Advanced Search Results
Sannaia Subba Rao and ors. Vs. State of A.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-24-2008
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 35; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363, 366A, 368, 372 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 222 and 378
2008(56)BLJR2583; RLW2008(3)SC2689; 2008(10)SCALE401; 2008AIRSCW6014; 2008(3)Crimes174; 2008(4)LH(SC)2955
Hyderabad, convicting the three appellants under the provisions of Section 366A and Section 372 read with Section 511 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short `IPC') and requiring each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 … 49 days and was subjected to mental harassment and torture. The charge-sheet was submitted under the provisions of Sections 366A, 363, 368 and 372 read with Section 511 IPC.26. The learned Trial Judge, however, framed charge against
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKapoor Chand Maganlal Chanderia Vs. Delhi State (Administration)
Supreme Court of India
Apr-16-1985
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 207-A(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 403, 420, 438, 467, 471 and 511
1985(1)Crimes987(SC); 1985(1)SCALE1003; 1985Supp(1)SCC268; [1985]3SCR773; 1985(17)LC816(SC)
make out a case for framing of a charge under Section 420 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, we do feel that no useful purpose would be served by subjecting the appellant to another prosecution … make out a case for framing of a charge under Section 420 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, we do feel that no useful purpose would be served by subjecting the appellant to … under Section 438 of the Code for quashing of the charge under Sections 467 and 471 read with Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Balakrishna Reddy Vs. Director, Cbi, New Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Mar-14-2008
Criminal
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6(1); Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 7, 9 and 11(1); Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 417, 418, 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 482; Business Rule - Rules 12, 13 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 77, 77(2), 166, 166(1), 166(2) and 166(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197
AIR2008SC1754; 2008(56)BLJR1575; JT2008(4)SC162; 2008(4)SCALE617; (2008)4SCC409
under Sections 420, 471, 474, 467, 468 and 417 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for short). A charge-sheet was filed in the Court of Special Magistrate, Central Bureau of Investigation ('CBI' … to be issued by the Central Government under Section 3 of the Delhi Act specifying offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as also under several other Acts has been issued on September 7, 1989 and has been placed by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Md. Kalam Vs. the State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Jun-13-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376, 376(2) and 511
2008(2)ALD(Cri)432; 2008(3)ALT(Cri)52; 2008CriLJ3194; (2008)7SCC257
had questioned the correctness of conviction for offence punishable under Section 376 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and sentence of 10 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.500/- with default … appeal filed by the appellant by which he had questioned the correctness of conviction for offence punishable under Section 376 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and sentence of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKoppula Venkat Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Mar-10-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 122, 375, 376, 399 and 511
AIR2004SC1874; 2004CriLJ1804; JT2004(3)SC328; 2004(3)SCALE96; (2004)3SCC602
Court and upheld by Learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC'). He was sentenced to undergo 10 years RI by the Trial Court which … Section 511 is a general provision dealing with attempts to commit offences not made punishable, by other specific sections. It makes punishable all attempts to commit offences punishable with imprisonment and not only those punishable with death.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askincome-tax Officer Vs. Dharamchand Surana
Chennai
Mar-10-1995
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 273(A) and (C), 276C and 276C(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420 and 511
[1995]216ITR678(Mad)
in E.O.C.C. No. 705 of 1983 for the offences under sections 193 and 420 read with section 511, Indian Penal Code, 1860, and section 276C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The respondent was carrying on business in jewellery … in E.O.C.C. No. 705 of 1983 for the offences under sections 193 and 420 read with section 511, Indian Penal Code, 1860, and section 276C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The respondent was carrying on business
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan Vs. Madan Singh
Supreme Court of India
Feb-01-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376, 376(1), 376(2) and 511
AIR2008SC1292; 2008CriLJ1939; JT2008(2)SC158; 2008(2)SCALE211; (2008)5SCC147
Single Judge by the impugned judgment while upholding the conviction for offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), reduced the sentence from 10 years to 7 years. 2. The respondent allegedly … at Jodhpur. A learned Single Judge by the impugned judgment while upholding the conviction for offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), reduced the sentence from 10 years to … the offence at best was one under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC. It was submitted that the accused had suffered custody of about
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of H.P. Vs. M.P. Gupta
Supreme Court of India
Dec-09-2003
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 193, 196, 197, 197(1) and 197(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2)(1), 6 and 6(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898
2004(1)ALD(Cri)283; 2004(1)BLJR429; JT2003(10)SC32; 2003(10)SCALE522; (2004)2SCC349
was for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 120-B, Section 420 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC'), Section 5(2) (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short the … Single Judge of the High Court held that the change framed against the accused for the offence under Sections 467, 468 and 471 IPC were to be sat aside and quashed. The charge in respect of other
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkripal S/O Shyamlal Charmakar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Mar-19-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 122, 354, 375, 376, 399 and 511
2007CriLJ2302; JT2007(4)SC393; 2007(I)OLR(SC)803; 2007(4)SCALE438; 2007AIRSCW2198; (2007)3Crimes115(SC)
learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Satna. Appellant was found guilty of offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years.3. Prosecution version as unfolded … the judgment of the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Satna. Appellant was found guilty of offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and was sentenced to undergo RI for … the offence can be in terms of Section 354 IPC or Section 511 IPC.Per contra, learned Counsel for the respondent-State submitted that the Trial Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPandharinath Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Jul-06-2009
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376 to 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 222
2009(57)BLJR2916; JT2009(8)SC688; RLW2009(2)SC2290; 2009(9)SCALE62; 2009(7)LC3407(SC)
of the High Court of Bombay, convicting the appellant herein under the provisions of Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short `IPC'). The trial court, after convicting the appellant under Section 376 IPC sentenced him to … its Judgment and Order dated 31.01.2003 held the appellant guilty under Section 511 of the IPC for the offence of attempt to commit rape and … In terms of the aforesaid charge sheet, charges were framed against the accused-appellant for committing the offence under Sections 376 IPC. When the charge was explained to the accused, he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »