Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: indian penal code ipc 1860 sections 4b · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 09 2006

Duroflex Ltd. Vs. Johnny Mathew

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-09-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 10, 10E(1), (1A), (4B) to (4D), 10F, 18, 111, 111(1), 111(2), 111(3), 111(4), 111(5), 111(7), 111(10), 113(4), 155 and 155(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29(2) and 137 - Article 137; Maharashtra Rent Control Act - Sections 18; Telangana Area Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 8A; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Securities Act, 1992; Special Court Act - Sections 9A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 196; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21

Reported in : (2008)2CompLJ314(Ker); [2007]75SCL569(Ker)

shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), and for the purpose of Section 196 of that Code.The above provisions would show that … shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), and for the purpose of Section 196 of that Code.The above provisions would

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1997

Chander Pal Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 4B

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)1093; 67(1997)DLT571; II(1997)DMC155; 1997(42)DRJ113

unless and until wanted in any other case. This appeal is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 304B--Dowry death--498A--Cruelty--Died of burning--Dying declaration--Testimony of--Deceased's sister not deposed about cruelty--Correctness of reliability of--Discussed--A case … years. From the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, no case is made out under Sections 304-B or 498-A Ipc, which read as under:- '304-BDowry death - (1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2017

Naval Kishore vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2017

Subject : Criminal

appellant herein Naval Kishore was convicted for the commission of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 and vide the impugned order on sentence dated 30.07.2014, he was sentenced to imprisonment for life and to … dated 26.07.2014, the accused/the appellant herein Naval Kishore was convicted for the commission of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 and vide the impugned order on sentence dated 30.07.2014, he

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 16 2012

Jameel Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-16-2012

Subject : Criminal

dated 04.02.2009, whereby the appellant has been held guilty and convicted for the offences punishable under Section 376 Indian Penal Code, 1860. Also challenged the order on sentence dated 09.02.2009 whereby, appellant was sentenced to undergo RI for a … dated 04.02.2009, whereby the appellant has been held guilty and convicted for the offences punishable under Section 376 Indian Penal Code, 1860. Also challenged the order on sentence dated 09.02.2009 whereby, appellant was sentenced to undergo RI … appellant has been held guilty and convicted for the offences punishable under Section 376 Indian Penal Code, 1860. Also challenged the order on sentence dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1999

Bank of Rajasthan Limited Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-26-1999

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10E and 113; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), and for the purpose of Section 196 of that Code.' 8. From a perusal … shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), and for the purpose of Section 196 of that Code.' 8. From

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2022

Ravi Varma Thampan and Others vs D.F.O. Nenmara and Another

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-29-2022

registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 447, 465, 467, 468, 471, 420, 423, 167 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.3. The crime was registered pursuant to a complaint filed bythe Divisional Forest Officer, Nenmara. The FIR alleged … registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 447, 465, 467, 468, 471, 420, 423, 167 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.3. The crime was registered pursuant to a complaint filed bythe Divisional Forest Officer, Nenmara. The … MAGISTRATE COURT, CHITTUR PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 1 TO 5 :1 RAVI VARMA THAMPAN, 4B, SIGLEADALE POINT, SIVAPURI, BANK ROAD, CALICUT - 673 001. 2 SARADA THAMPATTY

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2022

S. Muhammed Ismail vs Divisional Forest Officer and Another

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-29-2022

registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 447, 465, 467, 468, 471, 420, 423, 167 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.3. The crime was registered pursuant to a complaint filed bythe Divisional Forest Officer, Nenmara. The FIR alleged … registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 447, 465, 467, 468, 471, 420, 423, 167 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.3. The crime was registered pursuant to a complaint filed bythe Divisional Forest Officer, Nenmara. The … MAGISTRATE COURT, CHITTUR PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 1 TO 5 :1 RAVI VARMA THAMPAN, 4B, SIGLEADALE POINT, SIVAPURI, BANK ROAD, CALICUT - 673 001. 2 SARADA THAMPATTY

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2024

Smt Roopa a T vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-23-2024

offences punishable under Sections 201, 409, 465, 468, 471, 420 and 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( for short, 'IPC') as against her/them.3. In Crl.P. No.831/2019, petitioners havealso sought to quash the order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2020

Poulose vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-10-2020

to quash Annexure-A1 final report in Crime No.845/2004registered for offences punishable under Sections 414 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC').2. Petitioner is an owner of a jewellery called “Maliyakal Poulose Jewellery” situatedwithin the limits

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2024

I Can Nano Green Products India Pvt.Ltd vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-24-2024

Ernakulam South Police Station, registered for the offences under Section 406 and 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Third respondent is the defacto complainant.3. According to the prosecution, the accused had cheatedthe defacto complainant by … Ernakulam South Police Station, registered for the offences under Section 406 and 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Third respondent is the defacto complainant.3. According to the prosecution, the accused had cheatedthe defacto … this the 24th day of July, 2024ORDERPetitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash all proceedings against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial