323 and 324/149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC'). The Trial Court found them guilty; convicted them for offences punishable under all the … whether one's own or another person's against certain specified offences, namely, theft, robbery, mischief and criminal trespass. Section 99 IPC lays down exceptions to which rule of self defence is subject. Section 100 IPC provides, inter alia,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh
Supreme Court of India
Nov-18-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 to 106, 300, 302, 304 and 338; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105
2005CriLJ652; JT2004(10)SC584; 2004(9)SCALE435; (2005)9SCC705
Court. The respondent faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 302 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Originally his father Ram Kirpal, brother Rakesh and mother Nonibai also faced trial … offences of theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass, and attempts at such offences in relation to property. Section 99 lays down the limits of the right of private defence. Sections 96 and 98 give a right of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatya NaraIn Yadav Vs. Gajanand and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-01-2008
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106, 149, 302, 307, 323 and 447; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 372 to 394, 417, 418, 423 and 423(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417
AIR2008SC3284; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)785; JT2008(8)SC432; 2009(I)OLR(SC)78; RLW2009(1)SC263; 2008(10)SCALE728; 2008AIRSCW5562; 2008(3)Crimes295; 2008(5)LH(SC)3044
Additional Sessions Judge, No. 2, Bundi, Rajasthan, had convicted Gajanand for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine … criminal trespass, and attempts at such offences in relation to property. Section 99 lays down the limits of the right of private defence. Sections 96 … v. Mohd. Musheer Khan : 1977CriLJ1897 , and Mohinder Pal Jolly v. State of Punjab : 1979CriLJ584 . Sections 100 to 101 define the extent of the right of private defence of body. If a person has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaveen Chandra Vs. State of Uttranchal
Supreme Court of India
Nov-27-2006
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 96, 100, 101, 102, 105, 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 366
AIR2007SC363; 2007CriLJ874; [2007(2)JCR247(SC)]; RLW2007(3)SC2143; 2006(12)SCALE456; 2006(3)ShimLC405; (2007)1Crimes207(SC); 2006AIRSCW6230;
two others i.e. parents of the appellant. Appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (in short the 'IPC') read with Section 34 of the IPC. While the appellant was awarded death … criminal trespass, and attempts at such offences in relation to property. Section 99 lays down the limits of the right of private defence. Sections 96 … v. Mohd. Musheer Khan : 1977CriLJ1897 , and Mohinder Pal Jolly v. State of Punjab : 1979CriLJ584 . Sections 100 to 101 define the extent of the right of private defence of body. If a person has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRanveer Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-21-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106, 109, 302 and 304
AIR2009SC1658; 2009CriLJ1534; [2009(2)JCR110(SC)]; JT2009(1)SC544; 2009(2)KLJ92; 2009(1)SCALE740; (2009)3SCC384; 2009(1)LC361(SC); 2009AIRSCW1182; 2009(1)LHSC423; 2009CriLJ1534; 2009(2)SCC(Cri)110; 2009(3)KCCRSN133; 2009AIRSCW1182; 2009(1)LHSC423; 2009CriLJ1534; 2009(2)SCC(Cri)110
302 read with Section 109 or in the alternative under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). He was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.3. The High Court by the … The High Court by the impugned judgment altered the conviction to Section 304 Part I IPC read with Sections 109 and 34 IPC. He was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for 5 years and to pay a fine … criminal trespass, and attempts at such offences in relation to property. Section 99 lays down the limits of the right of private defence. Sections 96
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »